Shia source: He forgot Quran.

as Salam alaykum.

Did prophet forget anything? As a Ahlesunnah, we do believe he didn’t forget anything from revelation, or any shariah related issues.

As for shias?

مختصر البصائر – الحسن بن سليمان الحلى – ص 284 – 285
 وعنه ومحمد بن الحسين بن أبي الخطاب وغيرهما عن أحمد بن محمد بن أبي نصر ، عن هشام بن سالم ، عن سعد بن طريف الخفاف ، قال : قلت لأبي جعفر ( عليه السلام ) : ما تقول فيمن أخذ عنكم علما فنسيه ؟ قال : ” لا حجة عليه ، إنما الحجة على من سمع منا حديثا فأنكره ، أو بلغه فلم يؤمن به وكفر ، فأما النسيان فهو موضوع عنكم . إن أول سورة نزلت على رسول الله ( صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم ) * ( سبح اسم ربك الأعلى ) * فنسيها ، فلم يلزمه حجة في نسيانه ، ولكن الله تبارك وتعالى أمضى له ذلك ، ثم قال  سنقرئك فلا تنسى “.

Translation:

“Mukhtasar al-Basair” by al-Hasan ibn Sulayman al-Hilli, pages 284-285.

“And from him, and from Muhammad ibn al-Husayn ibn Abul Khattab and others, from Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Abu Nasr, from Hisham ibn Salim, from Sayyed ibn Tareef al-Khaffaf, which said: I asked from Abu Jafar (alaihi salam): “What do you say about person who took knowledge from you and forgot?” He said: “No argument against him for this, argument against man who heard hadith from us, and rejected it. Or it (hadith) was narrated to him and he didn’t believe it, and disbelieved (by this). As for forgetfulness, it is (known) thing from them. First chapter (surah) revealed upon prophet (sallalahu alayhi wa alihi) was – “Glorify the name of thy Guardian-Lord Most High” (87/1), and HE FORGOT IT, (but) there was no need for him an argument in forgetting it, but Allah blessed and exalted arrange this for him, then said (by saying?): “We will make you recite so you shall not forget” (87/6).

 

 

Best narrator of the Rafidah is an accursed Closet-Christian heretic – ZURARAH

Even the alleged top students of their Imams and narrators were nothing but a bunch of Closet-Zoroastrian and Closet-Christian Zindeeqs (heretics). Take for instance the following Zindeeq named:

Zurārah b. A’yan b. Sunsun al-Shaybānī (a client, Mawla, of the Shaybani tribe, not an actual ‘Arab) al-Kūfī (Arabic: زرارة بن أعین بن سُنسُن الشیباني الکوفي) (b. c 70/690 – d. 150/767)

Continue reading

The Ahl al-Bayt would rejoice seeing the leveled graves of al-Baqi’

Featured

wahhhabi

بسم الله و الحمد لله الذي رفع راية التوحيد إلى يوم الدين, و الصلاة و السلام على إمام الموحدين و قائد المتوكلين, نبينا و سيدنا محمد و على آله الطيبين و صحبه الغر الميامين, و بعد:

Here’s a compilation (of Shia and Sunni) SAHIH (authentic) narrations about the prohibition of erecting structures over graves, venerating graves, kissing them etc. Many Shias are not even aware that these reports exists in their books, this might be due to the allergy their scholars have when it comes to Tawhid. Shia scholars usually do not mention the narrations we are going to present you, and if they do (only due to pressure of the Internet that has exposed their religion), they (as usual) come up with abstract and far-fetched interpretations to explain the monothestic narrations that are deeply buried somewhere in their Madhhab (yes, even in their Madhhab, despite all the lies they have attributed to the Ahl al-Bayt) away in order to secure their money-machines, which you will soon find out are the exravagant palace+5* looking tombs, shrines and mausoleums.

