Category Archives: Various fatwas of shia scholars

Sistani strikes again

Posted on by

Salam alaikum,

Just in brief some religious ruling from shia beloved scholar.

Let us first start with marriage with breast feeding babies. This was already confirmed by Khomayni before.

At his official site, Sistani said:

2501. If a man contracts Nikah with a suckling girl, and the wife of that man suckles her, then it is considered that the wife becomes the mother-in-law of her husband, and therefore, becomes haraam for him. Although this consideration is not free from Ishkal, yet precaution should not be ignored.

2502. If a person wants that his sister-in-law (his brother’s wife) may become his Mahram, he may contract a temporary Nikah with a suckling girl, for example, for two days, and during those two days, the wife of his brother may suckle that girl as mentioned in rule no. 2483. By so doing, she will become his mother-in-law, and thus be Mahram. But if the woman suckles the girl from his brother’s milk, it is a matter of Ishkal.

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2356/

And some coins of Sistanis brilliant fiqhi ideas to add.

Breast feeding of child by DEAD WOMAN!

2483. The following are the eight conditions under which suckling child becomes the cause of being Mahram.
That the child sucks the milk of a woman who is alive. It is of no consequence if milk is drawn from the breast of a woman who is dead. That the milk of the woman should not be the product of fornication or adultery. Hence, if the milk for an illegitimate child is breastfed to another child, the latter will not become Mahram of anyone. That the child sucks milk directly from the breasts of the woman. Hence, if milk is poured into its mouth, it has no consequence. That the milk be pure and unadulterated. That the milk be of one husband only. Hence, if a breast-feeding woman is divorced and then she marries another man by whom she becomes pregnant, if the milk of the first pregnancy still continues from the breast till she gives birth to the other child, and she feeds any child eight times with the milk from her first pregnancy before giving birth, and feeds the same child seven times with the milk from the second pregnancy, after giving birth, that child will not become Mahram of anyone. That the child does not throw up the milk due to illness. If it vomits the milk, the suckling has no effect. The suckling should be of such quantity that it could be said that the bones of the child were strengthened and the flesh allowed to grow. And if that cannot be ascertained, then if a child suckles for one full day and night, or if it suckles fifteen times to its fill, as will be explained later, it will be sufficient. But if it is known that in spite of the child having suckled for one full day and night, or for fifteen times, the milk has not had any effect on the bones and the growth of flesh of the child, then one should not ignore exercising the precaution. That the child should not have completed two years of his age, and, if it is suckled after it has completed two years of its age, it does not become Mahram of anyone. In fact, if, for example, it sucks milk eight times before completing its two years, and seven times after completing its two years, it does not become Mahram of anyone. But, if milk continues from the breast for more than two years since a woman gave birth to her child, and she suckles the child continuously, that child will become Mahram of those who have been mentioned above.

http://www.sistani.org/english/book/48/2354/

Roohani: No restriction in mastering Djins and Ghosts!

Posted on by

I am speechless. 

Question:What is the command of religion on hypnotism and mastering the djinns?

Answer: There is no restriction on that.

And second take:

Question:Is mastering the ghosts improper in Islam? Why?

Answer:There is no harm in that. I have explained the reasons in detail in Feghh books.

I wonder could he play in next movie of G/B?

Dua Tawasul is NOT authentic.

Posted on by

It translates to: The authenticity of Dua Tawassul or its transmission from the Aimmah [a] is not proven to us.

Signed by Ayatollah Fadhlullah.
[so basically this famous Du’a, where shias call mention Allahs name once and then at least 12 infallibles is not authentic according to their Hadith science. Same goes for the Shirki “Nadi Ali” (the call upon Ali!) “Du’a” according to their Hadith science it is a mere fabrication. Yet poor Shias are obliged to recite them in their “Husseiniyyahs”, to get closer to Allah by mere shirki fabrications. Congratulation…]

1 faithful shia man + one prostitute = lawful shia marriage?

Posted on by

Salam alaikum.

Presenting to you several fatwas from board of ayatollat al-Hakeem.

