Ahl al-Bayt VS. the ‘Ayatullah’


Imam al-Sadiq would have made Takfir on the ‘Ayatullahs’ and the absolute majority of the Shi’ites who are indulged in such paganism in the name of Islam and the Prophet’s Household (peace be upon them):

The actual position of the Ahl al-Bayt from Shia sources whom Shias are either ignorant of or chose not to follow (due to them agreeing with the monotheistic nature of Sunnism i.e. Islam):

عن عباس بن يزيد عن ابي عبدالله عليه السلام قال: قلت له: ان هؤلاء العوام يزعمون ان الشرك اخفى من دبيب النمل في الليلة الظلماء.. فقال: لا يكون العبد مشركا حتى يصلي لغير الله أو يذبح لغير الله أو يدعو لغير الله عز وجل..»

وسائل الشيعة 341/28
وبحار الانوار 96/69
والخصال 136/1.

On the authority of Abbas Ibn Yazid [nice name for a Shia, isn’t it?], from Abi Abdillah (al-Sadiq), peace be upon him, whom I [Ibn Yazid] told: The people claim that shirk is more hidden than the creeping of an ant in the pitch-darkness of the night. He (Al-Sadiq) said: “The slave (of Allah) does not become a Mushrik until he prays to other than Allah, sacrifices for other than Allah or invokes other than Allah ‘azza wa jall”.


Wasa’el Al-Shia 341/28
Bihar Al-Anwar 96/69
Al-Khisal 136/1.

All the prohibitions are done by Imamite Shi’ites and sanctified by their Grand Ayatullahs. From praying (or invoking) the Ahl al-Bayt (under the pretext of Tawassul) to sacrificing for Imams, [Abu al-Fadhl] al- ‘Abbas etc.


Shi’ism venerates the Zoroastrian Nowrooz holiday!

1921904_499218090183958_1632911280_nNowrooz is on its way! The Pre-Islamic, Persian-Majoosi (Zoroastrian) holiday and of course anything pagan, especially pre-Islamic Persian customs do have their deep connections with the religion of the Twelver Shias. Nowrooz is the holiest day according to Zoroastrianism (Majoosism) of the year for them out of seven major holidays (the seven motif is straight from their beliefs, with Ahura Mazda co-existing with six other gods who in turn form a unity of seven, so no surprise the holiday centres now with setting out a table of seven things also called haft seen) that the `Abbasid Mutazilite (NOT Sunni nor Shia) rulers (who modelled themselves on the Persian monarchs) encouraged the celebration of and Muslims in turn adopted.

What many don’t know (even many Shias, heck even many Persian Shias) is that Nowrooz, the ancient Zoroastrian holiday is not just some traditional holiday celebrated mostly by Iranians and Kurds (and some Afghans, even among the very secular Sunni ones), no, rather it is an ESSENTIAL part of Shiism and the biggest Shia scholars who ever lived have not just sanctified it, rather they declared it as the best day ever and ascribed loads of rubbish, fabricated an disturbing narrations to the Ahl Al-Bayt who all happen (as usual) to attack the Sahaba and the Ummah and to praise pre-Islamic Persian customs!

The first people to accept the A’maal or Fazail were the representatives of Hawzah Ilmiyyah Najaf Al-Ashraf, meaning personalities like Shaykh Tusi, then Seyed Ibnay Taus and Mohaqqiq Tusi, Syed Sharif, Allama Bahauddin Amili, Allama Faiz Kashani, and from Allama Majlisi to Shaykh Abbas Qummi (author of Mafatih Al-Jinan).

all agree on this day of celebration. Seyed Mohsin Al-Amin Amili in his Miftahal Jannat, Vol 3, pg 573, depicts a hadith from

Continue reading

This is Shia cleric Hussein Al-Moayyad who left Shiism for Islam and Sunnah

Left (Shia), right (Muslim, Sunnah)

Left (Rafidi Shiite), right (Muslim, Sunnah)

Every sect and religion has their reverts and converts, so do the Rafidah. A few Christians, Hindus and other pagan Mushriks here and there (who don’t need to change alot, they travel from polytheism to polytheism) and sometimes even some ‘great’ Sunni personalities’ (i.e. in 100% of the cases either former extreme Ex-Sufis or other heretics who happen to replace Ya saint/Wali help me Ya Ali/Fatimah/Hussein/Mahdi etc. madad (help me).