Continue reading

Imam’s travelling through many worlds

Imam’s (as) travelling through many worlds

حدثنا احمد بن محمد عن الحسين بن سعيد عن ابن ابى عمير عن ابى ايوب عن ابان بن تغلب قال كنت عندابى عبد الله عليه السلام فدخل عليه رجل من اهل اليمن فقال يا اخا اهل اليمن عندآم علماء قال نعم قالفما بلغ من علم عالمكم قال يسير في ليلة مسيرة شهرين يزجر الطير ويقفوا الاثر فقال أبو عبد الله عليه السلامعالم المدينة اعلم من عالمكم قال فما بلغ من علم عالم المدينة قال يسير في ساعة من النهار مسيرة شمس سنةحتى يقطع اثنى عشر الف مثل عالمكم هذا ما يعلمون ان الله خلق آدم ولا ابليس قال فيعرفونكم قال نعم ماافترض عليهم الا ولايتنا والبرائة من عدونا

 

From Ahmad bin Muhammad bin Isa, from Al-Husain bin Saeed, from Muhammad bin Abi Umair, from Abi Ayub Ibrahim bin Usman Al-Khazaz, from Aban bin Taghlub who said:

 
“I was in the presence of Abi Abdillah (Imam Sadiq) (as), when a man from Yemen came up to Him.
Imam (as) said to him, “O Yemeny brother, are there scholars among you?”
He said, “Yes”.
Imam (as) said, “What do your scholars achieve from their knowledge?”
He said, “He travels in one night the travel distance of two months of the flight of the bird and the effects would remain.”
Abi Abdillah (as) said, “The scholar from Medina [referring to the Imam’s (as)] is more knowledgeable then your scholars.”
He said, “What does the scholar of Medina achieve from his knowledge?”
Imam (as) said, ” He travels in one hour of the day, the travel distance of a year’s travel of the sun, to the extent that he cuts through twelve thousand worlds the like of this world of yours whose inhabitants are not aware that Allah (swt) created Adam (as) or Iblees”.
He said, “They recognise You?”
Imam (as) said, “Yes. There is no obligation upon them except for Our Wilayah and the keeping away (Tabarra) from Our enemies.”
[Source: Basaair Al-Darajaat, Vol. 8, Chapter. 12, Hadees. 15]
All narrators are trustworthy. Hadees is Saheeh (authentic)
There are more narrations with the same meaning, hence making the Matn “Tawattur” (frequently narrated)

محمد بن عبدالله الرازي الجاموراني، عن إسماعيل بن موسى، عن أبيه، عن جده عن عبدالصمد بن علي قال: دخل رجل على علي بن الحسين عليهما السلام فقال له علي بن الحسين عليهما السلام: من أنت؟ قال: أنا رجل منجم قال فانت عراف، قال: فنظر إليه ثم قال: هل أدلك على رجل قد مر منذ دخلت علينا في أربعة عشر عالما كل عالم أكبر من الدنيا ثلاث مرات لم يتحرك من مكانه؟ قال من هو؟ قال: أنا وإن شئت أنبأتك بما أكلت وما ادخرت في بيتك

Muhammad bin Abdullah Al-Razi Al-Jaamoorani, from Ismail bin Moosa from his father, from his grandfather, from Abd Al-Samad bin Ali who said :

 
A man came up to Ali bin Husain (as). Ali bin Husain (as) said to him, “Who are you?”.
The man said, “I am a astrologer.” Imam (as) said, “So you are a fortune-teller.”
Imam (as) then looked at him and then said, “Shall I show you a man who since the time you have come to us, moved through 14 worlds, with each world being 3 times bigger than this world, without having moved from his place?”
The man said, “Who is He?”
Imam (as) said, “I and if I wish, I can inform you what you ate and what you have stored in your house.”
[Source: Basaair Al-Darajaat, Vol. 8, Chapter. 12, Hadees. 13]
Comments: Just wonder how these Imams with such super power been killed?

Shaykh Saduq manipulator

Bismillah wa salatu wa salamu ala rasullah.

