Yes, the title is kind of provoking (but nothing compared to what you are going to read from Shia books!) and many of you (Sunnah or Shia) – especially the common folks among the Shias – might have never heard about a single of the following narrations (that have all been classified as reliable narrations in regards to the Shia Mahdi by major classical Shia scholars whose views have more weight than any Marja’) that we have collected in this unique article. We’ve gathered the best of the best we could find on numerous Arabic websites that have (aready) finished off Shiism – especially regarding our very topic – ages ago. Even the Arab speaking Shias on various forums couldn’t come up with any good explanation except (as it is always the case) with very lame excuses and strange and far–fetched explanation for the sadistic, Zoroastrian, Jewish and mass-murdering attributes of their hidden 12th saviour.
We are talking about a thorough exposure where not a single doubt will be left that the 12th Imam of the Rafidha could be ANYONE but the real Muslim Mahdi.
The most he resembles is the Dajjaal (the Messiah of the Zionist) and we have a number of articles on this blog (in the Rafidhi Mahdi section) proving that, yet, what is unkown to many – as stated before – is that this mass-murdering Zionist king/Messiah actually also resembles the King/Messiah of ANOTHER defeated group in the time of the Sahabah, namely the Sassanian Majoos (Persian Empire, who were the MOST hostile towards the Prophet and the Sahaba). Again, even if you feel provoked, once you understood the seriousness of the matter and how far away the romanticised and peace bringing image of the 12th Shia Imam (who has NOTHING to do with the Muslim Mahdi) is from the truth, maybe then – despite being shocked or/and aroused – you will leave all the false pride and bias beside and actually start realising that Shiism, particularly its masonic Mahdawism cult is nothing but a heresy in the name of Islam.
Many Shias (and even ignorant Sunnis) have been tricked with the romanticised image of the so called 12th Imam by the Shia propagandists around the world, especially the Iranian Shia regime. The sadistic and mass-murdering reality of the so called 12th Mahdi is unknown to even many Shias, let alone Shias, and in this, the Shia clergy resemble the Christian Chruch, especially the Evangelical preachers who (in order to lure people into their pagan trinitarian cult) speak day and night about peace, harmony and how God/Jesus loves us ALL. They play with the emotions of the people and barely mention the DARK side of their game, namely that according to ANCIENT Christian creed, Jesus (peace be upon him), once he returned to earth before the Day of Judgement, will be SLAUGHTERING everyone who decides not to accept him as his Lord! How similar it is to the deceptions of the ‘Ayatullahs’ who have fooled (some of) the Ummah with their romanticised story of their 12th Imam, their hidden Messiah, without (or barely) mentioning a word about the up-comming massacre (in the most perverted and sadistic way) he will bring.
As an introdution and to get warmed up, let us start off with a very crucial and important Shia narrations, all proving the REAL origin of the Rafidhi Mahdi (the Dajjaal) who in reality could be anyone EXCEPT the son of Fatimah (عليها السلام و الرضوان). You will literally sense the grudge and hatred the Rafidha ancestors must have had when creating this pagan Frankenstein, this mass-murdering, Jewish-Sassanian (Majoos), Arab-hating monster with the help of heretics among the Ummah who ascribed themselves to Islam (under the banner of Shiism) and ascibed these narration to the great Imams of the Ahl Al-Bayt (such as Imam Al-Sadiq, Imam Al-Baqir etc).