Usually, the Shia they boast about how many (allegled) Sunnis convert to Shiism. Now even if that’s true  then it basically proves nothing, because the truth or falsehood are not measured by the (the number of) converts, and as a matter of fact, more Iranian Shiites turn Christian, Zoroastrian, Atheist (and even Sunni) than any other (muslim) nation in the world. Now would that make Shiism wrong by default because so many Iranian Shiites happen to convert to other religions?! Certainly not, for the truth is not measured by proving who has more or less reverts/converts (again, Shias having more reverts is an exaggeration anyway, they never mention the rise of Sunnism inside Iran, especially in Ahwaz).

Continue reading

Hajj and the day of ‘Arafa according to Islam & Rafidism [+VIDEO]

The day of ‘Arafah, a day that should be known to every single Muslim, the best day of the year in the sight of the creator of mankind, Allaah subhaanahu wa ta’aala. It is the day on which the religion was perfected (yes, on ‘Arafa and not at Ghadir Khum as the Rafidah claim) and Allaah’s Favour was completed.


The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said:

Continue reading

5/10/2013, Shias of Baghdad curse the Sahaba in a Sunni district

MawkebAlbara2ahUPDATED (NEW PICTURES) 12/10/2013

The Shias cursing the companions of the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him), his wives and companions … in the past a so called ‘evil acccusation’ by the ‘evil Wahhabis’ (as Shia apologetics tried to waterdown the disgusting reality of their cult), today, a well known fact (we have reported how they celebrate the death of the Sahaba in their temples, in the UK, Canada and Iraq). The last jahil Sunni on earth shouldn’t be excused anymore if he even doubts in the kufr of these Mushriks and enemies of Islam and the hatred they carry for Islam and its people, the Ahl Al-Sunnah. Now recently a few days ago, a group of Shias of Baghdad lead by Thaer Al-Darraji (a foul mouthed Rafidi who posts filth on youtube, and who got exposed of being a homosexual when brothers hacked his computer which was full of gay porn!) walked through the Al-A3dhamiyyah district of Baghdad (a traditionally Sunni district, named after Imam Al-A3dham i.e. Abu Hanifa. Al-A3dhamiyyah is were Imam Abu Hanifa رضي الله عنه is buried!) and cursed Omar Ibn Al-Khattab رضي الله عنه and Aisha the Mother of the Believers رضي الله عنها by calling the the cursed ones and sluts/sodomites etc (the UK/Fulmer based Shiite hate preacher ‘Sheikh Yasser Al-Habib’ has openly stated his support for this secterian extremism).

Continue reading

Shias celebrate Umm Al-Mu’mineen `Aisha’s demise in Canada

Shias in a local Husseiniyyah (innovated Rafidah place of worship, where the dead are worshipped and the living self-flagellate i.e. whip themselves ) in Ottawa the Capital of Canada celebrated the death of the Mother of the Believers `Aisha رضوان الله عليها.

Here their facebook page.

And here their ridicolous and filthy  celebration:

They chant: ‘Ayyoosheh (mocking the name of `Aisha), `Aisha is in the Hellfire …’

(Note that the normally the Shias – just as the Satanists – dress in black, except on the days when they celebrate the death anniversaries of the Sahaba and the Mothers of the Believers.)

Nawbakhtis ‘The Shia Sects’ – Proving the confusing reality of the Imamah doctrine

The period of the Rightly Guided Caliphs is often referred to as ‘The Goldren Era’ of Sunni Islam. It is remembered as a time when Muslims subdued their enemies, spread the religion and social justice across new continents and millions embraced Islam as their new way of life. Whilst we Sunni’s celebrate the successes of the Caliphate system, the memories of early Shi’i Islam is mourned by its adherents as being its darkest period marred by splits, repression of the Imaams and sectarianism. Annual bloodbath ceremonies are enacted to remember phases of early shi’a history.


