What is more important: Quran or aimma?


Prepared by brother TripolySunni:

Grand Aytaollat Ruhane, and his view on Quran:

السؤال: هل يوجد علماء من الطرفين السنة والشيعة من يقول بالتحريف بمعنى الزيادة و النقصان في القرآن الكريم و هل يستدعي تكفير من يقول ذلك؟
الجواب: باسمه جلت أسمائه
یوجد علماء قائلون بالتحریف و لکن لا یستدعی تکفیرهم

Translation:

Question: Are there Scholars from both sides The Sunnah and the Shia who claim that the Quran is Corrupt(Mouharraf) in terms of Addition and Deletion? and should we Make Takfeer on them?
Answer: Bismillah,
There Are Scholars who Claim this But We don’t Need to Make Takfeer On them.
– end –

In accordance to our school, each and everyone who would say that Quran which is on our hand was corrupted is kaafir.  We are challenging Ruhane and all his followers, to give us single known name of sunni scholar, with direct reference to his book (scan or link, because rafida couldn’t be trusted), which would say that Quran was tampered.

Now let us see view of Ruhane on place of aimma.

السؤال: هل صحيح أن الأئمة عليهم السلام أفضل من كل الأنبياء عدا رسول الله صلى الله عليه و آله؟ وإذا كن ذلك ثابت فما حكم من أنكره؟
الجواب: باسمه جلت أسمائه
الروايات الكثيرة الصحيحة تدل علي أفضلية الأئمة ع عن جميع الأنبياء عليهم السلام غير رسول صلي الله عليه و اله؛ و من راجع الكتب لا يبقي له شك في ذلك و أما من أنكره إذا كان فاضلا و راجع الكتب فهو معاند و كافر؛ و أما من لم يكن راجعا إلي تلکم الروايات فلا يكون كافرا، و بالجملة إنكار ذلك إنكار للضروري

Translation:

Question: Is it true that the imams peace be upon them are better than all prophets except for the prophet Muhammad peace be upon him and his family? And if that were true then what is the ruling of the one who rejects it?
Answer: Bismillah,
There are plenty of sahih narrations showing that the imams are better than all prophets except for our prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ali); And he who revises the books will have no doubts in this matter unless he rejects it out of stubbornness then he’s a KAFFIR, whereas he who does not know about those narrations he isn’t a kaffir, for rejecting it is rejecting what is necessary.
– end –

So belief in the corruption of Quran, belief of their greatest scholars like Kulayni and Jaza`eri, Bahrani and many others….isn’t so important to make takfeer upon them. May be because Quran isn’t a big deal for shias? But if someone would reject idiocy that imams are better than prophets, he’s kaafir in accordance to this zindiq Ruhane!

Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi rajion!