مهدي الرافضة من سلالة كسرى فارس يزدجرد بن شهريار
روى ابن عياش في المقتضب، عن الحسين بن علي بن سفيان البزوفري ، عن محمد بن علي بن الحسن البوشنجاني، عن أبيه، عن محمد بن سليمان، عن أبيه، عن النوشجان بن البودمردان، قال: لما جلى الفرس عن القادسية وبلغ يزدجرد بن شهريار ما كان من رستم وإدالة العرب عليه وظن أن رستم قد هلك والفرس جميعا وجاء مبادر وأخبره بيوم القادسية وانجلائها عن خمسين ألف قتيل، خرج يزدجرد هاربا في أهل بيته ووقف بباب الايوان، وقال: السلام عليك أيها الايوان ! ها أنا ذا منصرف عنك وراجع إليك، أنا أو رجل من ولدي لم يدن زمانه ولا آن أوانه.قال سليمان الديلمي: فدخلت على أبي عبد الله عليه السلام فسألته عن ذلك وقلت له: ما قوله: ” أو رجل من ولدي “فقال: “ذلك صاحبكم القائم بأمر الله عز وجل السادس من ولدي قد ولده يزدجرد فهو ولده”
. انتهىكتاب بحار الأنوار للمجلسي – الجزء 51 – الصفحة 164 – طبعة مؤسسة الوفاء – بيروت لبنان- الطبعة الثانية 1403هـ – 1983م
When the Persians were defeated at Al-Qadisiyyah (Iraq) and Yazdgerd Ibn Shahryar (the Kisra i.e. king of the Sassanian Majoosi/Zoroastrian evil and oppressive empire) was informed about that and that Rustum (his general) was captured, he thought that Rustum and the Persians are all perished until someone informed him about (the battle) of Al-Qadisiyyah and about the loss of 50.000 (Majoosi soldiers, against a handful Sahaba!!!). Upon that, Yazgerd fled to his household and stood infront of the gates of Al-Iwan (his palace) and said:
“Peace be upon you, o Iwan! This is where I am going to leave you and where I will met you again, me or a man of my progeny […]. Sulayman Al-Dulaimi entered upon Abi Abdillah (Imam Al-Sadiq) and asked him about that. I asked him: ‘What does he (Yazdgerd III) mean with “a man of my progeny”? He (Imam Al-Sadiq) said: ‘It is none other but one who is the arising (Shia Mahdi) by the will of Allah, the sixth (from the progeny) of my father, Yazgerd has given him birth, he is his father’. (Bihar Al-Anwar, vol. 51, p. 164)
Yes, this is their true belief in regards to their Mahdi. They can claim day and night that their Mahdi is going to be from the progeny of Fatimah (عليها السلام), no sane Muslim will ever believe them, especially once we have analysed his Jewish-Masonic-Magi (Majoosi) and mass-murdering nature. Keep in mind that their narrations (always ascribing heresies and innovations and praise of pre-Persian customs to the Ahl Al-Bayt!), like the one above or not simply stating that their 12th Imam will have Persian blood (which is not the problem, even if it was Yazgerd’s), the shocking thing is that they fabricated narrations, ascribed it to the Ahl Al-Bayt, how the DEFEATED Sassanians, in the narration embodied by the Kisra of that time (King of that time, Yazgerd the third) swears to take REVENGE against the Arabs (i.e. the Sahaba) who conquered Persia (by the way, the aggressor was Persia, since before the Muslims attacked Persia, the Sassanian Empire occupied many Arab lands, including the mother of all Arab lands i.e. Yemen! Sassanian Persia tried even to assassinate the Prophet as been stated in authentic narrations) and put an end to the oppressive Sassanian thugs and their caste system (the Zorostrian clerical caste which is similar to the Shia one).
Also note that although some historical accounts mention that Omar Ibn Al-Khattab (who ALWAYS preferred the Ahl Al-Bayt over himself and even his own children) gave the daughter of the defeated tyrant and king Yazdgerd III to Al-Hussein Ibn Ali Ibn Abi Talib (and thus the lineage of the fourth Imam Zayn Al-Abidin i.e. the son of Al-Hussein carries royal Persian blood) yet how on earth could the Rafidha have the audacity to fabricate narrations where Al-Sadiq refers to the lineage of the Mahdi from his alleged Sassanian (Yazdgerd III) mother side?! Worse than that, the narration clearly states that Yazdgerd III (who was defeated by the Sahabah and was eventually killed by a Persian i.e. his own people while he tried to save his miserable life!) swore that someone from HIS lineage will take revenge from the Muslim! This someone is no one but the Shia Mahdi, the Kisra (King) of the Sassanian Majoos that is why it is actually not quite shocking that the Rafidha have went so far to attribute Zoroastrian titles to the Mahdi!
‘Al-Najmu Al-Thāqib‘ by the Hussein Noori Al-Tabrissi. Apart from the (never in the Qur’an, Sunnah or ANYWHERE authentically proven) 182 (!) names and titles that the Rafidhi Mahdi has (among them Abu Bakr and ‘Friday’, ‘The Clock’, ‘The Owner Of The White Ball’ etc!), there are a number of ancient Persian-Zoroastrian titles such as:
#4: Izad Shenās (‘The one who has knowledge about Izad). Izad is the new Persian form of Yazata. Yazata is originially an Avestan (Majoosi) language adjective derived from the verbal root yaz- “to worship, to honor, to venerate”. From the same root comes Avestan yasna “worship, sacrifice, oblation, prayer”. A yazata is accordingly “a being worthy of worship” or “a holy being”.)
