I’d like to share with small observation from the book of one of the top shia shaykhs known as Mufid. In his book “Risala hawla hadith Nahnu Muasharul Anbiya la Nuwarith” (page 4), thk: Malik al-Mahmudi, al-Mufid said:
and Abu Bakr also rejected this inquiry from her by hadith which he narrated alone, that messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) said: We group of messengers are not to be inherited from and all that we leave should be spend for charity.
and along with all, THIS REPORT IS WAHID, IT WAS NOT KNOWN, HEARD, AND REPORTED AT THAT DAY BY ANYONE EXCEPT ABU BAKR.
In the footnote you can see muhaqiq says:
and even if chains of this report are many after that, and they increased to level of mutawatir in the days of Muawiya.
1) We can see here baseless claim from author and muhaqiq. They claim that no one didn’t report this hadith in that time except Abu Bakr.
Kattani in “Nazmul mutanaseera min al hadeethal mutawateera” (272) wrote:
“Narration that no one inherits from prophets, everything that they leave behind is for charity
Suyooti in “Azhar” reported it via:
4) Sad ibn Abi Vaqas
6) Abu Bakr.
7) Abdurrahman ibn Auf.
8. Zubayr ibn Awam.
9) Abu Hurayra.
13) ibn Abbas.
13 sahaba in total
8 from “Ashara mubashara” reported this narration. So this hadeeth is close to “Who will lie upon me
Ibn Hajar in “Amaliya Muhraja ala muhtasaru ibnul Hajeeb al Asli” said: “This narration, is authetic and mutawateer”.”..
So on what base these filthy shia liars claim that no one didn’t report this hadith in that time? Nothing but stupid ignorance and their imagination force them to get this conclusion.
2) There are sound shia reports with exactly same meaning. See our discussion of Fadak.
Why Mufid and almost each other shia scholar turn to be deaf and blind when they face with such ahadeth in their books?
How is it possible to make a hint that Abu Bakr fabricated this report, if your OWN MASOOM IMAM NARRATED THE VERY SAME REPORT IN YOUR SOUND BOOKS IN SOUND FORM?
How is it possible to be such two faced?