Shaykh of shias al-Khui said in his book “Mojam ar-Rijaal”:

بقي هنا شى‏ء: وهو أنّ الشيخ الصدوق : قدّس سرّه : قال في أماليه: حدّثنا محمد بن الحس‏ؤن الصفّار، قال: حدّثنا العبّاس بن معروف. الحديث الاوّل، من المجلس 68.
وقال في الحديث 2 من المجلس 82: حدّثنا محمد بن الحسن الصفّار، عن يعقوب بن يزيد. وقال في العلل: الجزء 1: حدّثنا محمد بن الحسن الصفّار، عن العبّاس بن معروف، باب 34، العلّة التي من أجلها دفن إسماعيل أمّه في الحجر، الحديث 1.
وظاهر هذه الجمل، أنه : قدّس سرّه : يروي عن الصفّار بلا واسطة وهو شيخه، ولكن هذا أمر غير ممكن، فإنّ الصفّار مات سنة مائتين وتسعين على ماعرفت، والشيخ الصدوق : قدّس سرّه : ولد بعد ثلاثمائة، فكيف يمكن أن يروي عنه

http://www.al-khoei.us/books/?id=7810

Translation:

and one question remains. He (Muhammad as-Saffar) was from shaykhs of shaykh Saduq. He (Saduq) said in al-Amali: Narrated to us Muhammad ibn al-Hasan as-Saffar – narrated to us al-Abbas ibn Maroof. See 1 hadith from 68 gathering.  And in 2 hadith from 82 gathering: narrated to us Muhammad ibn al-Hasan as-Saffar from Yaqub ibn Yazid. And he said in al-Ilal, first volume: narrated to us Muhammad ibn al-Hasan as-Saffar from al-Abbas ibn Maroof …………………. And obvious from  this, that he (Saduq) narrated from as-Saffar without any intermediate, and he was his shaykh. BUT THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE. Because as-Saffar died in 290 year, from what is known. And shaykh Saduq born after 300 year. And how is it possible that eh narrated from him?

 

Another example of “honesty” of Saduq.

al-Khui also said in other place of his book (9/83):

الرابعة: أن الصدوق ذكر في الامالي، المجلس 63، الحديث 1: حدثنا سعد ابن عبد الله، قال: حدثنا أحمد بن محمد بن عيسى… الحديث. وظاهر هذا الكلام رواية الصدوق عن سعد بن عبد الله بلا واسطة، وهذا أمر غير ممكن، فإن سعد ابن عبد الله مات سنة (299) أو سنة (301) فكيف يمكن أن يروي عنه الصدوق المتولد بعد ذلك

http://ar.lib.eshia.ir/14036/9/83

Translation:

4-th: as-Saduq mentioned in al-Amali, gathering 63, hadith 1: narrated to us Sad ibn Abdullah – narrated to us Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Eisa… al-hadith. And apparent from these words that he Saduq use to narrate from Sad ibn Abdullah without any intermediate. And this is not possible. Because Sad ibn Abdullah died in 299 or 301 year. And how Saduq which bore after could narrate from him?

 

They can make lawful whatever they wish and unlawful!!

Bismillah wa salatu wa salamu ala rasulullah.

Salam alaikum wa Rahmatullah.

Shaykh and muhadith of Rawafid – al-Kulayni narrated in his al-Kafi 1/279:

1_279_kafi_tahlil wa tahrim

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation:

From Muhammad ibn Sinan who has said the following: “Once I was in the presence of abu Ja‘far the 2nd (alaihi salam), and I mentioned the differences among the Shi‘a. “The Imam said, ‘O Muhammad, Allah, the Most Holy, the Most High, is One and eternal. He created Muhammad, Ali and Fatimah, recipients of divine supreme covenant. They were there for a thousand Dahr . Then He created all other things. He made them witness the creation of all other things. He made obedience to them obligatory and gave them control of the affairs of the creation. They can, thus, make lawful whatever they wish and unlawful whatever they wish and they never wish anything unless Allah, the Most Holy, the Most High, wishes.’ He then said, ‘O Muhammad, this is a religion that, if exaggerated, will lead to disproportionate belief and ignoring it will cause degradation. Those holding to it properly will have proper contact. Keep it with you, O Muhammad.’”

Discussion:

So basically this is a fundamental for shias, which do believe in the Wilayah at-Takwiniyah. This reports clearly states that Imams are in the control of the universe. I am asking shias, if rain is a matter from the matters of the universe? Yes, will be an answer. So, you have to ask for the rain, the one who controls it?

Also this narration clearly says that Imams are permitted to play with shariah as they wish. They can make things lawful and unlawful. Reservation that they don’t wish until Allah doesn’t wish play no role. Because nothing in world can’t happen, unless Allah wish it. I am not going to get deeper in the matter of qadar.

