“One cannot be a Sunni unless hating Ali …” – Blatant lie attributed to Imam Ahmad!

By Ebn Hussein | Gift2Shias

Many Sunnis who are ignorant of Shiism and its vile and hateful nature are often completely perplexed when they hear the first time how many Shiites (more so before the age of social media and Internet) actually believe that Sunnis hate or dislike Ali/Ahlul Bayt, or at least Sunni scholars. This is an ancient lied with which every single (religious) Shiite is brainwashed with from young age by their clergy in order to keep them away from Muslims/Sunnis and from the true, balanced and middle path, the path of the victorious sect, the Ahlus-Sunnah wa al-Jama’ah, the lover of the Ahlul Bayt and Sahabah.

Continue reading

How the Nasibi anus made the infallible merciful

anusssThe Rafidah believe that `Ali b. Abi Talib had a weakness, what was that weakness? The mighty Anus of an alleged Nasibi (enemy of Ahl al-Bayt). Why would people who have turned our master `Ali (رضی الله عنه) into a demi-god would believe in such thing and degrade him like that? Well, it’s simply due to their fanatism and hatred for the Sahabah which most of the time makes them insulting and degrading the Ahl al-Bayt, albeit without realising it. Let me explain it to you further:

Continue reading

Shiite Mahdi will be killed by a bearded lady called Saeedah



العديد من المؤمنين يتساءلون عن الطريقة التي سيموت بها الإمام المهدي ، وإذا كان (عليه السلام) سيستشهد فهذا يعني أنّ الغاية من كلّ مسيرة الأئمّة (عليهم السلام)ومن غَيبة الإمام الطويلة ـ وهي تحقيق الكمال للبشريّة وتوجّههم للدين ـ لن تتحقّق ، فما هو قولكم في ذلك؟

الجواب :باسمه جلت اسمائهنقلَ صاحب كتاب إلزام الناصب: أنّه إذا تمّت السبعون سنة، أتى الحجّةَ الموت، فتقتله امرأة من بني تميم اسمها سعيدة، ولها لحية كلحية الرجال، بجاون صخر من فوق سطح، وهو متجاوز في الطريق. وفوزه بالشهادة لا يتنافى مع بلوغ البشريّة قمّة الكمال، فإنّ الكمال للمجموع، وليس لكلِّ فرد فرد.


Continue reading

Ponder over the pond of Ghadir

26631803The Messenger of Allah (صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم) performed his last Hajj pilgrimage with around 100.000 Sahaba. As we all should know by now, the Rafidah made a huge deal about his sermon at the pond (Khom) of Ghadir. They have blown it out of proportion, including innovating an ‘Eid (Ghadir!) to Islam, claiming that it is the best ‘Eid (‘Eidullah Al-Akbar!) in the sight of Allah (of course the day of the so called announcement of Ali’s Wilayah/divine-leadership is their greatest day, not the announcement of the Prophethood of the Messenger of Allah!). The true meaning of the Ghadir Hadith according to the Ahl Al-Bait themselves has been covered in our previous article and leaves no room for doubt for the unbiased researcher that the Ahl Al-Bait themselves where not upon the creed and understanding of their so called ‘Shias’ (followers/partisans).

Continue reading

The Rafidi heresies sourrounding Laylat Al-Qadr – Hideous as usual

You have probably seen it, especially in this age of social networks. The thing the Rafidah do in Ramadhan. Yes, it’s about the hideous and (obviously) heretical looking practice of the so called ‘true followers of the Sunnah, the followers of the Ahl Al-Bayt” etc. on the (awaited) night of Laylat Al-Qadr when they put the Qur’an on their heads (instead of reciting them, they recite Shirki Du’as), similar to to donkeys and the Yahood:


The Sabaite Rafidah have taken this practice from the Jews. What you see above is a Jew and the thing on his head is actually (parts) of the Torah! That thing is called “tefillin” (mentioned in the Torah as “totafos”, and often seen in English translations as “frontlets”). They contain parchments with verses from the Torah. During the weekday morning service, one of the boxes (the “Hand t’filluh”) is placed upon the
left arm so that it rests against the heart, and the suspended leather strap is wound around the left hand, and around the middle finger of
that hand. The other box (the “Head t’filluh”) is placed upon the head, above the forehead, so as to rest upon the cerebrum.