This man said:

In the name of Allah, the most Gracious, the most merciful and Praise to Him. It is permissible to marry a prostitute temporarily but she usually does not understand this relation as a religious relation. So, you should ensure that she understands the contract as a marriage with all its responsibilities towards the husband and she should understand that the dowry is not a fee for adultery. May Allah guide you to please him.

So just picture that! Shia man have to explain to prostitute , that Islam allows him to buy her body for a sex! So, find a prostitute, but don’t forget to explain her, that paying money for sex, that is your religion!

And he said:

There is no doubt that marrying an adulteress permanently in permissible.

Fatawas from ayatollat Shahrode

Posted on by

Prepared by Tripoly sunni:

Ahlalbayt better than Quran!

In the Special Section reserved to Scholars of the Top Shia Arabic forum “YaHossein” We See a Fatwa by Ayatullah Sayyed Hussein al Shahroudi:

لعضو السائل : سلطان الواعظين
السؤال :
أيهما أعلى منزلة القرآن الكريم أم أهل البيت عليهم أفضل الصلاة وأزكى السلام؟ وشكرا

الجواب :
لا ريب أن أهل البيت عليهم السلام يضحّون بأنفسهم في سبيل القرآن الكريم، لكنّهم أفضل ان صح قياس أحدهما بالآخر، لأنهم القرآن الناطق، ولولاهم لم يخلق الله تعالى خلقاً من مخلوقات هذا العالم، والقرآن مخلوق لله تعالى لأنه كلام الله تعالى.

Questioner: Sultan al Wa’ezeen
Question: Which is greater in rank, the Holy Quran or the household(AhlulBayt) of the Prophet PBUH? thanks.

Answer: No Doubt AhlulBayt sacrifice themselves for the sake of the Quran, but if we could do qiyas then they Would Be Better as they are a “Speaking Quran” and if it weren’t for them Allah wouldn’t create any creature of this world, and the Quran as we know is a creature of Allah as it is the speech of Allah.

————————————————————-

Questions in the grave!

العضو السائل : عاشق الحسين
السؤال :
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
بداية نرحب بسماحة آية الله السيد حسين الشاهرودي ، وجزاكم الله خيرا لما تبذلون من جهد للإجابة على أسئلتنا.
وثانيا نشكر إدارة الموقع الكريمة والمشرفين الكرام على هذه الإستضافة.
وثالثا سؤالي عن منكر ونكير وأسئلة القبر والأئمة عليهم السلام فقد وجه لي هذا السؤال
س : من المعروف انه عندما يتوفى الإنسان، وينزل إلى القبر، يأتي منكر ونكير ويسأل الإنسان الأسئلة المعروفة (من ربك؟ وما دينك؟ ومن نبيك؟ و…….) والتي جوابها يكون شهادة أهل الإيمان (الله ربي، والإسلام ديني، ومحمد (ص) نبيي و……).
فهل عندما يتوفى الإمام المعصوم عليه السلام ، وينزل إلى قبره، يأتيه منكر ونكير ويسألانه عن هذه الشهادة؟ وان كانا يسألانه فهل يقول مثلا انه الإمام المفروض الطاعة؟
وجزاكم الله خيراً والسلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

الجواب :
الامام المعصوم عليه السلام هو امام وحجة على الملائكة أيضاً، وهو الذي يسأل الملائكة ويحتجّ عليهم، بل ملك الموت يستأذن في الدخول عليهم وقبض أرواحهم، بل ورد في حق المؤمن في بعض الحالات أنه لا يُسأَل في القبر لظهور حاله ووضوح ايمانه.
فقد ورد ان من عطس وقال بعد وضع اصبعه على انفه (الحمد لله رب العالمين، وصلى الله على محمد وآل محمد, اني آمنت بربكم فاسمعون) اذا مات وأُدخِلَ القبر وجاءه الملكان يعطس فيقول كعادته {اني آمنت بربكم فاسمعون} فيقول الملكان : لا حاجة الى السؤال من هذا الميت فانه أخبر بمعتقده.
بل يستفاد من بعض الروايات أن الأئمة عليهم السلام يأتون الى المؤمن في قبره ويلقنونه العقائد الصحيحة ويبشِّرونه بالجنة، بل انما يُسأَل الميّت في القبر ليُعرف على يعتقد بامامة الائمة الاثني عشر عليهم السلام ام لا ؟
فلا معنى لسؤال نفس الإمام عليه السلام عن ذلك.

