Yes, the title is kind of provoking (but nothing compared to what you are going to read from Shia books!) and many of you (Sunnah or Shia) – especially the common folks among the Shias – might have never heard about a single of the following narrations (that have all been classified as reliable narrations in regards to the Shia Mahdi by major classical Shia scholars whose views have more weight than any Marja’) that we have collected in this unique article. We’ve gathered the best of the best we could find on numerous Arabic websites that have (aready) finished off Shiism – especially regarding our very topic – ages ago. Even the Arab speaking Shias on various forums couldn’t come up with any good explanation except (as it is always the case) with very lame excuses and strange and far-fetched explanation for the sadistic, Zoroastrian, Jewish and mass-murdering attributes of their hidden 12th saviour.
We are talking about a thorough exposure where not a single doubt will be left that the 12th Imam of the Rafidha could be ANYONE but the real Muslim Mahdi.
العديد من المؤمنين يتساءلون عن الطريقة التي سيموت بها الإمام المهدي ، وإذا كان (عليه السلام) سيستشهد فهذا يعني أنّ الغاية من كلّ مسيرة الأئمّة (عليهم السلام)ومن غَيبة الإمام الطويلة ـ وهي تحقيق الكمال للبشريّة وتوجّههم للدين ـ لن تتحقّق ، فما هو قولكم في ذلك؟
الجواب :باسمه جلت اسمائهنقلَ صاحب كتاب إلزام الناصب: أنّه إذا تمّت السبعون سنة، أتى الحجّةَ الموت، فتقتله امرأة من بني تميم اسمها سعيدة، ولها لحية كلحية الرجال، بجاون صخر من فوق سطح، وهو متجاوز في الطريق. وفوزه بالشهادة لا يتنافى مع بلوغ البشريّة قمّة الكمال، فإنّ الكمال للمجموع، وليس لكلِّ فرد فرد.
Compilied and translated by brother TripolySunni, prepared by Faylaq Omar.
People who spend some of their time in browsing our blog, already seen how many shia scholars did believe in tahrif of Quran. I decided to make a fihrist of their names.
By TripolySunni, edited, abridged and arranged by gift2shias team.
Fiqh of Taqqiyah:
Allah said in the Quran: [Yusufali 68:42] The Day that the shin shall be laid bare, and they shall be summoned to bow in adoration, but they shall not be able,-
Sheikh Saduq in his Tawhid, chapter 14 gave explanation of this verse from masoom Imam.
1 – حدثنا علي بن أحمد بن محمد بن عمران الدقاق رحمه الله قال: حدثنا محمد بن أبي عبدالله الكوفي، قال: حدثنا محمد بن إسماعيل البرمكي، قال: حدثنا الحسين بن الحسن، عن بكر، عن الحسين بن سعد، عن أبي الحسن عليه السلام في قوله عز وجل: (يوم يكشف عن ساق) قال: حجاب من نور يكشف، !!!!!فيقع المؤمنون سجدا، وتدمج أصلاب المنافقين فلا يستطيعون السجود
(Chain) from al-Hussain ibn Sad from Abul Hasan (alaihi salam) regarding verse “the shin shall be laid bare”, Imam said: The veil from the light will be removed, and believers will made a prostration. And spines of the hypocrites will grow together, and they will not be able to make a prostration.
2 – أبي رحمه الله، قال: حدثنا سعد بن عبدالله، عن إبراهيم بن هاشم، عن ابن فضال، عن أبي جميلة، عن محمد بن علي الحلبي، عن أبي عبدالله عليه السلام في قوله عزوجل: (يوم يكشف عن ساق) قال: تبارك الجبار، ثم أشار إلى ساقه فكشف عنها الازار، قال: ويدعون إلى السجود فلا يستطيعون، قال: افحم القوم
(Chain) from Abu Abdullah (alaihi salam) regarding words of Allah “the shin shall be laid bare”, imam (praised Allah by saying) Tabarrakal Jabbar! AND THEN HE POINTED TOWARDS HIS (OWN) SHIN AND REMOVED THE MANTLE FROM IT. Then he said: They will be called to the prostration and they will not be able to make it (till the end of hadith).
3 – حدثنا محمد بن الحسن بن أحمد بن الوليد رحمه الله قال: حدثنا محمد بن الحسن الصفار، عن أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى، عن أحمد بن محمد بن أبي نصر، عن الحسين بن موسى، عن عبيد بن زرارة، عن أبي عبدالله عليه السلام قال: سألته عن قول الله عز و جل: (يوم يكشف عن ساق) قال: كشف إزاره عن ساقه، ويده الاخرى على رأسه فقال: سبحان ربي الاعلى.
(Chain) from imam Abu Abdullah (alaihi salam) while explaining the words of Allah “the shin shall be laid bare” imam: REMOVED THE MANTLE FROM HIS SHIN, and put his other hand on his Head. Then he praised Allah by saying: Subhana Rabiyal Ala!
I am leaving aside comments from Saduq on these reports. This nation famous for corrupting apparent meanings.
