Just example of so called shia 12-ers unity.
However, the fact that Bahjat’s righteousness was under question and some Jurists adjudge Bahjat according to available evidence against his uprightness, that could not mean that the Sheikh would simply sign up or disagree depending on heresy. He decided on Bahjat’s deviation after thorough evaluation and research.
And al-Khabith made takfir upon Nasrullat:
The opinion of Sheikh Yasser al-Habib on the leader who defeated the Israeli aggression is the same opinion you have on Mohammed Al Fatih, an Ottoman Sultan who defeated the Romans. It is the same opinion you have on Omar who defeated the Zoroastrian Persians!
The Sheikh views Hassan Nasrallah as the “Salahdin of our Time”! Just as we reject the olden Salahdin who defeated the Crusades due to his oppression and deviations. Similarly, Hassan Nasrallah defeated the Zionist Army, but we reject him due to his oppression and deviations. There is no difference between the two except the second is wearing a black turban.
Hassan Nasrallah recorded before Allah Al Mighty, before people at large and for History that he has a firm position in defence of his lady and beloved mistress Aisha. He openly attacked Sheikh al-Habib during a public sermon. So why can you accept that Hassan Nasrallah do what he did in the open? Whereas, you cannot tolerate what Sheikh al-Habib did. He also said what he said about the enemy of Allah in the open.