Category Archives: – Abu Bakr & Omar (الشيخين)

Imam Al-Baqir: The Rafidah are ignorant of the Sunnah!:

Posted on by

حَدَّثَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْفَضْلِ، بِمِصْرَ قَالَ: نَا إِبْرَاهِيمُ بْنُ شَرِيكٍ، قَالَ: نَا عُقْبَةُ بْنُ مُكْرَمٍ، قَالَ: نَا يُونُسُ بْنُ بُكَيْرٍ , عَنْ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ إِسْحَاقَ , عَنْ أَبِي جَعْفَرٍ مُحَمَّدِ بْنِ عَلِيٍّ قَالَ: مَنْ لَمْ يَعْرِفْ فَضْلَ أَبِي بَكْرٍ وَعُمَرَ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُمَا فَقَدْ جَهِلَ السُّنَّةَ

فضائل الصحابة للدارقطني

[…] Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. ‘Ali (Al-Baqir) said: “Who does not know the virtues of Abu Bakr and ‘Omar, may Allah be pleased with him, is ignorant of the Sunnah.” [Fada’il Al-Sahabah by Al-Daraqutni, also in the Musnad, Fada’il Al-Sahabah by Imam Ahmad]

Detailed article about Imam Al-Baqir>>>

Tabarsi on companions of Ali (r.a)

Posted on by

Bismillah.

Salam alaikum. Once we already posted information where shia scholar Shareef al-Murtada stated that majority of Ali’s followers befriended Abu bakr and Umar (may Allah be pleased with all of them) and accepted their Imamate.

Now I’d like to show you another quote from other known shia scholar at-Tabarsi.

In his book “Khatimatul Mustadrak” (5/18) he said:

Khatimatul Mustadrak

ومن هنا يعلم: ان الذين قتلوا مع امير المؤمنين (عليه السلام) في الحروب الثلاثة كانوا شهداء وفيهم كثير ممن كانوا يتولونهما

Translation:

“and from this it is known: that those who fought along with commander of faithful (alaihi salam) in 3 battles (Jamal;Nahravan; Siffin) and became a martyrs, and between them were a lot of (people) who befriended them”.

And in the footnote written:

أي ممن كانوا يتولون الخلفيتن: الاول، والثاني

Translation:

Mean those who befriended two caliphs: First and Second.

 

 

 

Khomeini too says Prophets do NOT leave inheritance … [FADAK]

Posted on by

Unfortunately Shias (including their scholars) are often so blinded in their hatred towards the Sahaba that they forget their own books and verdicts. Take for instance Abu Bakr dispute with Fatimah (رضوان الله عليهما) in regards to the former Jewish land of Fadak. They do not just accuse Abu Bakr of denying Fatimah’s so called right (let’s say based on a hadith he misunderstood or something), rather they claim that he bluntly fabricated a narration. This is pure Shia bias and shows how deep their grudge is for this great man. You will often hear Shias saying:

I believe that she got angry because Abu Bakr usurped her right and concocted a hadith about the Prophets not leaving inheritance …

Now here is the bloody truth:

Continue reading →

5/10/2013, Shias of Baghdad curse the Sahaba in a Sunni district

Posted on by

MawkebAlbara2ahUPDATED (NEW PICTURES) 12/10/2013

The Shias cursing the companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him), his wives and companions … in the past a so called ‘evil acccusation’ by the ‘evil Wahhabis’ (as Shia apologetics tried to waterdown the disgusting reality of their cult), today, a well known fact (we have reported how they celebrate the death of the Sahaba in their temples, in the UK, Canada and Iraq). The last jahil Sunni on earth shouldn’t be excused anymore if he even doubts in the kufr of these Mushriks and enemies of Islam and the hatred they carry for Islam and its people, the Ahl Al-Sunnah. Now recently a few days ago, a group of Shias of Baghdad lead by Thaer Al-Darraji (a foul mouthed Rafidi who posts filth on youtube, and who got exposed of being a homosexual when brothers hacked his computer which was full of gay porn!) walked through the Al-A3dhamiyyah district of Baghdad (a traditionally Sunni district, named after Imam Al-A3dham i.e. Abu Hanifa. Al-A3dhamiyyah is were Imam Abu Hanifa رضي الله عنه is buried!) and cursed Omar Ibn Al-Khattab رضي الله عنه and Aisha the Mother of the Believers رضي الله عنها by calling the the cursed ones and sluts/sodomites etc (the UK/Fulmer based Shiite hate preacher ‘Sheikh Yasser Al-Habib’ has openly stated his support for this secterian extremism).