Shias in the world, and unfortunately some small amount of sunnis are confident that Yazid was the only one person who was responsible for murdering of Husayn (r.a).
But this is not true.
Let us see who was accused by Husayn (r.a) himself in regards to this crime.
In “Muntahal Amal” by sheikh of shias Abbas Qummi (1/535), we can see Husayn saying to people who inviting him to Kufa:
اللهم أحكم بيننا وبين قوم دعونا لينصرونا فقتلونا
Translation: O Allah! Judge between us and people, that called us (here) to help us and then killed (fought) us.
Check any known historic shia or sunni books. That was shias of Kufa that called Husayn (r.a) to their city, and then due to fear, hypocrisy, money they betrayed him and killed him.
Just in brief some religious ruling from shia beloved scholar.
Let us first start with marriage with breast feeding babies. This was already confirmed by Khomayni before.
At his official site, Sistani said:
2501. If a man contracts Nikah with a suckling girl, and the wife of that man suckles her, then it is considered that the wife becomes the mother-in-law of her husband, and therefore, becomes haraam for him. Although this consideration is not free from Ishkal, yet precaution should not be ignored.
2502. If a person wants that his sister-in-law (his brother’s wife) may become his Mahram, he may contract a temporary Nikah with a suckling girl, for example, for two days, and during those two days, the wife of his brother may suckle that girl as mentioned in rule no. 2483. By so doing, she will become his mother-in-law, and thus be Mahram. But if the woman suckles the girl from his brother’s milk, it is a matter of Ishkal.
And some coins of Sistanis brilliant fiqhi ideas to add.
Breast feeding of child by DEAD WOMAN!
2483. The following are the eight conditions under which suckling child becomes the cause of being Mahram.
That the child sucks the milk of a woman who is alive. It is of no consequence if milk is drawn from the breast of a woman who is dead. That the milk of the woman should not be the product of fornication or adultery. Hence, if the milk for an illegitimate child is breastfed to another child, the latter will not become Mahram of anyone. That the child sucks milk directly from the breasts of the woman. Hence, if milk is poured into its mouth, it has no consequence. That the milk be pure and unadulterated. That the milk be of one husband only. Hence, if a breast-feeding woman is divorced and then she marries another man by whom she becomes pregnant, if the milk of the first pregnancy still continues from the breast till she gives birth to the other child, and she feeds any child eight times with the milk from her first pregnancy before giving birth, and feeds the same child seven times with the milk from the second pregnancy, after giving birth, that child will not become Mahram of anyone. That the child does not throw up the milk due to illness. If it vomits the milk, the suckling has no effect. The suckling should be of such quantity that it could be said that the bones of the child were strengthened and the flesh allowed to grow. And if that cannot be ascertained, then if a child suckles for one full day and night, or if it suckles fifteen times to its fill, as will be explained later, it will be sufficient. But if it is known that in spite of the child having suckled for one full day and night, or for fifteen times, the milk has not had any effect on the bones and the growth of flesh of the child, then one should not ignore exercising the precaution. That the child should not have completed two years of his age, and, if it is suckled after it has completed two years of its age, it does not become Mahram of anyone. In fact, if, for example, it sucks milk eight times before completing its two years, and seven times after completing its two years, it does not become Mahram of anyone. But, if milk continues from the breast for more than two years since a woman gave birth to her child, and she suckles the child continuously, that child will become Mahram of those who have been mentioned above.
Sayidina Uthman (r.a) prayed 4 rakahs instead of 2 during the Haj. This was enough reason for some hypocrites to accuse him.
But everything has own explanation.
al-Bayhaqi narrated in “al-Marifah” as a taliq, and declared its chain of transmission good: From Abdurrahman ibn Humayd from his father that Uthman ibn Affan completed prayer at Mina and then delivered the speech to people. He said: “People! The Sunnah is the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allah (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam)! And the Sunnah of his two companions. However, this year are many new people and I was afraid that they will take it as a sunnah”.
Note: Mean he has prayed 4 rakahs during the journey instead of 2, because he afraid that in case he will pray two, new comers will continue in this way even not during the journeys.
at-Tahawi and Abu Dawud narrated from az-Zuhri, and chain is strong mursal in accordance to allama Nimawi, that he said: “Uthman only prayed four at Mina because the desert Arabs were more numerous that year and he preferred to teach them that the prayer is four rakahs”.
Both reports taken from Athar as-Sunnah by allama Nimawi Hanafi pp 371-372.
Salam alaikum. Once we already posted information where shia scholar Shareef al-Murtada stated that majority of Ali’s followers befriended Abu bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with all of them) and accepted their Imamate.
Now I’d like to show you another quote from other known shia scholar at-Tabarsi.
In his book “Khatimatul Mustadrak” (5/18) he said:
ومن هنا يعلم: ان الذين قتلوا مع امير المؤمنين (عليه السلام) في الحروب الثلاثة كانوا شهداء وفيهم كثير ممن كانوا يتولونهما
“and from this it is known: that those who fought along with commander of faithful (alaihi salam) in 3 battles (Jamal;Nahravan; Siffin) and became a martyrs, and between them were a lot of (people) who befriended them”.