#5: Izad Neshān (‘The one who illustrates God’. The Shiite author mentions that the 4th and 5th nickname are special titles of the Majoos/Zoroastrians! He says that according to the Shia scholar Shaykh Al-Baha’i they – the Majoos -will call him by these names!)
#6: Istāde (‘The Risen One’. Another title that was given to him by the Majoos, according to the Shiite author!)
#23: Bahrām (the Zoroastrian divinity that is the hypostasis of victory. So Rafidha can not only call upon their 12th Imam by yelling “Ya Mahdi adriknaa, Ya Sahib Al-Zaman” etc. now they can add “Ya Bahram adriknaa”!)
#24: Bandeh Yazdān (‘the slave of Yazdan’. Yazdan is the plural of the word ‘Yazd’ which is related to the Avestan word Izad meaning divine)
#25: Parviz (a Persian male given name, meaning ‘fortunate’)
#26: Khajasteh (another Persian name , meaning benedict/happy)
#27: Khosro (Majoos) (Persian form of the Arabised word ‘Kisra’ i.e. King of the Zoroastrians!)
#28: Khodā Shenās (a Persian title, meaning the one who has knowledge about God)
Mind-boggling isn’t it? The Shiism has ascribed pre-Islamic Zoroastrian (Majoosi) titles to their Mahdi. The same Mahdi who according to them is the descendant of of Yazdgerd III the last defeated (by Omar Ibn Al-Khattab) Sassanian Majoosi Kisra (King of Persia). In fact they even ascribed the title of Kisra (title of the Kings of Persia) to their Mahdi! Some of the Arab Shia forums try to desperately explain these ZOROASTRIAN titles by suggesting that since the Mahdi will be sent for manking, then it is normal for him having titles in different languages. The response to this lame excuse is the following:
1. Why doesn’t he have Turkish, Latin or any other title? Why has he got NINE (!) not just Persian but even religious Zoroastrian titles?!
2. The Prophet (peace be upon him) was also sent to mankind, yet where in the authentic Sunnah has he ever been called by Zoroastrian titles?!
3. Where in the authentic Sunnah has anyone of the Ahl Al-Bayt told their followers that the Mahdi will carry such titles? It’s not only that these titles are in a forgeign language, the scary part is that most of these titles are purely Zoroastrian (Majoosi)!
It should be clear by now that the Rafidhi Mahdi is nothing but the spawn of the defeated Sassanian empire who infiltrated Islam, slowly but steadily, of course not just under the banner of Islam, but under the banner of the so called ‘school of Ahl Al-Bayt’, under the banner of ‘following and loving the Ahl Al-Bayt’. They knew that with this sweet from the outside but toxic from within slogan they can win the hearts of many ignorant and gullible individuals (even among the Arabs) and often just hateful and filled with grudge individuals among all those who lost not just power in Arabia (the Jews) but the Sassanian Empire itself (i.e. a minority of Persian heretics who to this day use the Tashayyu’/Shiism as a tool to destroy Islam from within with all sorts of heresies. Note, a minority of Persians, since Persias history is mostly Sunni and Persia produced many great Sunni scholars right up to the 16th AD when the Safavids took over Persia and infested it with the cancer of Rafidhi Shiism). The Rafidhi Shia Mahdi is hence the Frankenstein, the revenger and the manifestation of all Sassanian (and of course Jewish) grudge that you can imagine. The evidence will prove that without a shred of doubt, In sha Allah.
This article is neither in support of the Arab race nor in support of Persian bashing. A Muslim should always seek the truth even if he finds out that (a small number) of his own people have fooled the massess in the name of ‘Ahl Al-Bayt’ while in reality they are nothing but pagan Majoos who aim to destroy Islam from within. As for our beloved Muslim Persians (including Shias who are sick of the heresies of Shiism), then there is no doubt that the majority of Persians (especially before the Safavids) were sincere and wonderful Muslims, after all Iran was 900 years majority Sunni (and only 500 years Shiite!) and produced a HUGE number of major Islamic personalities (including many of the Salaf themselves!).