The extent of shi’i infighting and confusion

Continue reading

The Rafidi heresies sourrounding Laylat Al-Qadr – Hideous as usual

You have probably seen it, especially in this age of social networks. The thing the Rafidah do in Ramadhan. Yes, it’s about the hideous and (obviously) heretical looking practice of the so called ‘true followers of the Sunnah, the followers of the Ahl Al-Bayt” etc. on the (awaited) night of Laylat Al-Qadr when they put the Qur’an on their heads (instead of reciting them, they recite Shirki Du’as), similar to to donkeys and the Yahood:


The Sabaite Rafidah have taken this practice from the Jews. What you see above is a Jew and the thing on his head is actually (parts) of the Torah! That thing is called “tefillin” (mentioned in the Torah as “totafos”, and often seen in English translations as “frontlets”). They contain parchments with verses from the Torah. During the weekday morning service, one of the boxes (the “Hand t’filluh”) is placed upon the
left arm so that it rests against the heart, and the suspended leather strap is wound around the left hand, and around the middle finger of
that hand. The other box (the “Head t’filluh”) is placed upon the head, above the forehead, so as to rest upon the cerebrum.

And this is how this Dhalaalah, this Bid’ah, this heresy and misguidance looks in (Rafidi) action:


This innovation compared to their other innovations is in fact of the softer kind, for Rafidis have been fooled to such an extent (by the Rafidi clergy) that they are willingly practice clear-cut Jewish practices, practices such as writing letters to their saints:

Continue reading

Shia Imam did not knew he had a Khariji wife

Muhammad ibn Yaqub al-Kulayni narrated:

أحمد بن محمد عن ابن فضال عن ابن بكير عن زرارة عن أبي جعفر (عليه السلام) قال: دخل رجل على علي بن الحسين (عليهما السلام) فقال: إنامرأتك الشيبانية خارجية تشتم عليا (عليه السلام) فإن سرك أن أسمعك منها ذاك أسمعتك؟ قال: نعم قال: فإذا كان غدا حين تريد أن تخرج كما كنت تخرج فعد فاكمن في جانب الدار، قال: فلما كان من الغد كمن في جانب الدار فجاء الرجل فكلمها فتبين منها ذلك فخلى سبيلها وكانت تعجبه

Rough Translation:

Ahmad bin Muhammad »» Ibn Fazzal »» Ibn Bukayr »» Zurarah »» Imam Baqir [as] said: a person came to Ali bin Hussain (Zain ul Aabideen) [as] and said: Your [as]’s wife who belongs to the Shaybani tribe is a Khariji, (she) abuses Ali [as], if you wish should I make hear from her? Imam [as] said: Yes. He said: in the morning when you [as] decide to come-out from her (house) you should hide yourself in the corner of house. He [as] said: so the next morning he [as] went hidden in the corner of house, then that man came and talked to her (Imam’s wife), so he [as] got the verification about that, so he [as] divorced her, whereas he [as] use to like her a lot.

Source: Al Kafi: vol 5 pg 351, hadith #14

Grading: Majlisi said: Mawthaq – Mirat Al Uqul, vol 20 pg 54


This riwayah shows that the ilm ghaib theory is flawed one, marrying a nasibi is not allowed in Shiism, the Imam didn’t know that he married a nasiba, someone informed him about it that O imam, you have made a person with whom marriage is impermissible according to your religion. Imam didn’t know this !

Tashayyu’ of first generation

Hafidh ad-Dhahabe said in his book “Mizanul itidal” (1/5):

“And extreme person from the sheeah in the time of the early Muslims and according to them was one who spoke ill of and reviled Uthman ibn Affan, Zubayr ibnul Awaam, Talha, Muawiyah ibn Abee Sufyan and a group who fought Alee. Whereas an extreme sheeah in our time and according to us is one who declares them disbelievers and renounces himself from Abu Bakr and also Umar. This one is misguided liar”.

Quoted from “Min aqwal al-munsefeen fi sahabe al-khaliphat Muawiya ibn Abee Sufyan” by Abdulmuhsin Abbad.

May Allah curse the Shias for adding ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ to the Athaan

Here the hideous Bid’ah of the hideous Rafidah (that some of the classical Rafidah even rejected, read HERE>>>),


and here Saying: ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ is WAJIB in the Athaan!!!