And this is how this Dhalaalah, this Bid’ah, this heresy and misguidance looks in (Rafidi) action:


This innovation compared to their other innovations is in fact of the softer kind, for Rafidis have been fooled to such an extent (by the Rafidi clergy) that they are willingly practice clear-cut Jewish practices, practices such as writing letters to their saints:

Continue reading

Third testimony of the Shia Athaan is an accursed Bid’ah according to classical Shia scholars

The following article has been published by Nader Zaveri (Shiite who opposes some Shia heresies and innovations). We repost it here  with no alterations and editions whatsoever. After having read the article below you’ll probably be very shocked and angry at those heretic ‘Ayatollahs’ who are hiding the truth from their gullible followers i.e. the bitter truth that the third testimony in the Athaan is an accursed Bid’ah no matter if you believe it is not ‘part of the Athaan’ as some apologetic Shias say. But don’t expect much from these heretics for they(Shia scholars who just care about innovating more and more) have brought their OWN Bid’ah to a next level by having added a fourth and fifth etc. testimony to the Athaan, see HERE>>>).

Continue reading

May Allah curse the Shias for adding ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ to the Athaan

Here the hideous Bid’ah of the hideous Rafidah (that some of the classical Rafidah even rejected, read HERE>>>),


and here Saying: ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ is WAJIB in the Athaan!!!

As you can see the likes of Yasser Al-Habib have even included FATIMAH AND ABA AL-FADHL (half-brother of Al-Hussein) to the Adhan. And if anyone’s going to complain and looking for a excuse by saying that the Al-Habib dude is some sort of extremist, then know that ALL their scholars are extremists by definition, merely for adding ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ to the Adhan, there are a scholars amongst them, other than Yasser Al-Habib who also not just add Ali but also FATIMAH and ALL the 12 Imams into the Adhan:

Ayatullah Modarresi’s hukm says regarding the inclusion of Fatimah (!!!) in the third testimony of Adhan & Iqaamah

هل يجوز في الأذان قول “أشهد أنّ علياً أمير المؤمنين والصديقة الطاهرة ‏فاطمة الزهراء وأبنائهما المعصومين أولياء الله”؟

لا بأس بذلك بقصد الرجاء.‏


Q: Is it permissible to say in the Adhan: ‘I bear witness that Ali is the chief of the believers and that the truthful and pure Fatimah Az-Zahra’ and their infallible sons are the Awliya (close friends) of Allah?’

A: There is nothing wrong with it, with the intention of Rajaa’ (doing something with the hope of the acceptance or pleasure of Allah)

[Link to original]


fatima in the adhan

Not good enough? What about a major Marja’ like Sistani:



Is it permissible to add the name of our mistress Fatimah Al-Zahra’ (SWA) into the THREE testimonies of the Adhan (making it FOUR) and Iqamah (like: I bear witness that Ali, Fatimah and her infallible sons are the proofs of Allah).

Answer/Fatwa by Ayatullah Al-‘Udhma Sayyid Ali Al-Hussayni Al-Sistani:

It is permissible to add the phrase into the Adhan and Iqamah!

Now check what Al-Sadooq (Ibn Babawayh Al-Qummi), one of the biggest classical Shia scholars said about those who ‘merely’ included Ali into the Adhan:

Book: Man Laa YaHduruh Al-Faqeeh, vol. 1, pg. 290 – 291

Author: In Babawayh al-Qummi (‘Al-Sadooq’)


