Shias attacks al-‘Abbas and ‘Aqeel

al-Salamu ‘Aleykum,

In al-Kafi volume 8 page 189 we read:

مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى عَنْ أَحْمَدَ بْنِ مُحَمَّدٍ عَنِ الْحُسَيْنِ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ النُّعْمَانِ عَنْ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ مُسْكَانَ عَنْ سَدِيرٍ قَالَ كُنَّا عِنْدَ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ ( عليه السلام ) فَذَكَرْنَا مَا أَحْدَثَ النَّاسُ بَعْدَ نَبِيِّهِمْ ( صلى الله عليه وآله ) وَ اسْتِذْلَالَهُمْ أَمِيرَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ ( عليه السلام ) فَقَالَ رَجُلٌ مِنَ الْقَوْمِ أَصْلَحَكَ اللَّهُ فَأَيْنَ كَانَ عِزُّ بَنِي هَاشِمٍ وَ مَا كَانُوا فِيهِ مِنَ الْعَدَدِ فَقَالَ أَبُو جَعْفَرٍ ( عليه السلام ) وَ مَنْ كَانَ بَقِيَ مِنْ بَنِي هَاشِمٍ إِنَّمَا كَانَ جَعْفَرٌ وَ حَمْزَةُ فَمَضَيَا وَ بَقِيَ مَعَهُ رَجُلَانِ ضَعِيفَانِ ذَلِيلَانِ حَدِيثَا عَهْدٍ بِالْإِسْلَامِ عَبَّاسٌ وَ عَقِيلٌ وَ كَانَا مِنَ الطُّلَقَاءِ أَمَا وَ اللَّهِ لَوْ أَنَّ حَمْزَةَ وَ جَعْفَراً كَانَا بِحَضْرَتِهِمَا مَا وَصَلَا إِلَى مَا وَصَلَا إِلَيْهِ وَ لَوْ كَانَا شَاهِدَيْهِمَا لَأَتْلَفَا نَفْسَيْهِمَا


Sadir said: We were with abu Ja’afar (as) and he mentioned what the people did after the Prophet SAWS and how they humiliated Ameer al-Mumineen (as) so a man said to him: May Allah forgive you, where was the pride of bani Hashim and their big numbers? he (as) replied: Ja’afar and Hamza had passed away and only two weak servile(1) men who are new to Islam remained and they were ‘Abbas and ‘Aqeel, they are freed prisoners…”

(1) Servile: easily yielding and submissive.


al-Majlisi said: Hasan 26/83.
al-Behbudi said: Sahih 3/393.

And for those who do not completely understand the language, basically al-Baqir (rah) just harshly insulted ‘Aqeel (ra) and al-‘Abbas (ra) according to this Shia Hadith.

And from al-Anwar al-Nu’umaniyah of Ni’imatullah al-Jazaeri, in “Majalis al-Mumineen” page 78 we read:

عن علي بن أبي طالب أنه قال – وهو يذكر قلة أعوانه وأنصاره -: ولم يبق معي من أهل بيتي أحد أطول به وأقوى، أما حمزة فقتل يوم أحد، وجعفر قتل يوم مؤتة، وبقيت بين خلفين خائفين ذليلين حقيرين، العباس وعقيل” الأنوار النعمانية”


Narrated from ‘Ali bin abi Talib: “None of my Ahlul-Bayt remained with me so that I can use their support to strengthen myself, Hamza died in Uhud, Ja’afar died on the day of Muutah, And I remained with what was left, two scared, servile, worthless men, al-‘Abbas and ‘Aqeel.”

Now check out this lovely book called “Mathalib al-‘Arab” by the Shia scholar Dr. Hisham al-Kalbi, this book in which he attacks the Arab race because he’s a god forsaken racist, read what he says under the chapter “The Sodomites” (meaning gays):


“And Hisham bin ‘Abdullah bin abi Qays from Bani ‘Amir bin Luay, and he is abu Wahib the grandfather of the narrator ibn abu Thuayb who died in Islam, and they say: al-‘Abbas bin ‘Abdul-Muttalib was one of the Sodomites (gays) and Allah knows best.”

Instead of defending the uncle of the Prophet SAWS al-‘Abbas (ra), the filthy Shia scholar says “And Allah knows best”!!!? As if to say “Yeah why not, he could be gay”!!! May Allah destroy this Racist Shia filth.

And this book was researched by another Shia piece of Trash scholar called Neccah at-Tai  (see him previously at our blog).

What did the Shia researcher say in the footnotes of al-Mathalib? He said:

And I suspect the Umayyads are behind this rumour [The researcher].

SubhanAllah! are the Umayyads also behind the insults in al-Kafi and al-Anwar above? are they also after the insults to al-‘Abbas and his children in Rijal al-Kashshi?

PS. Posted by brother Hani – Tripoly sunni

2 thoughts on “Shias attacks al-‘Abbas and ‘Aqeel

  1. Assalaamu ‘Alaykum,

    Sadeer has big time ikhtilaaf on his narrations. And If you read his narrations you can see that he is weak and he quotes narrations that no one quotes. This is why you see al-Hilli quote al-‘aqiqi showing that he is weak

  2. can the quote from al kafi be more specific, such as from which kitab and which bab instead of vol & page no. Pages may be different between 1 edition to another. thanks

Comments are closed.