Tayib, ya ayuha shia! You say Imams can make things lawful and unlawful. I say, is shariah – religion, perfected in the times of prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam)?! If answer is no, then you are disbelievers which rejecting Quran. Because in Quran surah al-Maida, Allah clearly said that religion was perfected – completed. Khalas! No one on earth can change lawful or unlawful if religion is perfected and complete!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Their shaykh as-Saduq – khayanatul Ilmiyah

Bismillah wa salatu wa salamu ala rasullah. Salam alaikum wa Rahmatullah. Those readers who spent some of their times by browsing our blog, seen some articles about famous and known shia shaykh as-Saduq, ibn Babaweyh al-Qummi. However, we’d like to present couple of additional quotes from shias scholars and books, and some old one from other editions. Continue reading

May Allah curse the Shias for adding ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ to the Athaan

Here the hideous Bid’ah of the hideous Rafidah (that some of the classical Rafidah even rejected, read HERE>>>),

21stcenturybida

and here Saying: ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ is WAJIB in the Athaan!!!

As you can see the likes of Yasser Al-Habib have even included FATIMAH AND ABA AL-FADHL (half-brother of Al-Hussein) to the Adhan. And if anyone’s going to complain and looking for a excuse by saying that the Al-Habib dude is some sort of extremist, then know that ALL their scholars are extremists by definition, merely for adding ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ to the Adhan, there are a scholars amongst them, other than Yasser Al-Habib who also not just add Ali but also FATIMAH and ALL the 12 Imams into the Adhan:

Ayatullah Modarresi’s hukm says regarding the inclusion of Fatimah (!!!) in the third testimony of Adhan & Iqaamah

هل يجوز في الأذان قول “أشهد أنّ علياً أمير المؤمنين والصديقة الطاهرة ‏فاطمة الزهراء وأبنائهما المعصومين أولياء الله”؟

لا بأس بذلك بقصد الرجاء.‏

Translation:

Q: Is it permissible to say in the Adhan: ‘I bear witness that Ali is the chief of the believers and that the truthful and pure Fatimah Az-Zahra’ and their infallible sons are the Awliya (close friends) of Allah?’

A: There is nothing wrong with it, with the intention of Rajaa’ (doing something with the hope of the acceptance or pleasure of Allah)

[Link to original]

SCAN:

fatima in the adhan

Not good enough? What about a major Marja’ like Sistani:

535083_355021891214682_141296365920570_1079456_876460146_n

Question:

Is it permissible to add the name of our mistress Fatimah Al-Zahra’ (SWA) into the THREE testimonies of the Adhan (making it FOUR) and Iqamah (like: I bear witness that Ali, Fatimah and her infallible sons are the proofs of Allah).

Answer/Fatwa by Ayatullah Al-‘Udhma Sayyid Ali Al-Hussayni Al-Sistani:

It is permissible to add the phrase into the Adhan and Iqamah!

Now check what Al-Sadooq (Ibn Babawayh Al-Qummi), one of the biggest classical Shia scholars said about those who ‘merely’ included Ali into the Adhan:

Book: Man Laa YaHduruh Al-Faqeeh, vol. 1, pg. 290 – 291

Author: In Babawayh al-Qummi (‘Al-Sadooq’)

fn4813

هَذَا هُوَ الْأَذَانُ الصَّحِيحُ لَا يُزَادُ فِيهِ وَ لَا يُنْقَصُ مِنْهُ وَ الْمُفَوِّضَةُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ قَدْ وَضَعُوا أَخْبَاراً وَ زَادُوا فِي الْأَذَانِ مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ فِي بَعْضِ رِوَايَاتِهِمْ بَعْدَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَوَى بَدَلَ ذَلِكَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ لَا شَكَّ فِي أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ وَ أَنَّهُ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً وَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً وَ آلَهُ صَلَوَاتُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِمْ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ وَ لَكِنْ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ فِي أَصْلِ الْأَذَانِ وَ إِنَّمَا ذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِيُعْرَفَ بِهَذِهِ الزِّيَادَةِ الْمُتَّهَمُونَ بِالتَّفْوِيضِ الْمُدَلِّسُونَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ فِي جُمْلَتِنَا
‘This is the authentic (Sahih) Adhan, nothing is to be added or subtracted from it. The Mufawwidah’s (form of Ghulat/extremists), may Allah curse them, have fabricated traditions and have added to the Adhan مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ (Muhammad and the family of Muhammad are the best of mankind) twice. In some of their traditions, after saying أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah) (they add) أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that ‘Ali is the Wali of Allah) twice. Among them there are others who narrate this أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ (I bear witness that ‘Ali is the commander of the faithfull) twice. There is no doubt that ‘Ali is the Wali of Allah and that he is the true commander of the faithful and that Muhammad and his family, peace be upon them, are the best of creatures. However, that is not [part] of the original Adhan. I have mentioned this so that those who have been accused of concocting tafwid and have insulated themselves in our ranks should be known.