The majority of the Persian people were never forced to Islam (It took Persia over three hundred years after the Islamic conquest to become a majority Muslims SUNNI nation) and were sincere Sunni Muslims for most of Iran’s Islamic history in fact they made one of the greatest contributions to Islam, so the issue here is not an “Arabs VS Persian” issue, rather it is a truth VS falsehood issue.
Nevertheless there is no doubt that the supporters of Yazdgerd III and the former ruling class did not just vanish, they were furious and wanted to harm Islam as much as they could, just as the defeated Jews (Ibn Saba’) and Romans (Christians) wanted to weaken the new faith, and is there any better way to weaken a faith but from within, through distortion? Certainly the Jews (Ibn Saba) did their part by turning Tashayyu’ (Shiism) from a political party into a sect with alien beliefs such as Imamah/’Isma/Takfeer of Sahaba etc., the Majoos, the deafeted Sassanids on the other hand (with the emerge of the Safavid era) turned the already innovated religion of Tashayyu’ into the dream of Yazdgerd III i.e. a Persian cult with a Khosro Majoos 12th saviour. It is hence not suprising that according to Shiism their Mahdi will appear on the Zoroastrian holiday of Nowrooz (a sanctified holiday by Shia scholars!)
‘Al-Mu’alla narrates from Imam Al-Sadiq : “Nowrooz is no other day but the one we [the Ahl Al-Bayt] are awaiting the reappearance [of Al-Mahdi], for it is one of our days that was protected by the Persians and carelessly lost by you.” (‘Al-Du’a’ li Al-Imam Al-Zaman’, p. 94)
As you can see above, they THEMSELVES use these narrations to explain THEIR belief in the Mahdi! Their Mahdi will emerge on the Majoosi holiday of Nowrooz!!! Look how they have portrayed Imam Al-Sadiq! He literally blames the Arabs for having forgotten the Majoosi holiday of Nowrooz! A holiday that was never sanctified in Islam! Look how much Sassanian-Pre-Islamic-Persian customs have infiltrated Shiism, then they wonder why they are being called Majoos!
[Narration attributed to Imam Al-Sadiq who is free of Majoosite Rafidhism]: ‘The day of Nowrooz is the day when our Qa’im of Ahl Al-Bayt (Mahdi) and the commanders [of his army] will rise. On that day Allah will make the Dajjaal appear and he will be crucified on the church of Kufa (Iraq)’. (Bihar Al-Anwar by Mulla Baqir Al-Majlisi, vol. 52, p. 308)
Kufa? Crucifiction? NOWROOZ?! We all know that JESUS (peace be upon him) will kill the Dajjaal, not on the holy day of Shiism though, which is NOWROOZ!
All this Majoosiyyah (Zoroastrianism) is so deeply rooted in their sect that they even celebrate Nowrooz in the shrine (waste of gold and other wealth of gullible Shias) of Al-Hussein in Karbala!
In this video you can see Iranian pilgrims in Iraq (whichis basically occupied by Iran with the help of the Americans and Iraqi Shia puppets) celebrating NOWROOZ in next to the shrine of Al-Hussein Ibn Ali in Karbala’. That’s what these heretics call ‘the Islam of the Ahl Al-Bayt, the true followers of the Sunnah’!
Now if you think that these are maybe some traditional Iranian Shiites who have mixed up their religion (to them Islam) with their cultural traditions the let us dissapoint you. Although it is true that many Arab Shias don’t celebrate Nowrooz, yet the reality of the Shia sect is that this Persian Majoosi holiday is a PRAISED and ESSENTIAL part of their religion, to such a degree that a number of Hadith in PRAISE of Nowrooz have been ascribed to the Ahl Al-Bayt and even preferred deeds that one should do on that day!
Finally, after the long but needed introduction, let us move to the narrations about the savage nd criminal nature of the Rafidhi Mahdi. The following narrations (not just one or two to be easily dismissed by apologetic Shias as weak) will prove to you that the Shia Mahdi is nothing but the impersonation of the likes of Attila The Hun, Yazdgerd III, Al-Hajjaj, Genghis Khan Stalin, Hitler, Khomeini, Bashar Al-Assad and other top-notch sadistic mass-murderers. Actually we are doing being unjust to the aforementioned individuals by comparing them to the Rafidhi saviour (12th Imam), because the Rafidhi Mahdi impersonates nothing but the Dajjaal himself, he is nothing but the manifestation of deep Masonic and Sassanian grudge against the Muslims and Islam. The following mass-murdering imaginary creature has been (ironically) propagated by the Shia propagandists (especially the Iranian regime) as the ‘saviour and hope’ of mankind!
