Bismillah.

Al-Haydari quotes the narration from Al-Bukhari and Muslim that says that A’isha didn’t want to name Ali:

Here mentioned hadith from Bukhari:

حدثنا أبو اليمان قال أخبرنا شعيب عن الزهري قال أخبرني عبيد الله بن عبد الله بن عتبة أن عائشة قالت لما ثقل النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم واشتد به وجعه استأذن أزواجه في أن يمرض في بيتي فأذن له فخرج النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم بين رجلين تخط رجلاه في الأرض بين عباس ورجل آخر قال عبيد الله فأخبرت عبد الله بن عباس فقال أتدري من الرجل الآخر قلت لا قال هو علي بن أبي طالب رضي الله عنه

Rough translation: “When the Prophet (pbuh) became heavy and his pain increase, he asked his wives so that he could be treated in my house. So the Prophet (pbuh) came out between two men, with his feet brushing against the floor. One was Al-Abbas, and the other was another man.” Ubaidullah (the narrator) said: I told Abdullah bin Abbas, and he asked me, “Do you know the other man?” I said, “No.” He said, “It is Ali bin Abi Talib (raa).” Continue reading →

Here you can see Kamal saying that everything what was narrated in two saheehs, that’s authentic, and it’s possible to rely upon it and base religion upon it.  Then he mentioned that Muawiyah was mentioned in saheeh, and he also said that all other ahadeth which condemns Muawiyah, Banu Umeyah are not accepted (by sunnis) because they are not in sahehayn.

And he said literally:

كل هذا لو جاء لا ينفع باعتبار أنه لم يرد في الصحيحين وكل ما لم يرد في الصحيحين لا يمكن الاحتجاج به

All these if would be mentioned, that doesn’t work (for sunnis) as it wasn’t mentioned in sahihayn, and everything what wasn’t mentioned in sahihayn, it’s not possible to rely upon it.

 

We have two possible explanation for words of Haydari.

1) He mean that it’s not possible to debate with sunnis, or to use against us, sources other than sahihayn.

But this kind of explanation doesn’t work. Because we saw this Kamal using many book other than sahihayn, in his attacks upon sunnah.

2) He mean that we – ahlesunnah- doesn’t accept any sources except  two saheehs, because we rely only on two books.

And this is what he mean, and no doubt this is blatant lie. No one from scholars of Islam ever said that it’s not possible to rely upon any other books than saheeh of Bukhari and saheeh of Muslim.

Here we can see this liar saying: THEY (AHLESUNNAH) CAME AND SAID: IF NARRATOR LOVES ALI HE IS INNOVATOR

I don’t think that we should even bother ourselves in explanation that this shameless liar lied upon us. Love of Ali is the sign of ahlesunnah.

Here we can see Kamal citing the book “Faradu simtain” of Juwayni, as if it a sunni book.

Here we have already explained that author of that book wasn’t sunni, but he was shii.