Category Archives: Aqidah & Fiqh (Sunnah) explained

Sayyidunā ʻAlī’s favorite Ayah of the Qurʼān

Posted on by

No, it wasn’t a single of this misused verses, ambigious evidences the Rafidah use for his alleged Wilayah.

Ali bin Abi Talib {May Allah be well pleased with him} said:

“There is no Ayat/Verse in the Quran more beloved to me than this Verse:

“Truly, Allah does not forgive associating others with Him, but He forgives what is less than that for whomever He wills. {Quran, 4:116).”

عَلِيِّ بْنِ أَبِي طَالِبٍ، قَالَ مَا فِي الْقُرْآنِ آيَةٌ أَحَبُّ إِلَىَّ مِنْ هَذِهِ الآيَةِ : إِنَّ اللَّهَ لاَ يَغْفِرُ أَنْ يُشْرَكَ بِهِ وَيَغْفِرُ مَا دُونَ ذَلِكَ لِمَنْ يَشَاءُ )

{Sunan at-Tirmidhi ~ The Chapter on Tafsir of the Quran}

He – like the Ahlus-Sunnah – was first and foremost concerned with Tawhid and the dangerous of shirk, topics you barely hear the Rafidah speaking of (for obvious reasons).

“One cannot be a Sunni unless hating Ali …” – Blatant lie attributed to Imam Ahmad!

Posted on by

By Ebn Hussein | Gift2Shias

Many Sunnis who are ignorant of Shiism and its vile and hateful nature are often completely perplexed when they hear the first time how many Shiites (more so before the age of social media and Internet) actually believe that Sunnis hate or dislike Ali/Ahlul Bayt, or at least Sunni scholars. This is an ancient lied with which every single (religious) Shiite is brainwashed with from young age by their clergy in order to keep them away from Muslims/Sunnis and from the true, balanced and middle path, the path of the victorious sect, the Ahlus-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah, the lover of the Ahlul Bayt and Sahabah.

Continue reading →

Abul Hasan ar-Ridha didn’t make taweel

Posted on by

Shaykh Saduq in his “Tawheed” p 163, narrated following hadith:

2 – حدثنا محمد بن الحسن بن أحمد بن الوليد رحمه الله، قال: حدثنا محمد ابن الحسن الصفار، عن محمد بن عيسى، عن المشرقي، عن عبدالله بن قيس(2) عن أبي الحسن الرضا عليه السلام قال: سمعته يقول: (بل يداه مبسوطتان) فقلت: له يدان هكذا، وأشرت بيدي إلى يده، فقال: لا، لو كان هكذا لكان مخلوقا.

Translation:

From Abdullah ibn Qays, I heard Abul Hasan ar-Ridha reciting (the verse) “Nay, both His hands are spread out” (al-Maida 64). I said to him: “He had hands line these?” and pointed by my hands to his. He said: “No, if they would be like these (hands), He would be (considered) creation”.

What is important here?

Imam didn’t say, He has no hands, that is power, energy and etc. He said if Allah would have hands like ours, He would be considered creation.

Are all the Companions trustworthy?

Posted on by

By Dr. Sa`d ibn `Abdullah Al Humayyid:

Question:

How to answer those who say: How could you say that all the Companions are trustworthy and accept all their narrations despite the fact that they commit grievous and minor sins which is something threatens their integrity. The proper thing is not to call them upright or trustworthy until their integrity is confirmed and those whom seem to be corrupt, their integrity shall be questioned?

•   •   •   •   •

Answer:

Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah. Now coming to the point: Continue reading →

The ruling on insulting the Companions of the Prophet (peace be upon him)

Posted on by

By Dr. Sa`d ibn `Abdullah Al Humayyid:

Praise be to Allah and peace be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family, his Companions, and those who followed them.

The issue of insulting the Companions (may Allah be pleased with them) is one of the issues that need lengthy explanation because the one who insults them may do so because of a worldly rivalry between them, and that is obvious in their lifetime. A person may insult a number of the Companions because he believes that they have apostatized or have done major sins in his view. He may also insult them because they have provided victory to this religion which he claims to be attributed to, but in fact he is not a Muslim. Continue reading →

Imam testify that Allah could be seen

Posted on by

Shia shaykh al-Barqi narrated in his “al-Mahasin” (p 60), and shaykh Azizullah al-Utardi quoted from him in “Musnad ar-Rida” (1/95):

101- عنه عن بكر بن صالح عن أبي الحسنالرضا (ع) قال من سره أن ينظر إلى الله بغير حجاب و ينظر الله إليه بغير حجاب فليتولآل محمد و ليتبرأ من عدوهم و ليأتم بإمام المؤمنين منهم فإنه إذا كان يوم القيامة نظر الله إليه بغير حجاب و نظر إلى الله بغير حجاب .

