Ali refused to be caliph – shia report

Sh. Saduq in “Ilal ush sharae” (p 170):

COVER PAGE

فقال العباس: يا أمير المؤمنين يا ابا الحسن أشرت عليك في يوم قبض رسول الله ان تمد يدك فنبايعك فإن هذا الامر لمن سبق إليه فعصيتني حتى بويع أبو بكر

Translation:

Abbas said (to Ali): O commander of faithful, O Abul Hasan, I make a hint to you in the day the soul of messenger of Allah departed, to stretch your hand, and we would pledge (allegiance) to you. Even if this matter was already for you, but you disobeyed me, till it was pledged to Abu Bakr.

So, why person who was appointed by messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) refused people to pledge allegiance to him?

 

Imam on the name of Noah (alaihi salam)

as-Saduq in “Ilal ash-sharae” (chapter 20) narrated from Imam Abu Abdullah:

1 – (Chain) Imam Abu Abdullah: Noah’s name was Abdulghafar, he was called Noah because he made noaha upon himself.

2 – (Chain) Imam Abu Abdullah: Noah’s name was Abdulmalik, he was called Noah because he cried for 500 years.

3 – (Chain) Imam Abu Abdullah: Noah’s name was AbdulAla, he was called Noah because he was crying for 500 years.

One masoom Imam and 3 versions?

Prophet, Sahabah and Ahl Al-Bayt about praying at/near graves – WISDOM SERIES

Al-Mustafa blocked every path leading to Shirk to Protect Tawheed. His companions followed his footsteps, so did his progeny. Yet, those who CLAIM to follow his progeny did the EXACT of what the Prophet (peace be upon him) had ordered!

He even forbad us to take his grave as a place of worship (NOTE: His – peace be upon him – grave is actually NOT part of the Prophet’s Mosque. Proof >>>), yet the Mushrikoon of today have taken the graves of Imams/”Ayatollah’s” etc. as places of worship!

Imams continue misguiding the nation

The Imam according to the Shia intentionally misleads and misguides his followers as well as the mainstream Muslims (sunnah), in this topic we will quote the narrations quoted by the Shia scholar Yusuf al-Bahrani in the introduction of his book “al-Hadaeq al-Nadirah”, we read: Continue reading

Marriages of Hasan and narrations about divorces

In two of our previous posts we have discussed marriages of Imam Hasan (1,2).  We – Ahlesunnah, love all companions and respect them, but shias which say that Hasan was masoom, should think about his marriages, and reports about divorces  from shia books which we want to present.

At-Tabarsi in his “Makarim al-Ahlaq” p 256 wrote:

Translation:

From him (alaihi salam), he said: Marry, and don’t divorce, because Arsh shakes due to divorce.
From him (alaihi salam), he said: Marry and don’t divorce, because Allah doesn’t love zaqin and zaqat.

In footnote it is explained that zaqin and zaqat mean men and women which marry and divorce a lot.

Kulayni in Kafi (6/54) narrated:

(10657) 2 علي بن إبراهيم عن أبيه عن ابن أبي عمير عن غير واحد عن أبي عبد الله (ع) قال: ما من شيء مما أحله الله عز وجل أبغض إليه من الطلاق وإن الله يبغض المطلاق الذواق

From Abu Abdullah (alaihi salam): Amongst things which Allah made permissible there is nothing more hateful for Him than divorce.

Majlisi in Mirat said report is hasan, Bahrani in Haqaiq (25/146) said it is hasan or saheeh.

We don’t blame Hasan (r.a) due to his divorces, he was sahabi, and he would be master of youth in paradise. But you shias, you claim that he was masoom, ask your shuyukh, how is it possible for masoom to do so many acts which anger Allah?

The Forgotten Martyrs of Karbala

forgottenEveryone might have seen the Shia Rafidah banners in Arabic and sometimes even in English language. Massive banners (bloody as usual) with the heroes of Karbala like:

– Al-Hussein

– Abal-Fadhl Al-‘Abbas (Al-Hussein’s brother)

– Zainab (Al-Hussein’s sister who didn’t become Shaheed)

– Ali Akbar and Ali Asghar (sons of Al-Hussein, the latter an INFANT!)

May Allah be pleased with all of them. You see, they even remember INFANTS, yet have you ever heard their “Ayatollahs” and demagogues encouraging the gullible Shia masses to yell:

“Yaaaaaaaa ABU BAKR”!!!!!!!!! or “Yaaaaaaaa OMAR”!!!!!!!!!

No? Well, of course Abu Bakr and Omar (may Allah be pleased with them both) are the enemies of these deviants, yet we did not intent Abu Bakr Ibn Abi Quhafah, the Khalifah of the MUSLIMS or Omar bin Al-Khattab the second Khalifah of the Muslims. No, who we meant were:

Continue reading

Shias will never succeed (by brother Efendi)

:Salam:

Each sect, religion is living in struggle in attempt to convert people into their faith. By grace of Allah, we are on the right path, and as prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) promised there would be group which would be on the true path till the end.

