Sayyidunā ʻAlī’s favorite Ayah of the Qurʼān

No, it wasn’t a single of this misused verses, ambigious evidences the Rafidah use for his alleged Wilayah.

Ali bin Abi Talib {May Allah be well pleased with him} said:

“There is no Ayat/Verse in the Quran more beloved to me than this Verse:

“Truly, Allah does not forgive associating others with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whomever He wills. {Quran, 4:116).”

عَلِيِّ بْنِ أَبِي طَالِبٍ، قَالَ مَا فِي الْقُرْآنِ آيَةٌ أَحَبُّ إِلَىَّ مِنْ هَذِهِ الآيَةِ : إِنَّ اللَّهَ لاَ يَغْفِرُ أَنْ يُشْرَكَ بِهِ وَيَغْفِرُ مَا دُونَ ذَلِكَ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ )

{Sunan at-Tirmidhi ~ The Chapter on Tafsir of the Quran}

He – like the Ahlus-Sunnah – was first and foremost concerned with Tawhid and the dangerous of shirk, topics you barely hear the Rafidah speaking of (for obvious reasons).

“One cannot be a Sunni unless hating Ali …” – Blatant lie attributed to Imam Ahmad!

By Ebn Hussein | Gift2Shias

Many Sunnis who are ignorant of Shiism and its vile and hateful nature are often completely perplexed when they hear the first time how many Shiites (more so before the age of social media and Internet) actually believe that Sunnis hate or dislike Ali/Ahlul Bayt, or at least Sunni scholars. This is an ancient lied with which every single (religious) Shiite is brainwashed with from young age by their clergy in order to keep them away from Muslims/Sunnis and from the true, balanced and middle path, the path of the victorious sect, the Ahlus-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah, the lover of the Ahlul Bayt and Sahabah.

Continue reading

Abul Hasan ar-Ridha didn’t make taweel

Shaykh Saduq in his “Tawheed” p 163, narrated following hadith:

2 – حدثنا محمد بن الحسن بن أحمد بن الوليد رحمه الله، قال: حدثنا محمد ابن الحسن الصفار، عن محمد بن عيسى، عن المشرقي، عن عبدالله بن قيس(2) عن أبي الحسن الرضا عليه السلام قال: سمعته يقول: (بل يداه مبسوطتان) فقلت: له يدان هكذا، وأشرت بيدي إلى يده، فقال: لا، لو كان هكذا لكان مخلوقا.

Translation:

From Abdullah ibn Qays, I heard Abul Hasan ar-Ridha reciting (the verse) “Nay, both His hands are spread out” (al-Maida 64). I said to him: “He had hands line these?” and pointed by my hands to his. He said: “No, if they would be like these (hands), He would be (considered) creation”.

What is important here?

Imam didn’t say, He has no hands, that is power, energy and etc. He said if Allah would have hands like ours, He would be considered creation.

Are all the Companions trustworthy?

By Dr. Sa`d ibn `Abdullah Al Humayyid:

Question:

How to answer those who say: How could you say that all the Companions are trustworthy and accept all their narrations despite the fact that they commit grievous and minor sins which is something threatens their integrity. The proper thing is not to call them upright or trustworthy until their integrity is confirmed and those whom seem to be corrupt, their integrity shall be questioned?

•   •   •   •   •

Answer:

Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah. Now coming to the point: Continue reading

The ruling on insulting the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him)

By Dr. Sa`d ibn `Abdullah Al Humayyid:

Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family, his Companions, and those who followed them.

The issue of insulting the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) is one of the issues that need lengthy explanation because the one who insults them may do so because of a worldly rivalry between them, and that is obvious in their lifetime. A person may insult a number of the Companions because he believes that they have apostatized or have done major sins in his view. He may also insult them because they have provided victory to this religion which he claims to be attributed to, but in fact he is not a Muslim. Continue reading