Shaykh of shias at-Tusi in his “Talkhis ash shafi” 4/131 said: Continue reading
Shaykh Hasan al-Husayni al-Wasani in his book “Nurul afham fi ilmul kalam” 2/52-53 said: Continue reading
In his book “Sharhul Ziyaratul Jamiyah” p 150, known and respected shia scholar said:
[ وقد دلت أخبار كثيرة على كفر المخالفين يحتاج جمعها إلى كتاب مفرد]
And a lot of narrations shows to disbelief of opposition (1), (so much narrations) that there is a need in gathering them all in independent book.
1) Mean those who opposes truth in shia understanding.
Salam alaikum, let me first introduce this shia scholar to dear reader. Nothing but a quote from shia site (quoted from ahlulbaytportal): Continue reading
Muhammad Baqir al-Majlisi in his “Biharul Anwar” (38/14) narrated:
وروى عن عطية قال: سئل جابر بن عبد الله عن علي قال: ذاك خير البشر ولا يشك فيه إلا منافق. وعن عطاء عن عائشة حيث سئلت عن علي (عليه السلام) فقالت: علي خير البشر لا يشك فيه إلا كافر
And it was narrated from Atiyah, that he asked from Jabir ibn Abdullah about Ali, and he said: He is best of creation, and no one except hypocrite would be in doubt regarding that.
And from Ata from Aisha, when she was asked about Ali, she said: Ali is the best of creation, no one except disbeliever would be in doubt about that.
عن ابن عمر قال: قال: رسول الله (صلى الله عليه وآله): من فضل أحدا من أصحابي على علي فقد كفر
From ibn Umar, messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wa ali) said: Who ever would put anyone from my companions in the matters of superiority upon Ali, would disbelief.
Book: Akaidul Imamiyah
Author: Muhammad Rza Muzaffar
Page 22 he said:
vision does not perceive him, yet he perceives everything. anyone who likens him to his creatures, for example one who supposes that allah has a face, hands and eyes, or says that he comes down to the lowest heaven, or that he will appear to the people of paradise like a moon, and so forth, he is as one who does not believe in Allah
Page 23, he said:
similarly, one who believes that he will be seen by his creatures on the day of judgement is an unbeliever. even though he does not liken Allah to anyone in appearance.
Muslims do believe that Allah Taala would be seen by his creaturely in paradise, and that He would be seen without a problem, like we can see the Moon, and they do believe that He descends to the lowest heaven.
This shia shaykh made clear takfir to people which do hold such beliefs!
al-Bahrani in his book “al-Hadaiq an-Nadira” (5/176):
Said shaykh (at-Toose) in at-Tahzib: ….meaning in it that opponent to people of truth is kaafir, and it is necessary that his ruling would be ruling of kaafir, except the one who would leave (this group) by proof.
and said ibn Idris in “as-Sarair”: …… an opponent of people of truth is kaafir without contradiction between us.
Muhammad Salin al-Mazandarani in “Sharhul Usool al-Kafi”: And who would deny it – he means wilayah – he is kaafir, because he denied greatest thing what prophet bring, and base from bases.
Here you can see 3 known shia shaykh making clear cut takfir of each and everyone who is in opposition to them. Sunni, Zaydi – Soofe, Salafi. That doesn’t matter for them.
Indeed fitna of khawarij took its root from rafd.
And you can see in the words of Mazandarani. That greatest thing that prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) brought for them is not tawhid BUT WILAYAH!
It is not a secret for anyone that modern Imami shias do believe in 12 Imams.
We would like to present to you quote from shia scholar Faydh al-Kashani regarding those who abandon this belief of shias – all Islamic nation apart from themselves.
Just another Q/A for all people who were deluded by shia calls to brotherhood.
هل المعتقدين بإمامة أبي بكر وعمر بن الخطاب يدخلون الجنة؟
جاء في الخبر الصحيح ما مضمونه: «أنه سئل الامام الصادق سلام الله عليه عن أقلّ ما يُخرج الإنسان عن الدين؟ فقال سلام الله عليه: هو أن يعتقد بشيء لم يكن من عند الله بأنّه من عند الله» فإمامة عليّ بن أبي طالب وأولاده المعصومين بتصريح من النبي الكريم كانت من عند الله،فمناعتقد بإمامتهم كان على دين الله ودخل الجنة إن شاء الله تعالى.
Q – Would people who believe in the Imamate of Abu Bakr and Umar enter heaven?
