Tampering book of Abdullah Shubbar “Aslu Asliyah”

as-Salam Alaikum.

1_zpsb5277250 2_zps07b9dd6f3_zps6094a402

These are basically 3 pages (including the cover) of shia book Aslu Asliyah. It was written by famous zindiq Abdullah Shubbar.

On the second page you can see the heading that says: Chapter of obligation to act upon what is present in our hands from Quran (ilal akhir)

On the bottom of the third scan (p 132 from the book), in the footnote you can see comment from editor (I do assume) that said:
كان قبل هذا الباب باب يناسبه، ارتأى كثير من الأفاضل حذفه لكونه محركا لبعض المشاعر
“Before this chapter WAS another one connected to this (by meaning), a lot of distinguished (shias) were upon the view that it should be removed, because (this chapter) was some kind of ignition for some feelings”.

So let me know present for respected members the scan copies of manuscript, where this chapter remained.


As you can see it is chapter:
باب وقوع التغيير والتحريف والنقصان في القرآن
Chapter of the occurrence of the change and distortion and decreases in the Qur’an

And underlined you can see Shubbar quoting book of Kulayni sound shia hadith about 17000 verses in the Quran
So this is a chapter that can “ignite some feelings”. For example feeling of hate from Muslims.

Wa Allahu Alam.
Source: http://alsrdaab.com/vb/showthread.php?t=63493

Tahrir at-Tawusi – corrupted and changed version


There is a famous shia narrator Hisham ibn al-Hakam, and he was known mujasima (anthropomorphist). This fact well accepted by Islamic scholars, and at the same time it was several times testified by shias themselves.  Continue reading

Ibn Tawus al-Hilli and his alleged shaykh

Not sure that there is a need in the introduction of ibn Tawus al-Hilli.

Just a quote from his book “Muhaj ad-Duat” (p 137, load here)


He said:

و من ذلك دعاء لمولانا أمير المؤمنين علي ع المعروف بدعاء اليماني
أخبرنا أبو عبد الله الحسين بن إبراهيم بن علي القمي المعروف بابن الخياط
And from this Dua to Mawlana commander of Faithful Ali (a), known as dua al-Yamane.
NARRATED TO US Abu Abdullah al-Husayn ibn Ibrahim ibn Ali al-Qummi, known as ibn al-Khayat…

Mushkilah: Abul Qasim ibn Tawus was born in 589 h.

Ibn al-Khayat was from shaykhs of Abu Jafar at-Toose.

At-Toose died in 460 h.

Opinions? How to explain such gap between people who suppose to met? Because ibn Tawus clearly used term “and narrated to US”. That term suppose that they have to met each other.

May be they met when ibn Tawus was sleeping?  I remember that sh. Mufid once debated with Umar :RA Anho: in his dream. )

Majlisi and his career as an editor


I came across to beautiful hadith from Imam Jafar as-Sadiq (rahimahullah), which said:

Majlisi Tahrif

أوصيكم بأصحاب نبيكم لا تسبوهم، الذين لم يحدثوا بعده حدثاً، ولم يئووا محدثاً؛ فإن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم أوصى بهم الخير

I advise to you regarding the Companions  of your prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam), don’t abuse them, who did not bring any innovation in the deen and never supported any innovator and the Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam) ordered to behave well towards them.

Source: Biharul Anwar (22/305-306)

It is easy to change the meaning of this hadith in shia way, that Imam advised not to abuse those companions which didn’t bring any innovation. And we all know that shias use to accuse companions not simple in innovations but also in the disbelief.

BUT! If you would check the footnote from shia editor, you would see interesting information  which force me to belief that Majlisi, or any other shia scholar work hard on edition of this hadith.

Footnote says:

 في المصدر: لا تسبوهم وهم الذين.

In the (original) source written: Don’t abuse them, and they didn’t 

Let me put this part into the context:

 Original source:

don’t abuse them, and they did not bring any innovation in the deen and never supported any innovator

Majlisi’s version:

don’t abuse them, which did not bring any innovation in the deen and never supported any innovator

Ayatollah Tabatabai’s Tafseer of [5:3]


One of the brothers wanted me to read TabaTabae’s Tafseer of verse [5:3] famous as “The verse of completion of religion”, and al-TabaTabaei was basically saying that this was revealed about the Imamah, and that this is the last order in Ghadeer Khum and that Allah completed the religion and completed his favor on us by revealing Imamah.
He also said that this can’t be about Hajj or anything else, it has to be about something BIG and NEW and that when this verse descended on that day the Kouffar lost hope as the verse says as they thought that after the Prophet (SAWS) dies there will be no Imams or successors to carry his message. Continue reading

Abbas Qummi changed report from Khisal

First I’d like to present report which was originally narrated by ibn Babaweyh in “Khisal” (report 219):

  الخصال : ابن المتوكل ، عن السعد آبادي ، عن البرقي عن محمد بن زياد الأزدي قال : سمعت مالك بن أنس فقيه المدينة يقول : كنت أدخل إلى الصادق جعفر بن محمد فيقدم لي مخدة ، ويعرف لي قدرا ويقول : يا مالك إني أحبك ، فكنت أسر بذلك وأحمد الله عليه ، قال : وكان رجلا لا يخلو من إحدى ثلاث خصال : إما صائما ، وإما قائما ، وإما ذاكرا ، وكان من عظماء العباد ، وأكابر الزهاد الذين يخشون الله عز وجل ، وكان كثير الحديث ، طيب المجالسة ، كثير الفوائد ، فإذا قال : قال رسول الله اخضر مرة ، واصفر أخرى حتى ينكره من كان يعرفه ، ولقد حججت معه سنة فلما استوت به راحلته عند الاحرام ، كان كلما هم بالتلبية انقطع الصوت في حلقه ، وكاد أن يخر من راحلته فقلت : قل يا ابن رسول الله ، ولابد لك من أن تقول ، فقال : يا ابن أبي عامر كيف أجسر أن أقول : لبيك اللهم لبيك ، وأخشى أن يقول عز وجل لي : لا لبيك ولا سعديك

