Saduq questioned again!

Praise to Allah in our previous posts we show to our dear readers complete unreliability of know shia scholar ibn Babaweyh al-Qummi shaykh Saduq in the light of the words of shia shaykhs (1, 2).

Now we would like to present to you another proof, how this Saduq altered report, by adding to it words, when he need it.  Continue reading

Rafed.net and usage of Sunni Hadith

In their book “Kitab Mawaddat Ahlal Bayt wal Fadailuhum” shias from rafed.net quoted hadith from our books:

Messenger (sallalahu alaihi wa ali) said: “Most steady on the bridge would be feet of those who are most severe in the love of ahlalbayt”.

And in the footnote you can see references to Kanzul Ummal and Sawaiq al-Muhriqa.

Let us check those books for this report. Continue reading

Sami al-Badri’s alteration of Naubahti’s words.

Hasan Musa Naubahti, one of the known and famous shia shaykhs of the past, in his “Firaqu shia” said:

“Some people of knowledge  from companions of Ali said that: “Abdulla ibn Saba was yahudi who accepted islam. He was supporter of Ali . While a Jew, he propounded the exaggerative notion that Yusha ibn Nun was divinely appointed to succeed Prophet Musa, after accepting islam, he adopted a similar stance with regard to `Ali in relation to the Holy Prophet (after his death). He (ibn Saba) was the first man who told that believe in imamat of Ali is obligatory, and he openly violated his enemies (i.e. the first three Caliphs) and branded them as infidels. That is why those who opposses to shia say:”The origin of Rafd is thus based on Judaism””

First edition: Continue reading

Alteration of Kitab Sulaim ibn Qays al-Hilali

Shia is very strange sect, they try to corrupt everything what they can. Even book which is not authentic in the view of their ulama, didn’t succeed to escape from the hands of shia editors.

In book which is attributed to Sulaim ibn Qays al-Hilali, at page 423 (thq Muhammad Baqir al-Ansari), you can read: Continue reading

Nematullah Jazairi about tahrif

This known shia muhadith said in his book “al-Anwar an-Nomaniyah” (1/97):

“Don’t be surprised by many fabricated ahadeth. Because (companions) made some changes and turns in the religion after prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ali), and the greatest thing from this, is their changing of Quran and tampering words in it. And they took from it verses with praise of ali-Rasul and aimma tahirin and blame of hypocrites and opening of their deeds, as it would be explained in Nurul-Quran (1)“.

As far as I understand “Noor al-Quran” that should be a chapter in this “Anwaru Numaniyah”, but I couldn’t find it in printed edition of this book.

Here you can see complete fihritst of 4 volumes of this book:

As you can clearly see there is no chapter “Noor al-Quran” in this book!

The Tahreef (corruption) of the books of Aqa Burzugh el-Tehrani

Bismillah,

“Ma’a Mawsou’at Rijal al-Shia” is a book written by al-‘Allamah al-Sayyed ‘Abdullah Sharaf al-Deen al-Musawi which discusses the encyclopaedias of Shia Rijal, here the author talks about the books of the famous Shia scholar Aqa Burzugh el-Tehrani, mainly “al-Thari’ah fi Tasaneef al-Shia” and “Tabaqat A’alam al-Shia” both books were written by al-Tehrani to gather all the works of the Shia scholars throughout the ages and the Tabaqat of the famous Shias in history.

Continue reading

Alteration of hadith from Kafi in book of Kashani

First of all let me quote here hadith directly from “Kafi” by al-Kulayni.

Kulayni narrated in his “al-Kafi” (1/65), and Majlisi said it’s hasan (good):

3 – علي بن إبراهيم، عن أبيه، عن ابن أبي نجران، عن عاصم بن حميد، عن منصور بن حازم قال: قلت لابي عبدالله عليه السلام: ما بالي أسألك عن المسألة فتجيبني فيها بالجواب، ثم يجيئك غيري فتجيبه فيها بجواب آخر؟ فقال: إنا نجيب الناس على الزيادة والنقصان، قال: قلت: فأخبرني عن أصحاب رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله صدقوا على محمد صلى الله عليه وآله أم كذبوا؟ قال: بل صدقوا، قال: قلت: فما بالهم اختلفوا؟ فقال: أما تعلم أن الرجل كان يأتي رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله فيسأله عن المسألة فيجيبه فيها بالجواب ثم يجيبه بعد ذلك ما ينسخ ذلك الجواب، فنسخت الاحاديث بعضها بعضا.

Ali ibn Ibrahim has narrated from his father from ibn Abi Najran from ‘Asim ibn Humayd from Mansur ibn Hazim who has said:”I said to (Imam) abu ‘Abdallah (alaihi salam), ‘It is confuses me that when I ask you a question and you give an answer and then other person comes and you give a different answer for the same question.’” The Imam replied, “We answer people in a larger and reduced forms.” I then asked, “Did the Sahabah, companions of the holy Prophet speak the truth or lies when narrating his Hadith?” The Imam replied, “They spoke the truth.” I then said, “Why then they have differences?” Have you not considered the fact that a man would come to the holy Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ali) and ask a question and would give him an answer and then he would answer that would abrogate the previous answer. Thus, Ahadith abrogated other Ahadith.”