The Shia Rafidhi Mahdi will be a sadistic Anti-Arab bigot, slaughtering them left and right
عن الصادق (عليه السلام): ما بقي بيننا وبين العرب إلا الذبح وأومى بيده إلى حلقه.
بحار الأنوار 52/349غيبة النعماني: 155 باب 13
‘There will be nothing left between us and the Arabs, except slaughter. He then demonstrated the slaughter with his hands at his throat.’ (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar by Al-Majlisi, Vol. 52, p. 349 and Kitab Al-Ghaibah by Al-Numani which is a book on the SHIA Aqeedah conerning the Mahdi, p. 155 chapter 13)
عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام أنه قال: اتق العرب فان لهم خبر سوء أما إنه لم يخرج مع القائم منهم واحد
لغيبة للنعماني ص254 بحار الأنوار 52/ 333
On the authority of Abi Abdillah (Al-Sadiq) who said: ‘Fear the Arabs! لآecause there will be very bad news for them, which is that none from amongst them will come out with Al-Qa’im (Shia Mahdi).” (Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 333-334. This narration has been used as a PROOF by Shia scholars in other AQEEDAH books such as ‘Kitab Al-Ghaiba by Al-Numani, p. 254)
Notice how the narration puts fear and HATE into the hearts of the Shias in regards to the Arabs. Imam Al-Sadiq’s name (an Arab Muslim himself!) is just being misused by the devils who fabricated those narrations to give their Anti-Arab bigotry a religious flavour!
أن المنتظر يسير في العرب بما في الجفر الأحمر، وهو قتلهم
المجلسي في بحار الأنوار 52/ 318
‘Al-Muntadhar (the Awaited One)i) will walk amongst the Arabs and kill them.’ (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 318)
Abu Ja’far (Imam Al-Baqir of the Ahl Al-Bayt, a great scholar from the Salaf whom they ascribed these lies to) (AS) said: “The Qa’im (Mahdi) will arise with a new matter and a NEW book and a new a NEW LAW and he will deal severely with the Arabs, nothing in his matter exists EXCEPT the sword and he will not fear the blame of the blamer”. (Kitab Al-Ghaybah by Al-Tusi, p. 104 who narrated only Shia authentic narrations regarding their Mahdi)
Now why do you think the Sassanian-Majoosi-Zionist sadist of a Rafidhi ‘Mahdi’ will deal SEVERELY with the Arabs (with NO EXCEPTION whatsoever)?! Is it because Arabs drink their famous Arabic coffee or is it because they are the descendants of the Sahabah who put an end to the tryanncial Sassanian Majoosi empire?
Never fall for the Shia apologists lame excuses once you have confronted them with the heretical reality of their sect. Whenever they are cornered they claim that not all their narrations in their Hadith books (such as Bihar Al-Anwar which is more like an encyclopedia of over 100 volumes full of shirk, heresies and perversion) are authentic.Well, while this might be true, yet what needs to be understand is that first of all these narrations put together have been used by Shia scholars themselves. Shia scholars have put these narrations in their books of AQEEDAH, that is why almost every single reference we have provided includes
– Kitab Al-Ghaybah by Mullah Baqir Al-Majlisi (this is basically a part of his ‘Bihar Al-Anwar’). He basically gathered the narration of his predecessor Al-Numani and other.
– Kitab Al-Ghaybah by Muhammad Ibn Ibrahim Ibn Jafar Al-Numani an alleged disciple of Al-Kulayni. His Kitab Al-Ghayba is the most classical and authentic Shia book in regards to the 12th Imam.