COMMENT: After all those centuries of lying the Rafidah are still not ashamed to throw around with terms like BID’AH! I mean, what the heck? They are DROWN into Bid’ah how can they even use the word Bid’ah? They should avoid it just as they’ve nearly avoided the term TAWHID and SUNNAH (hence you see everything aroung them is Ail/Wilayah/Ali/Wilayah/Hussein/Mahdi/Fatimah/Wilayah/Wilayah etc.). They accuse the Sahabah of Bid’ah (like Omar adding to the Fajr Adhan, which is nothing but a LIE: REFUTATION 1>>>and 2>>>), yet they have not a SINGLE Sahih narration where the Prophet صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم ordered or agreed with their Bid’ah of “Aliyun Waliullah” in the Adhan. They (like Yasser Al-Habib above) even added the name FATIMAH (RA) into the Adhan!

CONCLUSION:

This sect is constantly changing, at first they never said it, then there appeared some Ghulat as Sadooq says who started saying it and he accused them of being cursed heretics, a couple of years later the practice becomes wide spread among them so their scholars start allowing it, a couple of years later many opinions arise all of them claiming that it is “Mustahabb” or recommended to say it during Adhan, and finally in  our days we’re starting to see new opinions saying that this is WAJIB and that Fatimah should be included etc…. And the journey of the deviants continue. In fact this Bid’ah (just like the black and white turban clergy caste system amongt the Shias) is an Safavid innovation. The modern Rafidah scholars aren’t the first major scholars to allow it, before them Al-Majlisi the first and al-Majlisi the second (ie. Mohammad Taqi AlMajlisi and Mohammad Baqir Majlisi ) allowed it, when it was basically becoming the ‘norm’ under the Safavids. So it was the palace scholar of the Safavids, the heretic Al-Majlisi (who introduced so many Majoosi elements into the already full of superstition and heresies rotten Shia sect) who  backed up his father and said that doing this 3rd testimony in the Adhan / Iqaamah is a great act. The Shias who in their propaganda always claim that the Sunni schools are actually results of the Umayyad dynasties have actually introduced a heretical innovation into the Adhan that was started by the blood thirsty Safavids with the HELP of Shia scholars! It was Shah Isma`il, leader of Safawid dynasty who said to first add the 3rd testimony in Adhaan. And as stated before, the first major scholar to add it was al-Majlisi I (Muhammad Taqi al-Majlisi) in his RawDah al-Muttaqeen, vol. 2, pg. 245-246 also in his Persian commentary of Man Laa Yahduruh al-Faqeeh called Lawaam` Saahibaqaraani, vol. 3, pg. 565-567. According to his statements in these books, the wilayah in the Adhaan was already prominent (because of Shah Isma`il’s decree). al-Majlisi’s I teacher stopped reciting the 3rd testimony in adhan, because of that he was being accused of being Sunni, so al-Majlisi I convinced him to do so. Then, his son al-Majlisi II (Muhammad Baaqir al-Majlisi) followed his dad’s footsteps and tried to provide “proofs” for it in his magnum opus called Bihaar al-Anwaar.

