as salam alaykum.
I came across with site Mahajjah. They have some superb books, I am uploading them here. Spread the word!
- Muhammad Malullah. Shia wal Quran.
- Answering allegations against Abu Hurayrah. Abd Allāh ibn ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz ibn ʿAlī al-Nāṣir
- Mutah by Mawlana Hafidh IqbalThe author has emphatically proven that the Mut`ah of the Shi`ah was never permitted in the history of Islam nor is there any room for its permissibility under the lofty standard of social values which Islam promotes. Neither did Rasulullah salla Llahu `alayhi wa sallam, any of the Sahabah or Ahl al-Bayt of Rasulullah salla Llahu `alayhi wa sallam ever indulge in this shameless act nor did they encourage it. The Muslim ummah should not be misled by the fabrications of the Shi`ah with regards to Mut`ah. This book will aid in understanding the reality of Mut`ah as well as its clear and unambiguous prohibition.
- Usul Madhab ash-Shia. Shaykh Nasir al-Qiffari
- Ayatul Bayinat by former shia Nawab Muhsin al-Mulk.
- Defense of sayidina Muawiyah from Hasan Farhan, by shaykh Sad al-Subay.
- Defense of Uthman ibn Affan.
- Hz Ali among companions by Muhammad al-Aydarus.
- Hadith saqalayn explained by Mawlana Muhammad Nafi.
- Virtues of sayidina Umar.
- Virtues of sayidina Abu Bakr from Suyuti.
- He had 4 daughters, refuting shia lunatics.
- Ibn Sabah fact not fiction.
- Triumph of the Truth. Sunni Shia real debate.
- Murder of hz Ammar and role of shias.
- Prohibition of cursing the companions by Diyah al-Makdisi.
- History of shiaizm by Abdal shakur Lucknowi.
- Hadiyyat al-Shia Molana Muhammad Qasim Nanotwi
- Muawiyah by Zafar Iqbal.
For those who want to print them: http://freemypdf.com/
بسم الله و الحمد لله الذي رفع راية التوحيد إلى يوم الدين, و الصلاة و السلام على إمام الموحدين و قائد المتوكلين, نبينا و سيدنا محمد و على آله الطيبين و صحبه الغر الميامين, و بعد:
Here’s a compilation (of Shia and Sunni) SAHIH (authentic) narrations about the prohibition of erecting structures over graves, venerating graves, kissing them etc. Many Shias are not even aware that these reports exists in their books, this might be due to the allergy their scholars have when it comes to Tawhid. Shia scholars usually do not mention the narrations we are going to present you, and if they do (only due to pressure of the Internet that has exposed their religion), they (as usual) come up with abstract and far-fetched interpretations to explain the monothestic narrations that are deeply buried somewhere in their Madhhab (yes, even in their Madhhab, despite all the lies they have attributed to the Ahl al-Bayt) away in order to secure their money-machines, which you will soon find out are the exravagant palace+5* looking tombs, shrines and mausoleums.
Have you every heard Shia scholars warning agains the dangers of superstitions, exeggeration with Awliyah (i.e. saints, Imams) or Shirk? We not saying that you might find some lectures by more rational Shi’ites (who are closer to Sunnis) about these topics, however, the mainstream of the Imamites, their top Ayatullahs and preachers in the west constantly talk about everything in regards to the Ahl al-Bayt but the dangers of Shirk? The sheer thought of seeing the banner, video titled etc. by Shi’ites, warning against Shirk seems to abstract, in fact an oxymoron.
Iraqi Twelver Shia soldier thanking his Persian looking deity (they are fooled to believe that is ‘Ali or Hussein or Abul-Fadhl etc.) by postrating to his image. Have you ever seen such forms of extremism in Sunnis, even in it’s most esoterical form i.e. Sufism? Images of ‘Omar, people prostating to him? Of course not, it’s not the nature of Sunnism, it’s the nature of Twelver Imamism (Shi’ism) where such practices naturally envolve due to the Ghuluww with the Ahl al-Bayt.
Now what does constitute Shirk to them? This important topic must be somewhere covered by them. Is it the over-exaggeration with the Ahl al-Bayt? Dangers of grave/shrine veneration? Lets see:
Yes, the title is kind of provoking (but nothing compared to what you are going to read from Shia books!) and many of you (Sunnah or Shia) – especially the common folks among the Shias – might have never heard about a single of the following narrations (that have all been classified as reliable narrations in regards to the Shia Mahdi by major classical Shia scholars whose views have more weight than any Marja’) that we have collected in this unique article. We’ve gathered the best of the best we could find on numerous Arabic websites that have (aready) finished off Shiism – especially regarding our very topic – ages ago. Even the Arab speaking Shias on various forums couldn’t come up with any good explanation except (as it is always the case) with very lame excuses and strange and far–fetched explanation for the sadistic, Zoroastrian, Jewish and mass-murdering attributes of their hidden 12th saviour.