– ‘Kitab Al-Ghaybah’ by Abu Jafar Muhammad Ibn Hassan Al-Tusi (from Tus/Khorassan, which is called ‘Mashad’ today in present Iran) who collected only authentic narration in reference to the Shia Mahdi. Don’t take our word, take it straight from the horse’s mouth:
As you can see, the names of the books (or in Majlisi’s case the CHAPTER in his Bihar) are all identical, what is important to understand is that the the narrations we have provide from these books can’t just be dismissed as ‘weak’ narrations, since Shia scholars themselves (see above) have used them in their Aqeedah books (the last two books are books of Aqeedah!) i.e. these are not random narrations. Aqeedah books — even if containing some weak narrations – are overall expressing the belief of a school of thought, hence the only reason the likes of Al-Numani and Al-Tusi have included these shocking narrations in their books is because they believed them to be the creed (Aqeedah) of Shiism in regards to their Mahdi.
Now let us continue with the actual onslaught i.e. the savage reality of the Rafidhi Mahdi and let us provide you with even more shocking evidence (approved even by living Shia authorities!) to ensure you that the shocking narrations you are reading are not some ‘weak and rejected’ Shia Hadith that are randomly being quoted by the opponents of the Shia. See it for yourself that even their living scholars sanctify these Anti-Arab and barbaric narrations in their own books.
Take for instance Ali Al-Korani, a Lebanese Shia scholar who dwells in Iran/Qom. He wrote a WHOLE book (one of the most important books in regards to the Shia belief in the Mahdi in our time!) named ‘Asr Al-Dhuhoor’ (‘The Age of the Apparence’) where he included the following narrations himself:
And on the authority of Imam Al-Sadiq, peace be upon him, who said: ‘Then he will head towards Kufa (Iraq) and descend upon her and spill the blood of SEVENTY tribes of the Arabs.’ (Kitab Al-Ghaybah of Al-Tusi, p. 284)
Al-Korani comments on the Hadith (because even he knows it’s too horrific and Anti-Arab): ‘What is meant here is that the Mahdi will spill the blood of those who deserve it from among those tribes i.e. his enemies and the Khawarij.’
Of course this is NOT what the Rafidhi hadith says! That’s just a watered down version of the actual text that makes no exception at all (especially if we take the other ahadith into consideration which all speak about an onslaught on the Arabs!). The hadith is clear, it says that the Rafidhi Mahdi will slaughter SEVENTY Arab tribes. Do you understand what that means?! It’s not like there are hundreds of Arab tribes out there, let alone thousands! Killing seventy Arab tribes is a genocide, it basically means to annihilate all Arabs (a Zionist and Sassanian Majoosi dream). Can you now see how this monster (who is anything but the true Mahdi) is nothing but the MANIFESTATION of all those Sassanian Majoos and Jews of Madinah and other defeated enemies of the Ummah who created this monster (who is in real nothing but the Dajjaal) to take revenge from the Sahaba/Muslims and the Ummah of Mohammad?!
The Rafidhi Mahdi will amputate the hands of a whole tribe and decorate the Kaaba with it!
I asked, “What is the first thing the Qa’im (Shia Mahdi) will do after he rises?”Imam (a.s.) replied, “He will start with the Bani Shaybah. He will cut their hands off because they are the looters of the House of Allah. (Kaamil Al-Ziyaraat pg 63. and ‘Oyoun Akhbar Al-Redha pg 151)
قول الامام الصادق عليه السلام اذا قام القائم عليه السلام هدم المسجد الحرام حتى يرده الى اساسه وقطع ايدي بني شيبة وعلقها بالكعبة وكتب عليها هؤلاء سراق الكعبة
– الارشاد للشيخ المفيد ص٣٦٤ وكتاب الغيبة للشيخ الطوسي ص٤٧٢
Imam Al-Sadiq, peace be upon him, said: ‘When the Qa’im (Rising Mahdi) appears he will demolish Masjid al-Haraam until it is restored to its original state, then he will dismember (amputate) the hands of the Bani Shaybah, then he will hang their hands on the Kaabah as well as writing on it, ‘these are the hands of the thieves of Kaabah.’” (al-Mufid, Al-Irshaad. pg. 411, At-Tusi, Kitab al Ghaibah, pg. 282)
The Bani Shaybha are an ancient and believing Arab tribe who to THIS VERY DAY are the keyholders of the Kaaaba. The Prophet (صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم) himself entrusted them (and not any of the Ahl Al-Bayt) with the keys of the Kaaba. This isthe DEEP hatred the Rafidha have for the Sahaba and their descendants and their perverted and savage saviour will decorated the Kaaba with amputated hands. This is the one they ask Allah to hasten his reappearance! The irony is that they accuse the Bani Shaybah of being thieves who from generation to generation are are taken the wealth from the poor. The irony is that no one but the Ayatullats can be accused of being thieves who (similar to the ancient Christian clergy and other sects) eat the wealth of their gullible followers in the name of Khums (the one fifth i.e. 20% of ones wealth every Shia has to give to a Shia Ayatullat!)