Continue reading →

‘Praying is better than sleep’ (al-salaatu khayrun min al-nawm) – in Shia books

Posted on by

Here are some narrations from Shia books, that would be authenticated according to the standards of most Shia scholars, nevertheless be assured that the Rafidah will reject them. It’s stil a good blow to them (also check the links on the bottom of the post).

Continue reading →

Hayyaa ‘alaa Khayr Al-‘Amal – An abondened Sunnah, removed by Omar?

Posted on by

That’s what the Shia claim, the very Shia who included accursed and hideous innovations into their Adhan (see HERE>>>), these Rafidah have the audacity to accuse the Ahl Al-Sunnah of Bid’ah! The people who are drown in Bid’ah and heresies dare to use to word Bid’ah! What an oxymoron indeed. They argue that it was (as their usual claim) Omar Al-Farooq (رضي الله عنه) who removed it from the Adhan because ‘he disliked it’. They also sometimes argue based on a few narrations from some of the Salaf who used to say the phrase (‘Hayya ‘alaa khayr ..’) in the Adhan. So what’s the truth? Did Omar removed it? Did anyone removed it? Are the deeds of the Salaf (if we asume that some really used to say that phrase), even from the Sahaba evidence enough (if in contradiction to what the Prophet صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم taught)?! Let’s find that out, Insha’Allah.

The Rafidah say:

Continue reading →

Third testimony of the Shia Athaan is an accursed Bid’ah according to classical Shia scholars

Posted on by

The following article has been published by Nader Zaveri (Shiite who opposes some Shia heresies and innovations). We repost it here  with no alterations and editions whatsoever. After having read the article below you’ll probably be very shocked and angry at those heretic ‘Ayatollahs’ who are hiding the truth from their gullible followers i.e. the bitter truth that the third testimony in the Athaan is an accursed Bid’ah no matter if you believe it is not ‘part of the Athaan’ as some apologetic Shias say. But don’t expect much from these heretics for they(Shia scholars who just care about innovating more and more) have brought their OWN Bid’ah to a next level by having added a fourth and fifth etc. testimony to the Athaan, see HERE>>>).

Continue reading →

Was Omar a hypocrite despite Hudhayfah’s testimony? عمر في الجنة

Posted on by

The brothers at TwelverShia.net have already done a wonderful job in refuting a NUMBER of deceitful (and always unnecessarily lengthy) articles of the Rafidi blog RTS (RevisitingtheSalaf). One of the latest refutations was in regards of one of the cheapest Rafidi ‘arguments’ (also used by the likes of Yasser Al-Khabeeth etc.) namely:

Response to: Assassination Attempt On The Prophet (saw)

Now pretty much everything has been answered there. Our aim in this article is to shed some more light on a particular accusation of that Rafidi blog against (as usual) Omar bin Al-Khattab (may Allah be pleased with him) and indirectly against Othman Ibn Affan. They cite a narraton from Hudhayfah Ibn Al-Yaman (may Allah be pleased with him) concerning Al-Farooq Omar. Let us first introduce you to the great Sahabi Hudhayfah Ibn Al-Yaman:

Continue reading →

Lineage Of Omar bin Al-Khattab (May Allah Be Pleased With Him)

Posted on by

عمممرررThe Rafidha Shia propagandist are the most biased people towards Omar Ibn Al-Khattab, so there is no wonder that they use anything, literally anything against Al-Faruq, including attacking his lineage (a trait of Jahiliyyah, attacking ones lineage …). Here the answer to their cheap and filthy lie they eagerly recycle (copy from other websites). They took this lie from the masters of lies, the Mullah Pasha, the palace scholar of the Safavids, the polytheist heretic and Khatim Al-Muhadditheen (!) of the Rafidha, the Majoosi (SEE HERE), Mullah Baqir Al-Majlisi:
Look very carefully at the sanad and see the lie of Al-Majlissi

وجدت في كتاب عقد الدرر لبعض الأصحاب بإسناده عن علي بن إبراهيم عن أبيه عن الحسن بن محبوب عن ابن الزيات عن الصادق
انه قال : كانت صهاك جاريه لعبد المطلب وكانت ذات عجز وكانت ترعى الإبل وكانت حبشيه وكانت تميل إلى النكاح فنظر إليها نفيل جد عمر فهواها وعشقها في مرعى الإبل فوقع عليها فحملت منه بالخطاب فلما أدرك البلوغ نظر إلى أمه صهاك فأعجبه عجزها فوثب عليها فحملت منه بحنتمه فلما ولدتها خافت من أهلها فجعلتها في صوف وألقتها بين اشحام مكة فوجدها هشام بن المغيره بن الوليد فحملها إلى منزله ورباها وسماها بالحنتمه و كانت شيمة العرب انه من ربى يتيما يتخذه ولدا فلما بلغت حنتمه نظر إليها الخطاب فمال إليها وخطبها من هشام فتزوجها فأولد منها عمر فكان الخطاب أباه وجده وخاله وكانت حنتمه أمه وأخته وعمته , وينسب إلى الصادق ( ع ) في هذا المعنى
من جده خاله ووالده وأمه أخته وعمته اجدر أن يبغض الولي وان ينكر يوم الغدير بيعته