هَذَا هُوَ الْأَذَانُ الصَّحِيحُ لَا يُزَادُ فِيهِ وَ لَا يُنْقَصُ مِنْهُ وَ الْمُفَوِّضَةُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ قَدْ وَضَعُوا أَخْبَاراً وَ زَادُوا فِي الْأَذَانِ مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ فِي بَعْضِ رِوَايَاتِهِمْ بَعْدَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَوَى بَدَلَ ذَلِكَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ لَا شَكَّ فِي أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ وَ أَنَّهُ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً وَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً وَ آلَهُ صَلَوَاتُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِمْ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ وَ لَكِنْ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ فِي أَصْلِ الْأَذَانِ وَ إِنَّمَا ذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِيُعْرَفَ بِهَذِهِ الزِّيَادَةِ الْمُتَّهَمُونَ بِالتَّفْوِيضِ الْمُدَلِّسُونَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ فِي جُمْلَتِنَا
‘This is the authentic (Sahih) Adhan, nothing is to be added or subtracted from it. The Mufawwidah’s (form of Ghulat/extremists), may Allah curse them, have fabricated traditions and have added to the Adhan مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ (Muhammad and the family of Muhammad are the best of mankind) twice. In some of their traditions, after saying أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah) (they add) أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that ‘Ali is the Wali of Allah) twice. Among them there are others who narrate this أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ (I bear witness that ‘Ali is the commander of the faithfull) twice. There is no doubt that ‘Ali is the Wali of Allah and that he is the true commander of the faithful and that Muhammad and his family, peace be upon them, are the best of creatures. However, that is not [part] of the original Adhan. I have mentioned this so that those who have been accused of concocting tafwid and have insulated themselves in our ranks should be known.

COMMENT: After all those centuries of lying the Rafidah are still not ashamed to throw around with terms like BID’AH! I mean, what the heck? They are DROWN into Bid’ah how can they even use the word Bid’ah? They should avoid it just as they’ve nearly avoided the term TAWHID and SUNNAH (hence you see everything aroung them is Ail/Wilayah/Ali/Wilayah/Hussein/Mahdi/Fatimah/Wilayah/Wilayah etc.). They accuse the Sahabah of Bid’ah (like Omar adding to the Fajr Adhan, which is nothing but a LIE: REFUTATION 1>>>and 2>>>), yet they have not a SINGLE Sahih narration where the Prophet صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم ordered or agreed with their Bid’ah of “Aliyun Waliullah” in the Adhan. They (like Yasser Al-Habib above) even added the name FATIMAH (RA) into the Adhan!


This sect is constantly changing, at first they never said it, then there appeared some Ghulat as Sadooq says who started saying it and he accused them of being cursed heretics, a couple of years later the practice becomes wide spread among them so their scholars start allowing it, a couple of years later many opinions arise all of them claiming that it is “Mustahabb” or recommended to say it during Adhan, and finally in  our days we’re starting to see new opinions saying that this is WAJIB and that Fatimah should be included etc…. And the journey of the deviants continue. In fact this Bid’ah (just like the black and white turban clergy caste system amongt the Shias) is an Safavid innovation. The modern Rafidah scholars aren’t the first major scholars to allow it, before them Al-Majlisi the first and al-Majlisi the second (ie. Mohammad Taqi AlMajlisi and Mohammad Baqir Majlisi ) allowed it, when it was basically becoming the ‘norm’ under the Safavids. So it was the palace scholar of the Safavids, the heretic Al-Majlisi (who introduced so many Majoosi elements into the already full of superstition and heresies rotten Shia sect) who  backed up his father and said that doing this 3rd testimony in the Adhan / Iqaamah is a great act. The Shias who in their propaganda always claim that the Sunni schools are actually results of the Umayyad dynasties have actually introduced a heretical innovation into the Adhan that was started by the blood thirsty Safavids with the HELP of Shia scholars! It was Shah Isma`il, leader of Safawid dynasty who said to first add the 3rd testimony in Adhaan. And as stated before, the first major scholar to add it was al-Majlisi I (Muhammad Taqi al-Majlisi) in his RawDah al-Muttaqeen, vol. 2, pg. 245-246 also in his Persian commentary of Man Laa Yahduruh al-Faqeeh called Lawaam` Saahibaqaraani, vol. 3, pg. 565-567. According to his statements in these books, the wilayah in the Adhaan was already prominent (because of Shah Isma`il’s decree). al-Majlisi’s I teacher stopped reciting the 3rd testimony in adhan, because of that he was being accused of being Sunni, so al-Majlisi I convinced him to do so. Then, his son al-Majlisi II (Muhammad Baaqir al-Majlisi) followed his dad’s footsteps and tried to provide “proofs” for it in his magnum opus called Bihaar al-Anwaar.