And in the footnote written:
أي ممن كانوا يتولون الخلفيتن: الاول، والثاني
Mean those who befriended two caliphs: First and Second.
How to answer those who say: How could you say that all the Companions are trustworthy and accept all their narrations despite the fact that they commit grievous and minor sins which is something threatens their integrity. The proper thing is not to call them upright or trustworthy until their integrity is confirmed and those whom seem to be corrupt, their integrity shall be questioned?
• • • • •
Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah. Now coming to the point: Continue reading
Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family, his Companions, and those who followed them.
The issue of insulting the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) is one of the issues that need lengthy explanation because the one who insults them may do so because of a worldly rivalry between them, and that is obvious in their lifetime. A person may insult a number of the Companions because he believes that they have apostatized or have done major sins in his view. He may also insult them because they have provided victory to this religion which he claims to be attributed to, but in fact he is not a Muslim. Continue reading
Bismillah wa salatu wa salamu ala rasulullah. Salam alaikum, shaykh and muhadith of shias al-Kulayni narrated in his book “al-Kafi”, chapter Birth of Abul Hasan Musa ibn Jafar: Continue reading
Bismillah wa salatu wa salamu ala rasulullah.
Salam alaikum wa Rahmatullah.
Shaykh and muhadith of Rawafid – al-Kulayni narrated in his al-Kafi 1/279:
From Muhammad ibn Sinan who has said the following: “Once I was in the presence of abu Ja‘far the 2nd (alaihi salam), and I mentioned the differences among the Shi‘a. “The Imam said, ‘O Muhammad, Allah, the Most Holy, the Most High, is One and eternal. He created Muhammad, Ali and Fatimah, recipients of divine supreme covenant. They were there for a thousand Dahr . Then He created all other things. He made them witness the creation of all other things. He made obedience to them obligatory and gave them control of the affairs of the creation. They can, thus, make lawful whatever they wish and unlawful whatever they wish and they never wish anything unless Allah, the Most Holy, the Most High, wishes.’ He then said, ‘O Muhammad, this is a religion that, if exaggerated, will lead to disproportionate belief and ignoring it will cause degradation. Those holding to it properly will have proper contact. Keep it with you, O Muhammad.’”
So basically this is a fundamental for shias, which do believe in the Wilayah at-Takwiniyah. This reports clearly states that Imams are in the control of the universe. I am asking shias, if rain is a matter from the matters of the universe? Yes, will be an answer. So, you have to ask for the rain, the one who controls it?
Also this narration clearly says that Imams are permitted to play with shariah as they wish. They can make things lawful and unlawful. Reservation that they don’t wish until Allah doesn’t wish play no role. Because nothing in world can’t happen, unless Allah wish it. I am not going to get deeper in the matter of qadar.
Tayib, ya ayuha shia! You say Imams can make things lawful and unlawful. I say, is shariah – religion, perfected in the times of prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam)?! If answer is no, then you are disbelievers which rejecting Quran. Because in Quran surah al-Maida, Allah clearly said that religion was perfected – completed. Khalas! No one on earth can change lawful or unlawful if religion is perfected and complete!
Bismillah wa salatu ala rasullulah. Salam alaikum, Rafidi shaykh al-Muhadeth al-Kulayni narrated in his al-Kafi 1/83: Continue reading
Bismillah wa salatu wa salamu ala rasullulah.
Shaykh Muhadith of shias Nematullah Jazairi (may Allah burn him in the hell) said in his book “Nor al-Bahrayn” (1/57-58):
and Muhaqiq al-Hilli narrated in elevated form in last of “as-Sarair” till Muhammad ibn Eesa, which said: I wrote to him (obviously Imam) and asked him about nawaseeb, is there any need to examine any of them, after their testimony that they put Jibt (in accordance to them Abu Bakr) and Taghut (in accordance to them Umar) in the matters of superiority (upon Ali) and believe in their (two shaykhs) Imamate? And answer came: Who is upon this he is naseebe!
and author – may his secret be purified – narrated in the book “al-Ilaal” – naseebe is the one who dislikes the mazhab of the Imamiya. (Jazairi says) – AND THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT MAJORITY OR (BETTER TO SAY) ALL (OF AHLESUNNAH) UPON FAITH OF NAWASEEB IN THESE TWO MEANINGS. AND NUMEROUS (TAWATUR) REPORTS AND AGREED OPINION (OF SHIAS) THAT NAWASEEB ARE DISBELIEVERS IN THIS WORLD AND HEREAFTER.
1) All ahlesunnah agreed that shaykhan were best people in this nation, better than Ali. Due to this faith only, we are disbelievers in the eyes of shias.
2) All people from Ahlesunnah dislikes kufr of rawafid, their faith in TAHRIF of Quran, their shirk, their beloved Mutah marriage and etc. And this alone enough for shias to say that we are disbelievers!