A – It came in authentic report this meaning: “Imam Jafar, peace be upon him, was asked about less thing which could put person from Islam. And answer, peace be upon him, that it is belief that something which is not from Allah is from Allah”. And Imamate of Ali ibn Abu Talib and his progeny, by clear statement from Nabi al-Karim is from Allah. And who would believe in their Imamate is upon the religion of Allah, and by Allah wish, would enter heaven.
Book: Biharul Anwar.
Author: Muhammad al-Majlisi.
Know that usage of terms like Shirk and Kufr about those who doesn’t believe in the Imamah of commander of faithful and Aimma from his children, and put in the matters of superiority others upon them – is an evidence that they are disbelievers which would stay in fire
Al-Mufid *** in his book al-Masail said: Imamiyah agreed that whoever would deny one Imam from Imams, and reject what Allah obliged to obey to him – HE IS KAAFIR, MISGUIDED, WHICH DESERVE TO STAY IN FIRE.
Book: Awail al-Maqalat. Translation to Farsi by Sajjad Waazi, point 16.
Author: Sheikh al-Mufid.
16 – Speech about Innovators and the titles and the rules they deserve.
Imamia agree that all innovators are Kafir. It is necessary for the Imam, when in power, to make them do repentance, after inviting(dawah) them(to reject biddah) and reasoning with them and providing them evidence. If they repent and return to the straight path, they will be freed, otherwise, on the ground of turning back from the faith, they will be killed. And if anyone of them dies in a state of innovation is from the people of hell.
The Mutazilite did Ijmah opposite that (above rule). They thought that most of the innovators are Fasiq not Kafir. Among the Islamic sects, there are groups who neither consider the innovator a Fasiq nor out of the fold of Islam like the friends of Ibn Shabib from Murjia, and Batriya sect from Zaydia, who share the same Usool (doctrine) with Ibn Shabib. Though, they disagree with him on the attributes of Imam.
Indeed this is another, very heavy proof that rafidah is almost the same as khawarij. They are blood brothers in usool, such like takfir of all other sects which disagree with them in any matters of religion.
THE GIANT of shia mazhab said that they are in agreement that innovators (and that mean all other sects apart from them) are kuffar!
Also in this quote we can see what should except all other sects apart from Imamiyah if they would live in country which is ruling by rafidah! First rafidi ruler would call them to repent, and if they would disagree, they would be killed. And this has happen before. History seen such attitude from rafidah when they were in charge, they have killed many Muslims in Azerbaijan,during the time of rafidi shah Ismail Safawi. Entire villages were massacred only because residents refused to include testimony that Ali is wali of Allah in Shahadah of Islam. May Allah Taala protect Muslims from falling under the ruler ship of rafidah, and helps those who already lives under it to survive, and protect their faith.
Also in this quote you can see clear evidence that almost each and every modern rafidi scholar is ugly hypocrite! Because we can see them calling for so called Islamic brotherhood between shias and sunnis, by calling us: Our brothers sunnis. And in reality they know that we are kuffar in their view and we should be killed only because we follow to fiqh of 4 schools.
PS. Jazak Allah khayran our brother Abu Muslim Khorasani for translation.
Below you would see quotes with 3 different chains from shia imams, that all companions except 3 or 4 from them, apostated after death of prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam).
In his book “Hadaiq an-Nadira” (10/43):
قد استفاضت الروايات والاخبار عن الائمة الابرار (عليهم السلام) – كما بسطنا عليه الكلام في كتاب الشهاب الثاقب في بيان معنى الناصب – بكفر المخالفين ونصبهم وشركهم وان الكلب واليهودى خير منهم
“Widespread (or plenty) narrations and stories from righteous imams (alaihuma salam) – as I elaborated in the book “Shihab as-Saqib fi bayan mana an-Nasib” – (testify) disbelief of opponents, their nasibizm, and their polytheism. And Dog and Jews are better than them”.
In his book “Sharhul ziyaratul jamiatul kabira” at page 136 he named Hasan al-Basri – the mukhalif (opponent).
And later he expressed his opinion on these opponents by saying:
وقد دلت اخبار كثيرة على كفر المخالفين يحتاج جمعها الى كتاب مفرد
And many narrations proofs disbelief of opponents, it makes necessary to gather them in book dedicated especially to this.
Source: Aytollat Shubbar, “Sharhul ziyaratul jamiatul kabira” p 150.
So Muslims! Don’t be deluded by rafida callers, which calls you for brotherhood! We are nothing but disbelievers in the view of their top scholars!