Who are the Rafidah?

abbaskhoei

In The Name Of Allah

All Praise Is Due To Allah (Subhanahu Wa’ Ta’alaa), Inshallah Let us look at the beginnings of this Deviated sect which arose in the early generations.

The word Raafidah means “rejectors”, the Rawaafidh have obtained their name by their rejection of Zayd ibn ‘Alee ibn al-Hussayn ibn Alee ibn Abee Taalib , the great grandson of ‘Alee Bin Abee Taalib (Radiyallahu Anhu).

Imaam adh-Dhahabee said in his Siyaar A’laam an-Nubalaa (5/390):

Continue reading

Hafidh Beyhaki on 6 months issue

Bismillah.

Salam alaikum.

Imam Beyhaki said in Itiqad wal Hadiy ila sabili Rashad (p 494):

The thing that was narrated regarding Ali didn’t pledge allegiance to Abu Bakr 6 months, is not from words of Aisha. That is words of az-Zuhri, which some narrators inserted to hadith of Fatima from Aisha (may Allah be pleased with them). Muamar ibn Rashid memorized it, and narrated it in clear form, and he marked words of az-Zuhri separate from hadith itself.

Scan page: Continue reading

Qur’an has a Shia chain of transmission?

Posted by  on Dec 4th, 2013

The Imami Shia of our time use many deceptive strategies in order to defend their beliefs, from these strategies is to accuse their opponents of defects that they themselves have. This tactic serves no purpose other than wasting time, it is an easy quick escape for them. Continue reading

al-Shareef al-Radi & his brother al-Shareef al-Murtada.

Unfortunately the later you go, the more fabricators this sect produces.

al-Dhahabi says about al-Murtada in al-Meezan:

الشريف المرتضى المتكلم الرافضى المعتزلي، صاحب التصانيف

[al-Shareef al-Murtada, the out-spoken, Rafidhi, Mu`tazili, author of many works.]

Then he says that he had such a high station in the government that they appointed him as the head of Niqaabatal-Ashraaf. Continue reading

Ponder over the pond of Ghadir

26631803The Messenger of Allah (صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم) performed his last Hajj pilgrimage with around 100.000 Sahaba. As we all should know by now, the Rafidah made a huge deal about his sermon at the pond (Khom) of Ghadir. They have blown it out of proportion, including innovating an ‘Eid (Ghadir!) to Islam, claiming that it is the best ‘Eid (‘Eidullah Al-Akbar!) in the sight of Allah (of course the day of the so called announcement of Ali’s Wilayah/divine-leadership is their greatest day, not the announcement of the Prophethood of the Messenger of Allah!). The true meaning of the Ghadir Hadith according to the Ahl Al-Bait themselves has been covered in our previous article and leaves no room for doubt for the unbiased researcher that the Ahl Al-Bait themselves where not upon the creed and understanding of their so called ‘Shias’ (followers/partisans).

Continue reading

Stance of Ahlesunnah on Yazeed ibn Muawiyah

Shaykh Allaha Muqbil ibn Hadi al-Wadi said:

مختلفٌ فيه بين أهل السنة ، فمنهم من يراه كافراً ، ومنهم من يراه فاسقاً ، والذي رجحه الحافظ الذهبي – ولعله الصواب إن شاء الله – أنه يعتبر فاسقاً ، وأمره إلى الله .

Ahlesunnah differed in regards to him. And from them who called him Kaafir, and from them who called him Faasiq. And hafidh adh-Dhahabi preferred opinion – which is more correct, inshAllah – that he was Faasiq. And his ruling upon Allah.

Sourcehttp://www.muqbel.net/fatwa.php?fatwa_id=501

Scholars of Ahlul-Sunnah from Ahlul-Bayt (Part 1)

“Mukhtaṣar A`lām al-Ḥanafiyyah min Ahl-ul-Bayt”

Scholars of Ahlul-Sunnah from Ahlul-Bayt (Part 1)
In this thread In-shā’-Allāh, I shall post my translation and abridgment of the book “A`lām al-Ḥanafiyyah min Ahl-ul-Bayt” by Muḥammad Wā’il al-Ḥanbalī.

Objective of the book:

This book is a research done in some books of history and biographies in which the author gathers the names of all famous and iconic men who have two things in common:

1- They belong to the Ḥanafī Madhab.
2- They are from the progeny of Ahl-ul-Bayt.

What the original Arabic book contains that my summary does not contain: Continue reading

The grave of ‘Ali

taken from:

Hereafter mention is made of the discovery of the grave of Sayyiduna ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib radiyallahu ‘anhu at Najaf 150 years after his death. Shirazi explains the initial secrecy surrounding the location of the graves in light of fear that the Umayyads would desecrate the grave. However, what he doesnot explain is why the location of the grave was revealed by Imam Musa al-Kazim to the Khalifah Harun ar-Rashid when the Abbasids, according to the Shi‘ah, were no less cruel to the ‘Alawis than were the Umayyads.

Hasan al-Amin writes in his Shorter Shi’ite Encyclopaedia: “Then came Abbasid rule. They were more severe upon the Alawides in their persecution and cruelty as well as upon the Shi’ites as compared to the Omayyides. Their rule was more troublesome and bitter for them, as a poet has said: ‘By God, the Omayyids did not do one-tenth in their case, as Banu Abbas did.’ Amir Abul Faras al-Hamadani says: ‘Banu Harab (Omayyids) did not succeed in these crimes even though though they intended to, as compared to your success.’ (p. 36)”

Continue reading