Questioner: Ashiq al hussein.
Question: (…) It is known that when a man dies and goes into the grave the two angels Munkar wa Nakeer will come and ask him who is your Lord? What is your religion? Who is your prophet? ……… And the answer of the people of belief is (Allah is my lord, Islam is my religion, Muhammad PBUH is my Nabi………)
So when the infallible Imam dies PBUH and goes to his grave will Munkar wa Nakeer come and ask him about the Shahadah? and will he reply by for example I am the Imam who must be obeyed?

Answer: The infallible IMAM PBUH is an Imam and Hujjah on the angels as well, and he will be the one to ask the Angels and use hujjah on them, in fact the angel of death will take their permission before he extracts their souls, It was even mentioned regarding the believers in some cases will not even be questioned in the grave because of his clear Iman and apparent faith.
It was mentioned that he who sneezes and then says after he places his finger on his nose (Al Hamdu Lillah rab al Alameen, Sala Allahu ala Muhammad wa Alu muhammad, I have believed in your Lord so hear me) So when he dies and enters the grave and sneezes and he says as usual (I have believed in your lord so hear me) Then the two angels say: No need to question this dead for he has confessed his beliefs.
We even benefit from some of the narrations that the Imams PBUT come to the believer in his grave and teach him the proper aqeedah and give him glad tidings of heaven, in fact the dead are questioned in order to verify if they believe the twelve Imams or not, so there is no reason to question the imam himself about it.

These guys left no door of Ghulu which they didn’t open, astaghfirullah the Imams are Gods literally.

——————————————

Accusations of Aisha.

العضو السائل : حسن الروح
السؤال :
ما حكم الزواج من ناصبيه؟؟؟
وكيف النبي محمد يتزوج من ناصبية والتي هي عائشه؟؟؟
وكيف الإمام الحسن المجتبى يتزوج من ناصبية والتي هي جعيدة بنت الأشعث ؟؟؟
الجواب :
ج1. باطل
ج2. أولاً : الأحكام كانت تدريجية، ولعل كفر الناصبي ونجاسته وبطلان الزواج منه كان من الأحكام المتأخرة التي أُمر النبي (ص) بتبليغها في آخر عمره بل مما فوض النبي (ص) تبليغها الى الأئمة عليهم السلام
ثانياً : عائشة وان كانت مبغضة للإمام علي عليه السلام ولأهل البيت عليهم السلام إلا أنها لم تكن تظهر العداء والبغض على عهد النبي (ص)، والناصبي انما هو من يظهر العداء لأهل البيت عليهم السلام، فيحكم بكفره بعد اظهار البغض بالسبّ والتبرّي ونحو ذلك، وقد كان الزواج مبنياً على ظاهر الحال، فكل من تشهد الشهادتين جاز النكاح معه وإن كان يبطن الكفر، ويكون منافقاً.
ج3. أولاً : يمكن انها كانت موالية حينما تزوجها الإمام الحسن عليه السلام ثم بعد ذلك خُدعت واقدمت على قتل الامام الحسن عليه السلام طمعاً في الدنيا لا لأجل العداء والبغض .
ثانياً : على فرض كونها مبغضة ومعادية للإمام من أول الأمر لم تكن تظهر العداء والبغض لتكون محكومة بحكم الناصبي، وقد تزوجها الامام عليه السلام لمصالح اجتماعية او سياسية على اساس ظاهر حالها وهو الاسلام وان كانت منافقة.

Questioner: Hassan alRooh.

Question:
1- What is the ruling on marrying a nasibi woman???
2- How can the Prophet PBUH marry a nasibi woman who is Aisha???
3- How is it that Imam al Hassan al mujtaba would marry a nasibi woman who is Ju’aidah bint al Asha’ath???

