About Gift2Shias

They say whoever despises the Rafida (so called followers of Ahl Al-Bayt) is a Nasib (enemy of Ahl Al-Bayt), we say: Whoever attributes Rafidism to the Ahl Al-Bayt is a Zindiq and Kafir.

Who was behind gathering Quran in one book?

as Salam Alaykum.

Hafiz ibn Kasir in his “Fadhail al-Quran” (p 44, Darul Itisam, Turkey) said:

“Like it was reported by imams like Waki (ibn al-Jarrah), (Abdurrahman) ibn al-Mahdi and Kabisa, Ali ibn Abi Talib (radi Allahu anh said):

The one who got greatest reward in regard to scrolls of Quran is Abu Bakr! The one who first gathered Quran between two covers was Abu Bakr”.

(Ibn Kasir said) – The chain of this report is sound”.



Shia source: He forgot Quran.

as Salam alaykum.

Did prophet forget anything? As a Ahlesunnah, we do believe he didn’t forget anything from revelation, or any shariah related issues.

As for shias?

مختصر البصائر – الحسن بن سليمان الحلى – ص 284 – 285
 وعنه ومحمد بن الحسين بن أبي الخطاب وغيرهما عن أحمد بن محمد بن أبي نصر ، عن هشام بن سالم ، عن سعد بن طريف الخفاف ، قال : قلت لأبي جعفر ( عليه السلام ) : ما تقول فيمن أخذ عنكم علما فنسيه ؟ قال : ” لا حجة عليه ، إنما الحجة على من سمع منا حديثا فأنكره ، أو بلغه فلم يؤمن به وكفر ، فأما النسيان فهو موضوع عنكم . إن أول سورة نزلت على رسول الله ( صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم ) * ( سبح اسم ربك الأعلى ) * فنسيها ، فلم يلزمه حجة في نسيانه ، ولكن الله تبارك وتعالى أمضى له ذلك ، ثم قال  سنقرئك فلا تنسى “.


“Mukhtasar al-Basair” by al-Hasan ibn Sulayman al-Hilli, pages 284-285.

“And from him, and from Muhammad ibn al-Husayn ibn Abul Khattab and others, from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Abu Nasr, from Hisham ibn Salim, from Sayyed ibn Tareef al-Khaffaf, which said: I asked from Abu Jafar (alaihi salam): “What do you say about person who took knowledge from you and forgot?” He said: “No argument against him for this, argument against man who heard hadith from us, and rejected it. Or it (hadith) was narrated to him and he didn’t believe it, and disbelieved (by this). As for forgetfulness, it is (known) thing from them. First chapter (surah) revealed upon prophet (sallalahu alayhi wa alihi) was – “Glorify the name of thy Guardian-Lord Most High” (87/1), and HE FORGOT IT, (but) there was no need for him an argument in forgetting it, but Allah blessed and exalted arrange this for him, then said (by saying?): “We will make you recite so you shall not forget” (87/6).



True Quran is with Mahdi!

as Salam Alaykum.

Book: al-Maalimul Aqidah.

Author: Shaykh al-Haydar al-Wakeel.

p 45 (screen shot):

“6-عقيدتنا في القران 

و القران هو الكتاب المنزل من الله تعالى على نبيه و رسوله محمد بن عبد الله ( صلى الله عليه واله) في ثلاث و عشرين سنة و فيه علم كل شيء مما يحتاجه الناس يعرفه اهله الذين انزل القران في بيوتهم و فيه اصول العقيدة الحقة و فروع الاحكام و بيان و هدى للمتقين .
و ما بين الدفتين قرآن لم يُزد فيه و الظاهر من طريقة جمعه ان فيه تغييرا في مواضع بعض الايات .

و قرآن علي هو القران كما أُنزل دون ادنى تغيير و هو عند الائمة الهداة(صلوات الله عليهم ) و يُظهر صاحب العصر الامام المهدي (صلوات الله عليه ) عند ظهوره و ينصب الفساطيط لإصحابه يُعلمون القران كما أُنزل . “

  – 6. Our faith in Quran.

“And Quran is a book revealed from Allah upon his messenger and prophet Muhammad ibn Abdullah (sallalahu alayhi wa alihi) in 23 years. And it contain all things needed to people, which known by its family, in which house been revealed Quran. And in it foundations of true faith, and branches of rulings, statement and guidance to the righteous. And between the two covers is Quran, and there is nothing added there. Apparent from the method of (Quran) collection that there is a change in the positions of some verses. And Quran of Ali is the Quran as revealed without the slightest change, and it is with Imams of Guidance (salawatullahi alayhim). Owner of century imam al-Mahdi would reveal this (Quran) upon his appearance…”


Shia scholar: Multiple narrations testify about disbelief of sunnis.

as Salam Alaykum.

Book: al-Mahasin an-Nafsaniyah fi Ajwibatal Masail Khorasaniyah.

Author: Shaykh Husayn ibn Muhammad al-Usfur al-Bahrani.

Cover page here and text here.

“and what is clear (apparent) to us from reports that is disbelief of all opponents and their shirk. And that they are worse than Jews and Christians, and whoever believe that they have portion in Islam is disbeliever (himself)”

Ali (ra) didn’t make takfir on ANYONE fighting him!

Yet more evidence that Ali (ra) wasn’t upon the Aqeedah of the extremist Rafidah who excommunicate every single Sahabi who was involved (in a time of Fitnah confusion!) in a battle against this great man, as if Ali if fighting Ali equals fighting god (fabricated narration)! Ali was upon the Sunni creed of forgiving his brothers the Sahabah and expected others to forgive him to and that despite the differences, the Sahaba were brothers upon one faith and creed:

Imran bin Talha came to Ali and was greeted by him. Imran said: You greet me (in this kind manner) after killing my father?