Kafi – screen shot:

Let us see how this hadith was altered in book of Faydh al-Kashani “Usul al-Asilat”:

وفي الكافي في باب اختلاف الحديث باسناد حسن عن منصور بن حازم (١) قال: قلت لأبي عبد الله (ع): ما بالي أسألك عن المسألة فتجيبني فيها بالجواب ثم يجيئك غيري فتجيبه بجواب آخر؟ ـ فقال: انا نجيب الناس على الزيادة والنقصان، قال: قلت: فأخبرني عن أصحاب رسول الله (ص) صدقوا على محمد (ص) أم كذبوا؟ ـ فقال: اما تعلم أن الرجل كان يأتي رسول الله (ص) فيسأله عن المسألة فيجيبه فيها بالجواب ثم يجيئه بعد ذلك ما ينسخ ذلك الجواب فنسخت الأحاديث بعضها بعضا.

In Kafi, chapter regarding ikhtilaf al-hadith by hasan chain from Mansur ibn Hazim who has said:”I said to (Imam) abu ‘Abdallah (alaihi salam), ‘It is confuses me that when I ask you a question and you give an answer and then other person comes and you give a different answer for the same question.’” The Imam replied, “We answer people in a larger and reduced forms.” I then asked, “Did the Sahabah, companions of the holy Prophet speak the truth or lies when narrating his Hadith?” (****omission*****)  Have you not considered the fact that a man would come to the holy Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ali) and ask a question and would give him an answer and then he would answer that would abrogate the previous answer. Thus, Ahadith abrogated other Ahadith.”

You see? How in their attempt to hide testimony from imam that companions didn’t lie upon prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam), shias omitted his words?

Omitted partThe Imam replied, “They spoke the truth.” I then said, “Why then they have differences?”

Majlisi accuse as-Saduq in alteration.

In the book “Rawdat al-Muttaqin” part 5 page 440 under “Kitab al-Hajj” in the section of the visit of the grave of the two Imams Musa bin Ja’afar (rah) and Abu Ja’afar al-Thani (rah), the Shia scholar al-Majlisi accuses the other Shia scholar al-Saduq of altering the Du’ah which has to be said at their graves in Baghdad.

Continue reading

Irshad al-Qulub – another alteration?

Once upon a time there was a shia scholar and his name was al-Hasan ibn Abul Hasan ad-Daylami. In his book “Irshad al-Qulub” (see scans) he said:

Majlisi mentioned in volume 9 of his book Bihar al-Anwar, and Sayeed al-Bahrani in the book “al-Madinatul Majaiz”…

Someone could say: So what? One shia narrated from other.

But the problem is:

1) ad-Daylami died in 841 h, as said Muhsin al-Ameen.

2) Majlisi died in 1111 h.

3) Bahrani died in 1107 or 1109.

Sh.Saduq’s games with hadith wording

Here is a SAHIH Shia Hadith from al-Kafi 4/136:

أَبُو عَلِيٍّ الْأَشْعَرِيُّ عَنْمُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الْجَبَّارِ عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ مَهْزِيَارَ قَالَ كَتَبْتُإِلَيْهِ ( عليه السلام ) امْرَأَةٌ طَهُرَتْ مِنْ حَيْضِهَا أَوْمِنْ دَمِ نِفَاسِهَا فِي أَوَّلِ يَوْمٍ مِنْ شَهْرِ رَمَضَانَ ثُمَّاسْتَحَاضَتْ فَصَلَّتْ وَصَامَتْ شَهْرَ رَمَضَانَ كُلَّهُ مِنْ غَيْرِ أَنْتَعْمَلَ مَا تَعْمَلُ الْمُسْتَحَاضَةُ مِنَ الْغُسْلِ لِكُلِّ صَلَاتَيْنِفَهَلْ يَجُوزُ صَوْمُهَا وَ صَلَاتُهَا أَمْ لَا فَكَتَبَ ( عليه السلام ) تَقْضِي صَوْمَهَا وَ لَا تَقْضِي صَلَاتَهَا إِنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ (صلى الله عليه وآله ) كَانَ يَأْمُرُ فَاطِمَةَ صَلَوَاتُاللَّهِ عَلَيْهَا وَ الْمُؤْمِنَاتِ مِنْ نِسَائِهِ بِذَلِكَ ـ

Abu ‘Ali al-Asha’ari from Muhammad ibn ‘Abdul-Jabbar from ‘Ali ibn Mehzayar: I wrote to him(Imam) may peace be upon him: A woman was purified from her Haydh(bleeding in Menstruation) on the first day of the month of Ramadhan then she had Istihadah(False Menstruation) and she fasted and prayed during the entire month of Ramadhan without …

Continue reading