Answer:

1- Batil (broken not accepted).
2- Firstly, The rulings descended gradually, and probably the kufr of the nasibi and his najasah(impurity) and the annulment of his marriage are probably some of the rulings which were revealed at the end of his life PBUH and it could be that he even entrusted the Imams PBUT to spread it and make tableegh about it.
Secondly, Even if Aisha is a hater of imam Ali PBUH and his ahlulbayt PBUT she never revealed her hatred during the life of the prophet PBUH and as we know the Nasibi is one who shows his hatred to ahlulbayt, that marriage was built upon what was apparent from her condition and back then anyone who took Shahadah was permissible for marriage.
3-Firstly, it could be that she was Muwaliyah(Loyal to ahlulbayt) when Imam al Hassan PBUH married her, and then she was tricked and tried to kill him PBUH because of her greed and love of this life and not because of her hatred for him. Secondly, let us say for the sake of argument that she was a hater and enemy of the imam, it could be that she never showed this so we can’t say she’s nasibi and the imam married her for social benefits or political benefits and only for what appeared of her and that is Islam even if she was a hypocrite.

Anal pregnancies and precautionary measures to avoid mixing of lineage

Posted on by

Prepared by brother Umar ibn al-Khatab, edited by us:

Possibilities of rawafid getting born from rear and precautionary measures to avoid mixing of lineage.

Wisdom behind Iddah in IslamQuestion: Why should a woman observe iddah after divorce?

Answer: Making sure that she is not pregnant, so that there would be no confusion on who the father of the child is in case she were to remarry and get pregnant right away.

So according to Islam the wisdom behind observing iddah period is to avoid mixing of lineage. Moreover a normal women only gets pregnant when she has intercourse in her vagina…but do shia women only get pregnant when they have intercourse in vagina? Well we already learned that some specially chosen women get pregnant in their thighs when giving birth to Imams. So is there a third way to pregnancy with this cult? To find the answer lets go and ask promiscuous ayatullats.

Rafidi ayatullats are very well aware of the fact, they as a cult, are the filthiest creatures. Infact they consider themselves as Allah’s filthies creation ever to walk on earth, and thus said in possibility of rawafid been born from rear of a women and for this reason took all necessary precautionary measures to avoid, not the pregnancy, but avoid mixing of lineage…i.e. bloody ties of anus!We have here ayatullat Rohani and Sistani issuing fatwah to make sure a rafidi woman observes iddah period after she is sodomized.


Fatwah of Rohani

-1-

السؤال: انا متزوج متعة باكر و تم الدخول دبرا برضاها و الان تقدم لها لشاب للزواج الدائم؛ هل للدخول في الدبر عدة؟
و كم مدة العدة لها؟

الجواب: باسمه جلت اسمائه
نعم للدخول فی الدبر عدة و هی خمسة و اربعون یوما- ان کانت الزوجة فی سن من تحیض و لا تحیض- و ان کانت تحیض فالعدة حیضتان کاملتان

Question: I am married in mutah to a virgin and entered in her anus with her consent, and now a man proposed her for normal marriage; Is entering in anus has iddah?
Answer: In his name
Yes entrance in anus has iddah and it is 45 days if the wife was in the age when women menstruate but does not menstruate – but if she menstruates then her iddah is two complete menstruations.
-2-

السؤال: عند وطأ الزوجة المتمتع بها دبراً، هل تجب عليها العدة؟ و هل فتوى أم
احتياطاً؟
الجواب: باسمه جلت اسمائه
وطأ الزوجة المتمتع بها دبرا يوجب العدة فتوي لااحتياطا

Question: If when one has sex with muta’h wife in her anus, does it become obligatory on her to observe iddah? Is this a fatwah or precautionary measure?
Answer: In his name
Having sex with mut’ah wife in her anus, iddah becomes obligatory. It is fatwah and not precautionary measure.
Fatwah of Sistani

-1-
Source:  Official site

السؤال 5: فتاة بكر دخل عليها زوجها من الدبر وتطلقت منه هل لها عدة؟ وهل يجوز لها تزويج نفسها بالعقد المنقطع
دون إذن الولي؟
الجواب: تجب العدة , ويجوزلها ان تزوج نفسها دائما اومنقطعا بدون اذن الولي .