Why shias would never succeed?

1) Because they are basing their dawah on emotions and useless debates. Why such and such man 1300 years ago did such and such thing? Why such and such person 1300 years ago looked at other with anger? And etc.

Allah send this religion, and all other religions not to establish Imamate! Kalla! But to establish Tawhid. I heard shia speeches in live, by net, listen to cds with their talks. HOW MUCH PERCENT THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT TAWHID OF IBADAH? Honestly?!

I can say: ZERO! All that you would hear there: 1) Zulumat ahlalbayt. 2) Karamat ahlalbayt. 3) Sins of companions. 4) Perfection of ahlaq.

But in reality question should be: DO THEY HAVE TAWHID AL-IBADAH? I am not sure about their mutekademin, but modern shias, almost per 99% involved in the worshipping to ahlalbayt, instead of worshipping to Allah.

Can we blame their laymen due to that? I don’t think so. How on earth they can understand that they have to worship to Allah, if their scholars say to them, that calling Allah alone in shirk! And it should be only along with Ya Ali!? (Everybody seen al-KORANI saying that, check our blog).

By putting lable “tawasul” shia scholars approved for their laymen worse types of shirk. Ask 10 shias which you know. what is shirk in ibada? And see how many of them would answer.

2) Innovations. Hypocrites amongst shias, both laymen and scholars accusing sayidina Umar in innovating tarawih! And after that they are going to their mosques and hearing name of Ali in azan! And they are keeping silence on that!! Why? Because in reality they don’t give a damn if such and such thing is innovation or not. All that they want is to accuse companions. And on the same hand they have been involved in all kind of innovations which are possible.

3) Double standards in accepting of shariah texts. I can say with full confidence and proof that, majority of shias which claim to be usuli, and in reality nothing but akhbaris! They are becoming usuli and checking authenticy only if text isn’t suitable for them.
Everything what is suitable is accepted. May be one in the 1000 000 would care – is it authentic?

4) Lack of reason.
What is main foundation of Islam? Quran and Sunnah. Who strived hard for delivering them to us? Who gathered Quran? Who narrated sunnah? COMPANIONS! By agreement in our rows and by testimony of some shias (Tabatabai for example) – Quran was compiled in one book by companions! The very same companions which were accused by shias in KUFR, HYPOCRISY AND EVEN KILLING OF PROPHET (SALLALAHU ALAIHI WA ALA ALIHI WA SALLAM)!
How on earth is it possible to believe in book which was gathered by disbelievers?! That’s why I am sure, that scholars of shias don’t believe in this Holy Book. They are waiting for book which is with their hidden Imam. Same with laymen, and exception is in some of them, which prefer just turn of their brains and close eyes on such contradiction between their belief (COMPANIONS APOSTATED) and claim that they do believe in Quran which was compiled by those apostates!

As for sunnah! Praise to Allah everything is in front of us, as if it in the light of powerful searchlights! We have our usul, and principles in acceptance and rejecting ahadeth. And shias have their desires, only! Desire to accept what is suitable for them, and to reject what is not.
Just look! How many ahadeth from prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) directly narrated we, and how many narrated shias?! See their “Kafi”, and search with pathfinders in it for ahadeth narrated directly from prophet :[S.A.W.W]: ! By Allah they have neglected our beloved prophet:[S.A.W.W]: by inventing idea that what Imam said he said from prophet :[S.A.W.W]:

Imamate and ahadeth

We all know that  shias can’t find verse in Quran which would order Muslims in clear form to believe in Imamate of 12 imams.

But what about ahadeth? Is there evidence in them? What shias usually using? Saqalain, Hadith of Cloak, Hadith of 12 Caliphs and etc. But in none of them we can’t see nass, yanee clear cut indication that Muslims should believe in the Imamate of 12 persons. All that we can see from shias: Such and such hadith indicated this. Such and such mean that.

Imamate can’t be consider as doctrine established on clear proofs, it could be only theory which is basing on interpretations of different texts.

Shias can say that there are ahadeth in their sources, and our sources intentionally corrupted or didn’t mention them. Tayib but Quran? Quran isn’t corrupted. How is it possible that doctrine which is pillar of your mazhab isn’t mentioned clearly in any verse? Let alone fact that 12 imams not mentioned, even faith in Imamate in itself also wasn’t mentioned by Allah.

What are you doing? You are taking verses like: Verse of Wilayah, Mawaddah and Purification and atc, and only and only by explaining them, by giving to them your understanding which is for sure isn’t apparent, you are trying to proof high rank of ahlalbayt (which is in fact indisputable). But Imamate? Why you are not surprised that Allah didn’t say even once: O believers have a faith in Imamate!?