If you thing it can’t get worse i.e. more barbaric and perverted then you don’t know anything about Shiism. The following website adds some more to the zombie bollywood movie of their Mahdi:
ولا يكتفي الإمام المهدي عليه السلام بقطع أيديهم، بل يأمر بأن يطاف بهم، فقد ورد عن أبي عبد الله عليه السلام، قال: (أمَا إنَّ قائمنا لو قد قام لقد أخذهم – أي بني شيبة – وقطع أيديهم وطاف بهم، وقال: هؤلاء سرّاق الله) (الكافي ٤: ٢٤٣/ ح ٤)، ويمكن أن يقال: إنَّ المقصود هو الرمزية بمعنى أنَّ المتولّين على البيت الحرام تكون أعمالهم وأفعالهم شبيهة ببني شيبة في زمن الجاهلية.(٢) تهذيب الأحكام ٤: ٣٣٣/ ح (١٠٤٤/١١٢).
‘The Imam (peace be upon him) will not only dismember (amputate) their hands, rather he will order (the people) to circumambulate (Tawaaf) around them (the Kaaba decorated with amputated hands!). It has been narrated on the authority of Aba Abdillah (Al-Sadiq), peace be upon him, who said: “‘When the Qa’im (Rising Mahdi) rises he will get hold of them – i.e. the Bani Shaybah – and dismember (amputate) their hands and circumambulate (Tawaaf) around it (Kaaba with amputed hangs on it!), he said: these are (the hands) of the thieves of Allah”.
Allahu Al-Musta’aan! Allaah is the One whose help is sought! Can it get more perverted and bestial?! Can you even imagine a Zionist of the Ariel Sharon type doing such things?! This is their Mahdi, this is the reality which is hidden to many even to many gullible Shia who have a romanticised perception about this mass-murdering monster, not knowing that Islam, the Ahl Al-Bayt and the REAL Mahdi being innocent of this Dajjaal, this Zionist and Sassanian spawn.
The Rafidhi Mahdi will have a special thirst for the blood of the Quraysh!
ص243 كتاب الغيبة للنعماني
عن ابى عبد الله عليه السلام انه قال”اذا خرج القائم لم يكن بينه وبين العرب وقريش الا السيف ما ياخذ منها الا السيف
On the authority of Abi Abdillah (Al-Sadiq), peace be upon him, who said: ‘When the Qa’im emerges there will be nothing left between him and the Arabs and the QURAYSH except the SWORD‘. (Al-Ghaybah by Al-Numani)
Notice how the Quraysh are being mentioned separately! Prophet Mohammad’s tribe who in their masses are nothing but Sunni Muslims!
بحار الأنوار – ج ٥٢ – الصفحة ٣٥٤
عن أبي جعفر (عليه السلام) يقول: لو يعلم الناس ما يصنع القائم إذا خرج لأحب أكثرهم أن لا يروه مما يقتل من الناس، أما إنه لا يبدأ إلا بقريش فلا يأخذ منها إلا السيف ولا يعطيها إلا السيف حتى يقول كثير من الناس: ليس هذا من آل محمد لو كان من آل محمد لرحم
‘On the authority of Abi Ja’far (Imam Al-Baqir), peace be upon him, who said: “As mankind realize what is going to be done by Al-Qaim (Shia’s Mahdi) when he appears, most people will prefer not to see him because of the killings he will do to mankind, it makes most mankind say: ‘ He is not from the House of Mohammad, if he were from the House of Mohammad, he would certainly have compassion (Ghaybah of Al-Numani and in Bihar Al-Anwar, vol. 53, p. 354 )
On the following Shia website they have simply OMITTED the part where the Shia Mahdi will KILL the people (especially the Quraysh) left and right:
يروي المفيد عن أبي عبدالله أنه قال
إذا قام القائم من آل محمد عليهم السلام أقام خمسمائة من قريش فيضرب أعناقهم ثم خمسمائة أخر حتى يفعل ذلك ست مرات
‘On the authority of Abi Abdillah (Imam Al-Sadi) who said: “When the Qa’im from the family of Mohammad, peace be upon him, rises, he will resurrect five hundred from Quraish (dead people of Prophet Mohammad’s tribe) and cut off their necks, then another five hundred, until he does this (action) six times.” (Al-Mufid in his Al-Irshad)
This is their sadistic ‘saviour’! Ironically the Shias (the likes of Hassan Nasrallah and other prominent sneaky politicians and Taqiyyah monger scholars) are quick to ascribe the cutting of the head (even in war) as a ‘barbaric Wahhabi practice’. The irony is that their rabid saviour will not just cut off necks (of over 500 DEAD people), but he will resurrect them (like in a Zombie movie) just for the sake of chopping their heads off! All together six times!
