Known dajal and cursed creation, which openly accused mother of believers in adultery, was asked question at his official board.
I would like to ask you to list down the references from Sunni books regarding the planned of Abu Bakr and Umar who intend to assasinate our Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him and pure progeny)on his way of Tabuk.
Maloon Yasir al-Habith answered:
There are several narrations some of which were narrated by Walid ibn Jami’ [a highly recognised Bakri Hadith narrator].
Needless to say, Bakris have hidden these traditions so that their so-called companions could remain unexposed.
By Grace of Allah we deal with accusation regarding so called hadith from book of ibn Hazm HERE.
But here in the answer of shameless liar al-Habith, another example of blatant lie.
He said: There are several narrations some of which were narrated by Walid ibn Jami’ [a highly recognised Bakri Hadith narrator].
Lie #1. Hadith mean text plus chain. This is requirement in Islam. There is only one story without a chain, from the way of Walid ibn Jami. So words that some narrations were narrated by Walid, are nothing but blatant lie. Because there is no hadith at all, let alone some of them.
Lie #2. He said there are several narrations. So obviously he claimed that in our sources (because he was asked for our sources) there are other narrations, from other ways than so called report of Walid. And that’s another blatant lie. Because in our sources there is nothing regarding that except of this chainless story from Walid which is in “Muhalla”.
He said: Despite the fact that Ibn Hazm was fully aware of these traditions, he chose not to report them.
Obviously this shia dajal claims that he knows unseen. Because only person who knows unseen could claim that he knew what other person, which lived a hundreds years ago, was aware of.