Ali then said: I hope that your father and I are from those that Allah said about them:
And We will root out whatever of rancor is in their breasts– (they shall be) as brethren, on raised couches, face to face. (al-Hijr)

A man from the tribe of Hamdan then said: Allah is more just than to do such a thing!

Ali then screamed, which shook the house: THEN WHO IS THIS (verse) ABOUT IF IT ISN’T ABOUT US?!

Tabaqat Ibn Sa’ad 3/205 (saheeh)

This is the true Ali, the Ali who wished he wasn’t alive during the time of the Fitna of Al-Jamal.

On that day, Ali (ra) said to his son al-Hasan (ra), “I wish I had died twenty years ago.”

Perverted fiqh of fasting

as Salam Alaykum.

Present for all shias, especially considering that Ramadan is almost here.

Book: “at-Tanqih al-Mabani al-Urwa – Kitab as-Sawm”. Cover HERE; text HERE.

Link to the book:


Author: Mirza al-Jawad at-Tabrizi.

This scholar said:

Malasah 11: If man made intercourse with hermaphrodite from the front (vagina), his and her fast is not broken. Same ruling if hermaphrodite made an intercourse with female, even from rear, but if man sodomized hermaphrodite from rear, their both fast been interrupted. If man entered to hermaphrodite, and hermaphrodite (at the same time) entered to female, fast of hermaphrodite only been broken. If two hermaphrodites sodomized each other, their fast is not broken.




Agreed opinion of takfir of sunnis

Book: “at-Takfir fi dawa al-fiqh al-Shii” (p 54)

Author: Shaykh Muhammad Ridha al-Ansari al-Qummi.

In chapter two – Ahl as-Sunnah, this shia scholar said:

Cover page HERE. Text HERE.

Words of Imami scholars in fiqh agreed upon takfir of opponents, and for your saying of scholars of past and later time

After this, shaykh quoted such scholars like:

  1. Shaykh Mufid.
  2. Shaykh at-Tusi
  3. Sayyid Murtada
  4. ibn Idris al-Hilli.
  5. Allamah al-Hilli.
  6. Shahid ath-Thani.
  7. Mawla Abu Salih al-Mazandarani.


Ibn Shahrashub and Surah al Wilayah

In the book “al-Mualam al-Ulamah” of ibn Shahrashub (p 257 on the right of the scan) written: (799) Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Shahrashub author of this book, he wrote: 1905 – Kitab Manaqib al Abi Talib. 1906 – alMathalib an-Nawasib”.

In the book of Muhammad Hasan l-Ishtiyani “Bahrul Fawaid fi Sharh al-Faraid” (1/475 on the left side of the scan) written: “Yes, from shaykh Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Shahrashub al-Mazandarani in his known book “al-Mathalib”: They dropped from Quran complete surah al-Wilayah

Imam Al-Baqir: The Rafidah are ignorant of the Sunnah!:

حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْفَضْلِ، بِمِصْرَ قَالَ: نَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ شَرِيكٍ، قَالَ: نَا عُقْبَةُ بْنُ مُكْرَمٍ، قَالَ: نَا يُونُسُ بْنُ بُكَيْرٍ , عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ , عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَلِيٍّ قَالَ: مَنْ لَمْ يَعْرِفْ فَضْلَ أَبِي بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا فَقَدْ جَهِلَ السُّنَّةَ

فضائل الصحابة للدارقطني

[…] Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. ‘Ali (Al-Baqir) said: “Who does not know the virtues of Abu Bakr and ‘Omar, may Allah be pleased with him, is ignorant of the Sunnah.” [Fada’il Al-Sahabah by Al-Daraqutni, also in the Musnad, Fada’il Al-Sahabah by Imam Ahmad]

Detailed article about Imam Al-Baqir>>>

Muhammad al-Baqir narrated more hadith in Sahih Muslim than …

… the Siddiq, Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quhafa. Yes, there more ahadith recorded through Muhammad al-Baqir in the Sahih of Imam Muslim than there is through Abu Bakr. Then the Rafidah want us to believe that Sunnis are the result of Umayyad fabrications and that they barely narrated from the Ahl al-Bayt and that in order to love and take narrations from the Ahl al-Bayt one must become a Twelver Rafidi (نعوذ بالله).

Imam Muhammad bin ‘Ali (AL-BAQIR)

Al-Dhahabi al-Turkistani in his famous Siyar A’lam an-Nubala`:

Continue reading

Sayyidunā ʻAlī’s favorite Ayah of the Qurʼān

No, it wasn’t a single of this misused verses, ambigious evidences the Rafidah use for his alleged Wilayah.

Ali bin Abi Talib {May Allah be well pleased with him} said:

“There is no Ayat/Verse in the Quran more beloved to me than this Verse:

“Truly, Allah does not forgive associating others with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whomever He wills. {Quran, 4:116).”

عَلِيِّ بْنِ أَبِي طَالِبٍ، قَالَ مَا فِي الْقُرْآنِ آيَةٌ أَحَبُّ إِلَىَّ مِنْ هَذِهِ الآيَةِ : إِنَّ اللَّهَ لاَ يَغْفِرُ أَنْ يُشْرَكَ بِهِ وَيَغْفِرُ مَا دُونَ ذَلِكَ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ )

{Sunan at-Tirmidhi ~ The Chapter on Tafsir of the Quran}

He – like the Ahlus-Sunnah – was first and foremost concerned with Tawhid and the dangerous of shirk, topics you barely hear the Rafidah speaking of (for obvious reasons).