Question 5:
A young virgin woman whose husband entered her in her anus and then he divorced her, so is there iddah for her? And can she marry herself with temporary contract (mut’ah marriage) without the permission of her guardian?Fatwah:
Iddah becomes obligatory, and it is permissible for her to marry herself permanently or temporarily without the permission of her guardian.

-2-
Source:  Official site

السؤال: هل یجوز الزواج المتعة من فتاة مطلقة بدون أن أدخل بها؟ علما بأنها ما تزال بكر؟

الجواب: إذا لم یدخل بها زوجها حتّی من الدّبر فلابد من استئذان الأب بالعقد علیها ان لم تكن مستقلة في شؤون حیاتها بل حتى لو كانت مستقلة ـ علی الأحوط ـ.

Question 72:
Is it permissible to have mut’ah (pleasure) marriage with a young divorced woman without having sexual intercourse? Knowing that she is still a virgin?
Fatwah
If her husband did not have intercourse with her, even in her anus, then it is must to take permission from her father incase she is not independent in her affairs, even if she was independent – based on precaution -.
-3-

257 السؤال:
هل ادخال الرجل في دبر المتمتع بها يعد مما يتحقق به الدخول ، ويترتب عليه آثار عنوان المدخول بها ؟.. وهل ثمة فرق بين العقدين الدائم والمنقطع في ذلك ؟

 

الفتوى:
يترتب عليه آثار الدخول ، ولا فرق بين الدائم والمنقطع

Question 257:
If a man inserts (his p****) in the anus of the one used for mut’ah (pleasure) counted as intercourse, and is this categorized under the title of a woman who had intercourse?.. And is there any difference between the two contracts, permanent and temporary regarding this?
Fatwah:
It is categorized under the one who had intercourse, and there is no difference between permanent and temporary.
-4-

258 السؤال:
لو أتى الرجل المتمتع بها في دبرها ، ثم وهبها المدة وهي في العادة .. فما هو مبدأ حساب العدة ؟.. وهل الحيضة التي تكون فيها داخلة في حساب العدة ؟.. وهل من فرق بين كون الهبة قد وقعت أول العادة أو وسطها أو آخرها ؟ وحيث تورطت المرأة صاحبة المسألة في زواج متسرع من رجل آخر كان لا بد من البت في الأمر سريعاً ؟
الفتوى:
لا تحسب تلك الحيضة من العدة ، بل عليها إتمام حيضتين ، ولا تكفي الحيضة الواحدة على الاحوط ، ولافرق بين كون الهبة أولها أو وسطها أو آخرها

Question 258:
If a man had intercourse in the anus of the one used for pleasure (mut’ah woman), then granted her interval while she was in her iddah… what is the principle of counting the iddah?.. And is the menstruation in which there was sexual intercourse counted in the iddah? ..And is there any difference if granting occurred in the initial period of iddah or in the middle or at the last? Because the woman in this issue got involved in hasty marriage with another man as there was urgency in the matter?
Fatwah:
The mentioned menstruation is not counted in the iddah, but she should complete two menstruation cycles, just one menstruation is not enough on precaution, and there is no difference if granting occurred in the initial period of iddah or in the middle or at the last.———————————————————————————————–

FINALLY

Just to shut the mouth of rawafid who might try to defend (even after seeing these clear evidence), that iddah is there even for a woman who is not entered in her front and rear.

No intercourse no iddah.

Source: Official site.

السؤال 76: كم مدة عدّة المتمتع بها اذا لن يدخل بها و كم مدة عدتها اذا دخل بها مع
اليقين بانه لم ينزل فيها و حاضت المرأة بعد الزواج و هل يصح زواجها الدائم بعد الحيض الاول من رجل آخر بعد انتهاء الزواج الموقت؟
الجواب: لاعدة مع عدم الدخول واما مع الدخول فعدة المتمتع بها حيضتان و لاتكفي الحيضة الواحدة
على الاحوط و لايصح الزواج بعد حيضة واحدة على الاحوط

Question 76:
What is the iddah period for the one who was used for mut’ah (pleasure) marriage if she was not entered upon (sexual intercourse) and what is the iddah period if she was entered upon with certainity that he did not ejaculate in her, and the woman menstruated after marriage. And is it right to have permanent marriage after the first menstruation with another man, after period of temporary marriage ends?
Fatwah:
There is no iddah in absence of intercourse and as for with intercourse, then iddah for a the one used for mut’ah (pleasure) two menstruations and just one menstruation is not enough based on precaution, also marriage is not correct after one menstruation based on precaution.