As you can see the likes of Yasser Al-Habib have even included FATIMAH AND ABA AL-FADHL (half-brother of Al-Hussein) to the Adhan. And if anyone’s going to complain and looking for a excuse by saying that the Al-Habib dude is some sort of extremist, then know that ALL their scholars are extremists by definition, merely for adding ‘Aliyun Waliyullah’ to the Adhan, there are a scholars amongst them, other than Yasser Al-Habib who also not just add Ali but also FATIMAH and ALL the 12 Imams into the Adhan:

Ayatullah Modarresi’s hukm says regarding the inclusion of Fatimah (!!!) in the third testimony of Adhan & Iqaamah

هل يجوز في الأذان قول “أشهد أنّ علياً أمير المؤمنين والصديقة الطاهرة ‏فاطمة الزهراء وأبنائهما المعصومين أولياء الله”؟

لا بأس بذلك بقصد الرجاء.‏


Q: Is it permissible to say in the Adhan: ‘I bear witness that Ali is the chief of the believers and that the truthful and pure Fatimah Az-Zahra’ and their infallible sons are the Awliya (close friends) of Allah?’

A: There is nothing wrong with it, with the intention of Rajaa’ (doing something with the hope of the acceptance or pleasure of Allah)

[Link to original]


fatima in the adhan

Not good enough? What about a major Marja’ like Sistani:



Is it permissible to add the name of our mistress Fatimah Al-Zahra’ (SWA) into the THREE testimonies of the Adhan (making it FOUR) and Iqamah (like: I bear witness that Ali, Fatimah and her infallible sons are the proofs of Allah).

Answer/Fatwa by Ayatullah Al-‘Udhma Sayyid Ali Al-Hussayni Al-Sistani:

It is permissible to add the phrase into the Adhan and Iqamah!

Now check what Al-Sadooq (Ibn Babawayh Al-Qummi), one of the biggest classical Shia scholars said about those who ‘merely’ included Ali into the Adhan:

Book: Man Laa YaHduruh Al-Faqeeh, vol. 1, pg. 290 – 291

Author: In Babawayh al-Qummi (‘Al-Sadooq’)


هَذَا هُوَ الْأَذَانُ الصَّحِيحُ لَا يُزَادُ فِيهِ وَ لَا يُنْقَصُ مِنْهُ وَ الْمُفَوِّضَةُ لَعَنَهُمُ اللَّهُ قَدْ وَضَعُوا أَخْبَاراً وَ زَادُوا فِي الْأَذَانِ مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ فِي بَعْضِ رِوَايَاتِهِمْ بَعْدَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ مِنْهُمْ مَنْ رَوَى بَدَلَ ذَلِكَ أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً مَرَّتَيْنِ وَ لَا شَكَّ فِي أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ وَ أَنَّهُ أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ حَقّاً وَ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً وَ آلَهُ صَلَوَاتُ اللَّهِ عَلَيْهِمْ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ وَ لَكِنْ لَيْسَ ذَلِكَ فِي أَصْلِ الْأَذَانِ وَ إِنَّمَا ذَكَرْتُ ذَلِكَ لِيُعْرَفَ بِهَذِهِ الزِّيَادَةِ الْمُتَّهَمُونَ بِالتَّفْوِيضِ الْمُدَلِّسُونَ أَنْفُسَهُمْ فِي جُمْلَتِنَا
‘This is the authentic (Sahih) Adhan, nothing is to be added or subtracted from it. The Mufawwidah’s (form of Ghulat/extremists), may Allah curse them, have fabricated traditions and have added to the Adhan مُحَمَّدٌ وَ آلُ مُحَمَّدٍ خَيْرُ الْبَرِيَّةِ (Muhammad and the family of Muhammad are the best of mankind) twice. In some of their traditions, after saying أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ مُحَمَّداً رَسُولُ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that Muhammad is the Prophet of Allah) (they add) أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً وَلِيُّ اللَّهِ (I bear witness that ‘Ali is the Wali of Allah) twice. Among them there are others who narrate this أَشْهَدُ أَنَّ عَلِيّاً أَمِيرُ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ (I bear witness that ‘Ali is the commander of the faithfull) twice. There is no doubt that ‘Ali is the Wali of Allah and that he is the true commander of the faithful and that Muhammad and his family, peace be upon them, are the best of creatures. However, that is not [part] of the original Adhan. I have mentioned this so that those who have been accused of concocting tafwid and have insulated themselves in our ranks should be known.