From Abul Hasan al-Rida (alaihi salam): Who wants to look at Allah without obstacle and Allah looks at him without obstacle, let him to befriend with family of Muhammad and be (far) away from their enemies, and follow Imam of believers from amongst them, (and if he would do that) in the doomsday Allah would look at him without obstacle and he would look at Allah without obstacle

mahasin 60


No to Ghadir QOM, yes to Ghadir Khumm

Posted on by

ghadirqomAn article unique in its kind. Let (first and foremost) the Ahl Al-Bayt themselves speak for themselves and see what they understood from the Ghadir incident. A call to abandon those who try to be holier than the pope, those who have started a circus-like event (including ‘Eid!) in the name of Ghadir and Ahl Al-Bait (رضوان الله علهم). A call to follow the actual understanding of the Ahl Al-Bait, of Ali Ibn Abi Talib (رضوان الله عليه) himself with regards to the sermon of the Messenger of Allah (صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم) at the pond of Ghadir, instead of those who claim to follow and love them, yet have innovated in their names, a horrendous innovation. A call to believe in the incident of Ghadir Khumm, to adopt the understanding of the Ahl Al-Bait and the Sahaba and to disbelieve in the Ghadir Qom of the Rafidah (rejectionist Shias) who have fooled millions with their emotions, tricks and deceptions.

Continue reading →

Hadith of Ghadir Khumm [A Sunni Perspective]

Posted on by
Introduction

It is impossible to discuss the Hadith of Ghadir Khumm without first understanding the specific context in which the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) said what he said. This is a general rule of thumb pertaining to the Islamic canon as a whole: it is important to know the background in which a Quranic verse was revealed or a certain Hadith was said.

Continue reading →

Abdulaziz ibn Baz on marriage of person with his daughter born from adultery

Posted on by

Salam alaikum.

Shaykh Abdulaziz ibn Baz (rahimahullah) was asked about person who married to his own daughter which was born from adultery.

He said:

 هذا النكاح باطل، ما دام أنها ابنته من الزنا فالذي عليه جمهور أهل العلم، أنه نكاح باطل، لأنها خلقت من مائه فلا يجوز له نكاحها، وإن كانت غير شرعية، بنت غير شرعية ولكنها تدخل في عموم -جل وعلا-: حُرِّمَتْ عَلَيْكُمْ أُمَّهَاتُكُمْ وَبَنَاتُكُمْ[النساء: 23]، فهي بنت غير شرعية، خلقت من مائه فيكون نكاحها باطلا، ولا تنسب إليه، ولا تكون محرماً له، ولكن نكاحها باطل عند أهل العلم، لأنها خلقت من مائه غير الشرعي، فيحرم عليه نكاحها ولا تنسب إليه.

This marriage is void. Even is she is his daughter from adultery, majority of scholars upon opinion that this marriage is void. Because she was created from his water (sperm), and it is not permitted to him marry her. Even if she was not born in accordance to Shariah. She is his daughter not in accordance to Shariah, but she included in the general meaning of verse (Nisa 23) – Your mothers and daughters forbidden for you.  And she is his non shari daughter. Created from his water, and her marriage (with him) void.  She is not attributed to him (in any matter -like inheritance and etc), and she is not his mahram. BUT (ANYWAY) HER MARRIAGE IMPERMISSIBLE IN ACCORDANCE TO POSSESSORS OF KNOWLEDGE. Because she was born from his water not in accordance to the sharia. And it is not permitted for him to marry her, and to attribute her (to himself).

http://www.binbaz.org.sa/mat/12294

Softness regarding weak chains in Targheeb wat Tarheeb

Posted on by

Hafidh al-Iraqi said in “Sharhul alfiyatul hadeeth”: As for not the fabrications, then it is permitted to show softness in the chains, and transmitting, without announcing their weakness. If that is not about al-Ahkam or Beliefs, but about Targheeb and Tarheeb in speeches, stories, merits of deeds and others like these. But if (ahadeeth) are about al-Ahkams of Sharia from halal and haram, or about beliefs, like Sifaat of Allah Taala, then it is not permitted to show softness (in accepting chains of such). And from scholars which seen that it is permitted to show softness (regarding weak chains of ahadeth in Targheeb and Tarheeb and etc), and show proofs for that from Imams: Abdurrahman ibn Mahdi, Ahmad ibn Hanbal, Abdullah ibn Mubarak and others. (Quoted from Ajwibatul Fadeela of imam Lucknawi p 39-40)