Muhammad ibn Musa ibn al-Mutevakil – may God be pleased with him – narrated that Ali ibn al-Hussein al-Sa’ed Abady quoted on the authority of Ahmad ibn Muhammad ibn Khalid, on the authority of his father, on the authority of Abu Ahmad Muhammad ibn Zyad al-Azodi that he had heard the jurisprudent in Medina Malik ibn Anas say, “I went to see Ja’far ibn Muhammad as-Sadiq (alaihi salam) often. He (alaihi salam) put down a cushion for me to rest on and respected me and said, ‘O Malik! I love you.’ I became happy that he (alaihi salam) was so kind to me and praised God so much that he (alaihi salam) was always either fasting, praying or busy mentioning God. He was one of the greatest worshippers and one of the greatest abstainers who feared the Honorable the Exalted God. Ja’far (alaihi salam) knew a lot of traditions. He (alaihi salam) was very pleasant. A lot of people attended his meetings and benefitted a lot from his presence. Whenever he (alaihi salam) mentioned the name of God’s Prophet (sallalahu alaihi wa ala alihi wa sallam), he (alaihi salam) turned so blue or yellow that even those who knew him could not recognize him. Once I attended the Hajj pilgrimage along with him (alaihi salam). He (alaihi salam) was riding on a camel and while trying to say ‘Labayk. Allahuma Labayk’  he could not utter it and dismounted. Then I said, ‘O (grand)son of God’s Prophet! Do you have to say it?’ Then the Imam (alaihi salam) said, “O Ibn Abi Amer! I am afraid of saying ‘Labayk. Allahuma Labayk’  since I fear that the Honorable the Exalted God might respond in the negative and say ‘La Labayk and la Sa’edayk!.’

Just look how Imam Jafar as-Sadiq says to Imam Malik ibn Anas that he loves him.

Other priest of rafidah, shaykh Abbas al-Qummi in “al-Anwarul Bahiya” p 157 quoted this report in this way: Continue reading

Bahrani on commentary from Saduq

Yusuf al-Bahrani in Hadaiq an-Nadera said about shia shaykh Saduq:

While he was discussing report he said:

والظاهر أن هذا التفسير من كلام الصدوق ، الذي يدخله غالبا في الأخبار


And apparently this commentary from the words of Saduq, WHICH HE OFTEN INSERTS IN THE REPORTS.

Saduq was one of the main figures in shia religion, and he is one of their greatest hadith scholars. So as you see Yusuf Bahrani testifies that this great shia muhadith OFTEN inserted in the reports his own comments.

Originally posted: http://www.dd-sunnah.net/forum/showthread.php?t=147327

Alteration of Biharul Anwar

This is just  Q/A from official site of Yasir al-Habib (laeen):


Dear Shaikh Yasir Al-Habeeb,
as-salamu alaikum,

What is your opinion in regards to “Bihar Al-Anwar” that has been edited in Iran in 99 volumes, three volumes were REMOVED. What did they remove? Any certain topics? Why did the removal take place?
Thank you very much.


In the name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
Allah praises are due to Allah, The Lord of The Worlds, and may the peace and the blessings be upon our master Muhammad and his pure and good progeny and may the curse of Allah be upon all of their enemies.

as-salamu alaikum wa rahmatulllahi wa barakatuhu.

The Shaikh said that the removal is against the Shar’iah and etiquettes, and what has been removed is volume 29, 30 and 31 from the encyclopedia, it included the sections and Ahadith of the infallible Ahl Al-Bayt peace be upon them, that dealed with slander against Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Aisha, Hafsah and the leaders of the Hypocrites, the criminals [Sahabah] may the curses of Allah ta’aala be upon them.

The reason for the removal is to satisfy the Nasibis [haters of Ahl Al-Bayt] and the opponents of us on the account of burying the heritage of the family of Muhammad peace be upon them. This is a big crime among the many crimes of this unjust regime that rules Iran, may Allah hasten its removal.

Office of Shaikh Yasir Al-Habib in London, 11th of Dhu Al-Qa’dah, 1430.

Alteration of supplication of Kumail

It is famous shia supplication, and we took translation from known shia site, duas.org.

You can see them wrote:

And by Thy own self that shall endure forever after all things have vanished

But in Arabic text, it is written:

And by Your Face that shall endure forever after all things have vanished

They have changed word (face) to (Thy own self)

You can see them wrote:

And by the light of Thy countenance which illuminates everything

But more clear and correct translation from Arabic would be:

And by the light of Your Face which illuminates everything

Just because rafidah don’t accept such attribute of Allah like Face, then decided to alternate text of dua, and changed words of supplication in one place, and used not so clear meaning in other one.

Saduq, Mufid, Bada and more

Praise to Allah, in our previous posts we show sufficient proofs that shaykh of shias as-Saduq was known for changing traditions, tampering texts, and omitting parts of it (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) .

And here another proof that he was not reliable.

In his book “Man la yahduruhul faqih”, second volume, chapter on visitation of two Imams: Abul Hasan Ali ibn Muhammad and Abul Hasan Muhammad ibn Ali, he said: Continue reading