Fatawas from al-Modaressi

Posted on by

Salaam alaikum, I don’t think that there is any need to comment, just quotes.

هل تصح الصلاة مع وجود المذي في الثياب؟‏

تصح الصلاة.‏

http://www.almodarresi.com/estftaat/details.php?linkid=130

Translation:

Question:  Does pray while there is madhi on the clothes is valid?

Answer: Pray is valid.

——————————————————————————

هل يجوز ذكر الله تعالى وقراءة القران الكريم في الحمام؟
لا بأس بذكر الله و قراءة آيات من القرآن في الحمام، بل هناك أدعية مأثورة ‏يستحب قراءتها.‏

http://www.almodarresi.com/estftaat/details.php?linkid=49

Translation:

Question: Is it permitted to mention Allah Taala, and read Quran al-Kareem in tolilet?

Answer: There is no problem in mentioning Allah and reading verses from Quran in the tolilet, and there are even some recommended prayers for there.

Fatwa on infant from al-Khomayni

Posted on by

Salam alaikum, leader of Iranian revolution in his book “Tahrir al-wasela” said:

It is impermissible to have intercourse with ones wife before she reaches 9 years, without matter is that permanent or temporary marriage, and as for as all other enjoyments like touching with sexual desire, hugging and placing your private part in-between her thighs, then there is nothing wrong with that, even if it is done with an infant.

Professional rafidi prostitutes

Posted on by

Prepared by brother Umar bin Khattab

Source:
شبكة السراج في الطريق إلى الله

164 السؤال:
يوجد في مناطق تكون الحالة الاقتصادية فيها سيئة ، والنساء في هذه المناطق يتمتعن من أجل كسب المال فقط لا من أجل الشهوة .. فهل يجوز التمتع بهن ؟
الفتوى:
يجوز

Translation:
Question 164:
There are places were the financial status of society is bad, and women in these places practice mut’ah for sake of money and not for lust..so is it allowed to have mut’ah with them?
Fatwah:
Its permissible.

Screen shot:

——————————————————————————————————————–

Source: شبكة السراج في الطريق إلى الله

201 السؤال:
هل يجوز أن تمتعهن المرأة ، أو الفتاة زواج المتعة كمهنة ضمن الضوابط الشرعية تعيش وتتكسب من خلالها ؟
الفتوى:
يجوز

Translation:
Question 201:
Is it permissible for a woman or girl to enjoy mut’ah as profession under sharia regulations, live and earn through it?
Fatwah:
Its permissible.

Screen shot:

——————————————————————————————————————-

Source: شبكة السراج في الطريق إلى الله

185 السؤال:
هل يستوجب زواج المتعة عقدا على الورق ؟.. وهل يستوجب شهودا ؟
الفتوى:
لا يحتاج

Translation:
Question 185:
It is obligatory to write mut’ah marriage contract on piece of paper?…and is it obligatory to have witnesses?
Fatwah:
Its not required.

Screen shot:

Scandalous fatwa from al-Khoei

Posted on by

http://arabic.al-khoei.org/falea.htm

السؤال: هل يجوز لمس العورة من وراء الثياب من الرجل لعورة رجل آخر ، ومن المرأة لعورة أخرى ، لمجرد اللعب والمزاح ، مع فرض عدم إثارة الشهوة ؟
الفتوى: لا يحرم في الفرض ، والله العالم.

Question 784: Can a Man touch the private parts of another man from behind the clothes and a woman touch those of another woman, jokingly and just for fun under the condition that it does not arouse Lust?
Answer: It’s not Haram if it does not (arouse Lust).
Source: Sirat al najah fi Ajwibat al istifta’at Part 3.