COMMENT: After all those centuries of lying the Rafidah are still not ashamed to throw around with terms like BID’AH! I mean, what the heck? They are DROWN into Bid’ah how can they even use the word Bid’ah? They should avoid it just as they’ve nearly avoided the term TAWHID and SUNNAH (hence you see everything aroung them is Ail/Wilayah/Ali/Wilayah/Hussein/Mahdi/Fatimah/Wilayah/Wilayah etc.). They accuse the Sahabah of Bid’ah (like Omar adding to the Fajr Adhan, which is nothing but a LIE: REFUTATION 1>>>and 2>>>), yet they have not a SINGLE Sahih narration where the Prophet صل الله عليه و على آله و سلم ordered or agreed with their Bid’ah of “Aliyun Waliullah” in the Adhan. They (like Yasser Al-Habib above) even added the name FATIMAH (RA) into the Adhan!


This sect is constantly changing, at first they never said it, then there appeared some Ghulat as Sadooq says who started saying it and he accused them of being cursed heretics, a couple of years later the practice becomes wide spread among them so their scholars start allowing it, a couple of years later many opinions arise all of them claiming that it is “Mustahabb” or recommended to say it during Adhan, and finally in  our days we’re starting to see new opinions saying that this is WAJIB and that Fatimah should be included etc…. And the journey of the deviants continue. In fact this Bid’ah (just like the black and white turban clergy caste system amongt the Shias) is an Safavid innovation. The modern Rafidah scholars aren’t the first major scholars to allow it, before them Al-Majlisi the first and al-Majlisi the second (ie. Mohammad Taqi AlMajlisi and Mohammad Baqir Majlisi ) allowed it, when it was basically becoming the ‘norm’ under the Safavids. So it was the palace scholar of the Safavids, the heretic Al-Majlisi (who introduced so many Majoosi elements into the already full of superstition and heresies rotten Shia sect) who  backed up his father and said that doing this 3rd testimony in the Adhan / Iqaamah is a great act. The Shias who in their propaganda always claim that the Sunni schools are actually results of the Umayyad dynasties have actually introduced a heretical innovation into the Adhan that was started by the blood thirsty Safavids with the HELP of Shia scholars! It was Shah Isma`il, leader of Safawid dynasty who said to first add the 3rd testimony in Adhaan. And as stated before, the first major scholar to add it was al-Majlisi I (Muhammad Taqi al-Majlisi) in his RawDah al-Muttaqeen, vol. 2, pg. 245-246 also in his Persian commentary of Man Laa Yahduruh al-Faqeeh called Lawaam` Saahibaqaraani, vol. 3, pg. 565-567. According to his statements in these books, the wilayah in the Adhaan was already prominent (because of Shah Isma`il’s decree). al-Majlisi’s I teacher stopped reciting the 3rd testimony in adhan, because of that he was being accused of being Sunni, so al-Majlisi I convinced him to do so. Then, his son al-Majlisi II (Muhammad Baaqir al-Majlisi) followed his dad’s footsteps and tried to provide “proofs” for it in his magnum opus called Bihaar al-Anwaar.

The first one to say it is mustahab was al-Majlisi II, in his Bihaar al-Anwaar, vol. 81, pg. 111:

و أقول لا يبعد كون الشهادة بالولاية من الأجزاء المستحبة للأذان لشهادة الشيخ و العلامة و الشهيد و غيرهم
And I say: ‘it is not improbable that the shahaadah of wilaayah is from the mustahab parts of the adhaan based off the testimony of al-Shaykh (al-Toosi), al-`Allaamah (al-Hilli), al-Shaheed (al-Thaani), and others’

But in fact there are 0 (zero) SaHeeH hadeeth from Shee’ah books that says that it is permissible to add the 3rd testimony in Adhaan or Iqaamah. Or ANY hadeeth that says that it is mustahab (recommended), or anything that says “do it with the intention of it NOT being part of the adhaan/iqaamah”. None. Zero. Nada.


Related posts from Gift2Shias:

Did Omar altered the Athaan? (“Prayer is better than sleep”)

Hayyaa ‘alaa Khayr Al-‘Amal – An abondened Sunnah, removed by Omar?

‘Praying is better than sleep’ (al-salaatu khayrun min al-nawm) – SAHIH narrations in Sunni books