The first one to say it is mustahab was al-Majlisi II, in his Bihaar al-Anwaar, vol. 81, pg. 111:

و أقول لا يبعد كون الشهادة بالولاية من الأجزاء المستحبة للأذان لشهادة الشيخ و العلامة و الشهيد و غيرهم
And I say: ‘it is not improbable that the shahaadah of wilaayah is from the mustahab parts of the adhaan based off the testimony of al-Shaykh (al-Toosi), al-`Allaamah (al-Hilli), al-Shaheed (al-Thaani), and others’

But in fact there are 0 (zero) SaHeeH hadeeth from Shee’ah books that says that it is permissible to add the 3rd testimony in Adhaan or Iqaamah. Or ANY hadeeth that says that it is mustahab (recommended), or anything that says “do it with the intention of it NOT being part of the adhaan/iqaamah”. None. Zero. Nada.


Related posts from Gift2Shias:

Did Omar altered the Athaan? (“Prayer is better than sleep”)

Hayyaa ‘alaa Khayr Al-‘Amal – An abondened Sunnah, removed by Omar?

‘Praying is better than sleep’ (al-salaatu khayrun min al-nawm) – SAHIH narrations in Sunni books

Prophet (saws) didn’t recognize Angel

Narrated by as-Saduq in Maanil Akhbar (p 104):



Musa ibn Jafar  (a.s.) said, ‘Once when the Messenger of Allah was sitting an angel who had twenty four faces came to him. The Messenger of Allah said to him, “My friend Jibril, I had not seen you in this form before.” The angel said, ” Iam not Jibril, (I am Mahmud). Allah, the Most Majestic, the Most gracious, has sent me to join in marriage the light with the light.” He then asked, “Who with who?” The angel said, “Fatima and Ali (a.s.).” The Imam (a.s.) said, “When the angel turned back on his shoulder it said, “Muhammad the Messenger of Allah, and Ali (a.s.) the executor of his will.” The Messenger of Allah asked, “Since when this has been written on your shoulder?” The angel replied, “It was there twenty two thousand year before Allah created Adam.”

We all know that shias believe that neither prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) nor Imams could err.

Majlisi in Rawda said hadith is strong (5/349), and also said strong as saheeh (8/187).

Did Omar (at least) threatened Fatimah? Disputed Sunni narration analysed


Alhamdulillah, we have got a number of articles in regards to the refutation of the sick belief of the Rafidha named “the broken rib” i.e. their accusation that the Sahaba, particularly Abu Bakr, Omar, Abu Ubaydah Ibn Al-Jarrah etc. burned down the house of Fatimah, slapped her, broke her ribs, caused her miscarriage (killed her unborn son)  and other fabricated stories straight from Bollywood, pardon Rafidhiwood:

Wave of lies. Narrations on broken rib analysed.

Here another analysis

That article is absolutely unique for the English speaking audiance and a must-read, for it refutes every possible Shubha (doubt) and narration that the Rafidha quote from our books to prove “the broken rib” fairy-tale. In fact. In fact, we have already responded even to the narration they bring up in our analyses today, the difference is that this narration  might be considered Sahih (the only Sahih narration in regards to that incident!) so we decided that it is worth to dedicated this narration a detailed analyses, and trust us the result will be the absolute termination of Rafidhism, they will wish to never have brought up this narration in the first place. Alhamdulillah previous articles on the web in Arabic, then the translations into English have forced even Shia scholars (and some laymen) to reconsider their approach, they know that in this age it is not that easy to fool every Muslim layman i.e. the days where a Rafidhi could just throw a bunch of ultra-weak and fabricated Tarikh book narrations (“Sunni sources”) in the face of a Sunni layman are over.

Continue reading

Kulayni, Saduq and Tusi near the grave of al-Hussein (ra)

At one night I saw that three had gathered near the grave of our master al-Hussein (ra),
So I decided to go to them and ask them what the purpose of their gathering was..

The first one said:
Thiqat al-Islam abu Ja`far Muhammad bin Ya`qoub bin Ishaq al-Kulayni al-Razi, writer of al-Kafi. Continue reading