Continue reading →

Want to follow Ali (عليه السلام)? Follow his final verdict and send salam on Omar (صلوات الله عليه)

Posted on by

259894_10151148859173651_875475863_nYes,  a good number of rock-solid Sahih narrations (whom Rafidah in their picking and chosing game will never mention) state so. So next time a Rafidi shows you such and such Hadith (like the Hadith in Bukhari where Omar says Ali called him a liar etc.) that says Ali had an argument with Omar, or Ali called Omar this or that etc. then you know how to respond:

The Sahaba (Ahl Al-Bayt included) were human beings and human beings have arguments, heck, the Qur’an says that TWO BELIEVING groups can be involved in a war and fight with one another, this is because NONE of them (neither the Ahl Al-Bayt nor the Sahaba) were ‘infallibles’, they were not Prophets to be infallible in any shape or form, hence they committed sins, but their good deeds were by far greater than their sins, hence Allah had forgiven them and promised them Jannah, hence Ali Ibn Abi Talib forgave his brothers and had (ultimately) nothing but good to say about his brothers the Sahaba, especially the likes of Omar Ibn Al-Khattab.

Everyone by now knows that the religion of hatred and cursing (Shiasm) tries its UTMOST to potray the Sahaba and Ahl Al-Bayt as die-hard enemies. They try to use every narration to

Continue reading →

Did Omar (at least) threatened Fatimah? Disputed Sunni narration analysed

Posted on by

imagesBY EBN HUSSEIN

Alhamdulillah, we have got a number of articles in regards to the refutation of the sick belief of the Rafidha named “the broken rib” i.e. their accusation that the Sahaba, particularly Abu Bakr, Omar, Abu Ubaydah Ibn Al-Jarrah etc. burned down the house of Fatimah, slapped her, broke her ribs, caused her miscarriage (killed her unborn son)  and other fabricated stories straight from Bollywood, pardon Rafidhiwood:

Wave of lies. Narrations on broken rib analysed.

Here another analysis

That article is absolutely unique for the English speaking audiance and a must-read, for it refutes every possible Shubha (doubt) and narration that the Rafidha quote from our books to prove “the broken rib” fairy-tale. In fact. In fact, we have already responded even to the narration they bring up in our analyses today, the difference is that this narration  might be considered Sahih (the only Sahih narration in regards to that incident!) so we decided that it is worth to dedicated this narration a detailed analyses, and trust us the result will be the absolute termination of Rafidhism, they will wish to never have brought up this narration in the first place. Alhamdulillah previous articles on the web in Arabic, then the translations into English have forced even Shia scholars (and some laymen) to reconsider their approach, they know that in this age it is not that easy to fool every Muslim layman i.e. the days where a Rafidhi could just throw a bunch of ultra-weak and fabricated Tarikh book narrations (“Sunni sources”) in the face of a Sunni layman are over.

Continue reading →

The Shi’ah claim that the Sahaabah did not attend the funeral

Posted on by

Question:

Asslam o alaikum..
Shia claims that Hazrat Abu Baker, Hazrat Umar and Hazrat Usman were not present at time of Janaza e Rasool. Is it true? If no! Then plz provide some authentic proves about Janaza e Rasool..
Jazak Allah…

Answer:

Bismillah,

wa Alaikum Salam.

Answered by Islamqa:

http://islamqa.info/en/ref/116375

Ali and Tarawih

Posted on by

Imam AbdulHay al-Lucknawi in his “Tuhfatul ahyar” (p 105) :

It was narrated from Ali that he said: May Allah enlighten the grave of Umar, like he enlighten upon us our mosques.  And from Abdurrahman as-Sulami that Ali called for reciters in the Ramadan, and ordered to two men to pray with people 20 rakahs. And Ali prayed with them Witr. And from Arfajah: Ali ordered people to stand (in the prayers) in Ramadan, and he set Imam for men and Imam for women. And Arfajah said: I was leading women, this was narrated by Beyhaki in his Sunnan.