Now the question may arise: How on earth could the Rafidha fool and lure a few (Shias are to this very day a TINY minority not just among the Arabs worldwide but even amongst the non-Arabs and in fact even among MANY Persians such as the Persians population of Afghanistan and Tajikistan who are overwhelmingly Sunni) Arabs into Shiism? Well, the answer lies in some additional fabricated narrations that are somehow the only hope for the Arab Shias (obviously only a weak minded person will miss the bigger picture, i.e. that the default scenario is that ALL Arabs will be slaughtered by the Masonic-Sassanian Rafidhi saviour
‘Imam Jafar Al-Sadiq was asked: “How many of those who accompany the Q’im are Arabs?” Ja’far said “Very few“; then someone said, “But numerous are the Arabs who profess this Cause,” and Ja’far replied, “People will inevitably be chosen, separated, siftyed through; many are those who will fall through the sifter.” (Kitab Al-Ghaybah by Al-Numani, chapter 12, pp.298-299.)
Imam Mohammad al-Baqir said that all 313 companions of the Qaim are the sons of Persians (Ajams) . (Kitab Al-Ghaybah by Al-Numani, chapter 20, page 448.)
Remember in other narrations the Arabs can expect nothing but slaughter and not a SINGLE of them will be spared …
“Fear the Arabs because there will be very bad news for them, which is that none from amongst them will come out with Al-Qa’im (Shia’s Mahdi).” (Baqir Al-Majlisi, Bihar Al-Anwar, Vol. 52, p. 333, and ‘Kitab Al-Ghaiba by Al-Numani, p. 254)
… In the end of the day it doesn’t matter if ALL of the Arabs will be slaughtered or if SOME (at best!) will be spared, the bottom line is that the Rafidhi Mahdi is from the progeny of the Sassanian Majoos who along with the defeated Jews infiltrated the Ummah and used Tashayyu’ (Shiism) as a hideout to destroy Islam from within. They have paved the way for the Dajjaal, the Anti-Christ, the enemy of the Islamic Ummah. They have drilled whole generations to believe that the so called 12th Imam (the so called son of Imam Al-Askari, a pious man who never had a son in the first place) is the saviour of mankind, the son of Fatimah, the descandent of the Messenger of Allah, yet in reality (and we are not even finished analysing his Jewish-Masonic attributes) he is nothing but a mass-murdering, perverted and blood thirsty monster, so no wonder that the scholars of Islam say that once the REAL Dajjaal appear the likes of the Shias (and probably other heretics) will mistake that devil for the Mahdi and the REAL Mahdi for the Dajjaal.
For more shocking facts about the Sassanian-Majoosi reality of the Rafidhi Mahdi visit the following Iranian Sunni blog:
D I S C L A I M E R:
During the period of Muslim rule in Spain, Imam Abu Muhammad Ibn Hazm would often debate with the Catholic priests about their religious texts. He brought before them evidence of textual distortions in the Bible and the loss of the original manuscripts. When they replied by pointing out the (Imamite) Shia claims that the Qur’an has been distorted and altered, Ibn Hazm informed them that Shia claims were not valid evidence because the Shia were not themselves Muslims.
So bear in mind there Muslim visitor that Shiism nor any personality in Shiism -including the Mahdi who is respected by all Muslims and will be born at the end of times with COMPLETELY different description as in the perverted and sadistic Shia texts -have anything WHATSOEVER to do with Islam. Islam is innocent of Shiism and Shiism is innocent of Islam.