We are talking about a thorough exposure where not a single doubt will be left that the 12th Imam of the Rafidha could be ANYONE but the real Muslim Mahdi.
العديد من المؤمنين يتساءلون عن الطريقة التي سيموت بها الإمام المهدي ، وإذا كان (عليه السلام) سيستشهد فهذا يعني أنّ الغاية من كلّ مسيرة الأئمّة (عليهم السلام)ومن غَيبة الإمام الطويلة ـ وهي تحقيق الكمال للبشريّة وتوجّههم للدين ـ لن تتحقّق ، فما هو قولكم في ذلك؟
الجواب :باسمه جلت اسمائهنقلَ صاحب كتاب إلزام الناصب: أنّه إذا تمّت السبعون سنة، أتى الحجّةَ الموت، فتقتله امرأة من بني تميم اسمها سعيدة، ولها لحية كلحية الرجال، بجاون صخر من فوق سطح، وهو متجاوز في الطريق. وفوزه بالشهادة لا يتنافى مع بلوغ البشريّة قمّة الكمال، فإنّ الكمال للمجموع، وليس لكلِّ فرد فرد.
Compilied and translated by brother TripolySunni, prepared by Faylaq Omar.
READ AND LOAD IT HERE.
People who spend some of their time in browsing our blog, already seen how many shia scholars did believe in tahrif of Quran. I decided to make a fihrist of their names.
Shaykh Saduq in his “Tawheed” p 163, narrated following hadith:
2 – حدثنا محمد بن الحسن بن أحمد بن الوليد رحمه الله، قال: حدثنا محمد ابن الحسن الصفار، عن محمد بن عيسى، عن المشرقي، عن عبدالله بن قيس(2) عن أبي الحسن الرضا عليه السلام قال: سمعته يقول: (بل يداه مبسوطتان) فقلت: له يدان هكذا، وأشرت بيدي إلى يده، فقال: لا، لو كان هكذا لكان مخلوقا.
From Abdullah ibn Qays, I heard Abul Hasan ar-Ridha reciting (the verse) “Nay, both His hands are spread out” (al-Maida 64). I said to him: “He had hands line these?” and pointed by my hands to his. He said: “No, if they would be like these (hands), He would be (considered) creation”.
What is important here?
Imam didn’t say, He has no hands, that is power, energy and etc. He said if Allah would have hands like ours, He would be considered creation.
Ayatollah Shubbar in his book “Masabih al anwar”2/295 said:
(القرآن الذي أُنزل على النبي (ص) أكثر مما في أيدينا اليوم ، وقد أُسقط منه شيء كثير ، كما دلت الأخبار المتظافرة التي كادت أن تكون متواترة ، وقد أوضحنا ذلك في كتابنا : منية المحصلين في حقيقة طريقة المجتهدين)
“Quran which is was revealed on messenger (sallalahu alayhi wa sallam) was bigger than the one which is on our hands today. Lots of things been dropped from it, like it was proved by concerted reports that almost reaches level of mutawatir. We made this clear in our book “Munyatul Muhsilin fi Haqiqat Tariqat al-Mujtahidin”.
First of all, what is khums in Islam? And what is khums in shia understanding? In accordance to Islamic texts, khums it is 1/5 of war booty that Muslims are getting after the battles. It should be payed to group of people, as it would be show later from the verse of Quran. Continue reading
Famous and known shia scholar Hoor al-Amili in “Fawaid Toosiyah” (p 483, scan page) said:
وقد تواترت الروايات بأنه لم يجمع القرآن كله الا الأئمة عليهم السلام وان من أدعى انه جمعه كله فهو كاذب.
وورد النص الصحيح بأن القرآن الذي نزل على محمد صلى الله عليه واله كان سبعة عشر ألف آية. والموجود الان نحو الثلث باعتبار
And there are mutawater reports that no one gathered Quran apart from imams (as), and whoever will claim that he did it, he is liar. And there is sound text that Quran that has been revealed upon Muhammad (sallalahu alaihi wa sallam) contained 17000 verses. And the one which is present is only 1/3 of these numbers.
Shia preacher shaykh Abdulhalim al-Ghazzi said (starts from 00:33):
“Do you know, that al-Wahabiya posses knowledge of our ahadeth, I swear by Allah, I swear by Allah – I say that. More than our scholars…. Go to wahabi sites, and you will find in their sites, for example I ask you to check site of Faysal Noor (fnoor.com). Enter that site, you will find reports extracted from our books. By Allah if you will take them to the scholars of shia, they will say: We don’t have such (reports in our books). But they (indeed) present in our books. (They say such reports doesn’t exist) because there is no knowledge of ahadeth with them”.
In the statement (في ماورد) (it says) that body of this abuse and curse will be from the best of types of worship in the view of Allah. Will be (like saying) La Ilaha ila Llah. Will be (like saying) SubhanAllah. And if it is said: Curse of Allah upon oppressor of such and such, it is like you said: La ilaha Ila LLah. Or like you said: SubhanAllah.