The first one to say it is mustahab was al-Majlisi II, in his Bihaar al-Anwaar, vol. 81, pg. 111:

و أقول لا يبعد كون الشهادة بالولاية من الأجزاء المستحبة للأذان لشهادة الشيخ و العلامة و الشهيد و غيرهم
And I say: ‘it is not improbable that the shahaadah of wilaayah is from the mustahab parts of the adhaan based off the testimony of al-Shaykh (al-Toosi), al-`Allaamah (al-Hilli), al-Shaheed (al-Thaani), and others’

But in fact there are 0 (zero) SaHeeH hadeeth from Shee’ah books that says that it is permissible to add the 3rd testimony in Adhaan or Iqaamah. Or ANY hadeeth that says that it is mustahab (recommended), or anything that says “do it with the intention of it NOT being part of the adhaan/iqaamah”. None. Zero. Nada.

________________

Related posts from Gift2Shias:

Did Omar altered the Athaan? (“Prayer is better than sleep”)

Hayyaa ‘alaa Khayr Al-‘Amal – An abondened Sunnah, removed by Omar?

‘Praying is better than sleep’ (al-salaatu khayrun min al-nawm) – SAHIH narrations in Sunni books

Ibn Saba’ The Jew, The Spiritual Father Of the Rafidha – An Unquestionable Truth

englishmajoosENGLISHThis is a lengthy article divided into three parts.

1. New phenomena: Outright rejection of the very existence of Ibn Saba’ by a contemporary Shia scholars and propagandists

2. Ibn Saba’ the Jew in Shia books – an unknown reality to many Shias

3. Shia Objection: Ibn Saba’ did existed, but Tashayyu’ (Shiism) and the Imamite sect are innocent of him

All Sunni and Shia authorities were agreed upon (the existence and reality of Abdullah bin Saba’ (although the Shia sect of course tries to deny that the foundation of Rafhd/rejectionis was taken by a Jew) until the Orientalists such as Bernard Lewis, Julius Wellhausen, Friedlander, and Caetani Leone started to cast doubt about the existence of Abdullah bin Saba’, and they were followed in that by ignorants such as Taha Hussain, Muhammad Kaamil Hussain, Adnan Ibrahim and other pro-Shia Sunnis. Needless to say that the Rafidha scholars jumped on the wagon and (in contrary to their forefathers) suddenly claimed that Ibn Saba’ is actually a myth created by the evil Umayyads to tarnish the reputation of the Shias (a claim by the likes of Murtadha Al-‘Askari, Muhammad Aal Kashif Al-Ghita etc.). Prior to 1300H (1900CE) there was no dispute about this matter at all. The contemporary Shia found in the writings of those Orientalists what was the delight of the eye and thus they began authoring in order to cast doubt about the existence of Abdullah bin Saba’, as this would allow them to dismiss a large part of the criticism against them and their sect.

As stated before, contemporary Rawafidh (in opposition to their classical scholars) …

Continue reading

The grave of ‘Ali

taken from:

Hereafter mention is made of the discovery of the grave of Sayyiduna ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib radiyallahu ‘anhu at Najaf 150 years after his death. Shirazi explains the initial secrecy surrounding the location of the graves in light of fear that the Umayyads would desecrate the grave. However, what he doesnot explain is why the location of the grave was revealed by Imam Musa al-Kazim to the Khalifah Harun ar-Rashid when the Abbasids, according to the Shi‘ah, were no less cruel to the ‘Alawis than were the Umayyads.

Hasan al-Amin writes in his Shorter Shi’ite Encyclopaedia: “Then came Abbasid rule. They were more severe upon the Alawides in their persecution and cruelty as well as upon the Shi’ites as compared to the Omayyides. Their rule was more troublesome and bitter for them, as a poet has said: ‘By God, the Omayyids did not do one-tenth in their case, as Banu Abbas did.’ Amir Abul Faras al-Hamadani says: ‘Banu Harab (Omayyids) did not succeed in these crimes even though though they intended to, as compared to your success.’ (p. 36)”

Continue reading

Book of Fatima

Shaykh Saduq narrated in his “Ilal ush Sharae” (p 205):

COVER PAGE

Translation:

From Fudayl ibn Sakarat: I entered to Abu Abdullah (alaihi salam), and Imam asked: O Fudayl? Do you know where I was looking before? I said: No. He said: I was looking to the book of Fatima (alaihi salam), and there is no Sultan which would rule, except he mentioned (there) by his name and name of his father. And there is nothing there for children of Hasan.

Comment:

Just imagine what kind of book that should be to contain names of all rulers which would rule in this world!